Content Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): Teachers’ metacognitive understanding of pedagogical translanguaging

IF 4.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Hoa T.M. Nguyen , Hang T.Thu Nguyen , Lisa Gilanyi , Trang Hong Hoang , Xuesong(Andy) Gao
{"title":"Content Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): Teachers’ metacognitive understanding of pedagogical translanguaging","authors":"Hoa T.M. Nguyen ,&nbsp;Hang T.Thu Nguyen ,&nbsp;Lisa Gilanyi ,&nbsp;Trang Hong Hoang ,&nbsp;Xuesong(Andy) Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Content-Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) is gaining popularity all over the world, including Vietnam. Pedagogical translanguaging plays a critical role in promoting and sustaining multilingualism in the context of CLIL in schooling. While significant research has focused on teachers' implementation of pedagogical translanguaging, it has become equally imperative to investigate how teachers metacognitively construct translanguaging strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The primary objective of this research is to explore CLIL teachers’ metacognitive knowledge of pedagogical translanguaging in the context of Vietnam.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using case study research design, the present study draws on Flavell's (1979) conceptualization of metacognitive knowledge to reiteratively analyse interviews with 42 Vietnamese CLIL teachers and identify their understanding of pedagogical translanguaging in CLIL.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The results suggest that the participants were aware of the multilingual resources students bring to the school environment and committed to the social justice benefits but often felt guilty about overusing languages other than English in their CLIL classrooms. Furthermore, although they drew on a variety of translanguaging strategies, these were often used by some out of convenience rather than in a planned, strategic way. Finally, the study found that the teachers tended towards a deficit perspective on students, focusing more on addressing their weaknesses rather than leveraging their existing linguistic and cultural assets to benefit their learning.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These findings have significant implications for policymakers and teacher educators to develop appropriate professional development initiatives that empower CLIL teachers with adequate metacognitive understanding to effectively employ pedagogical translanguaging in CLIL contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48357,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Instruction","volume":"97 ","pages":"Article 102085"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475225000088","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Content-Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) is gaining popularity all over the world, including Vietnam. Pedagogical translanguaging plays a critical role in promoting and sustaining multilingualism in the context of CLIL in schooling. While significant research has focused on teachers' implementation of pedagogical translanguaging, it has become equally imperative to investigate how teachers metacognitively construct translanguaging strategies.

Objectives

The primary objective of this research is to explore CLIL teachers’ metacognitive knowledge of pedagogical translanguaging in the context of Vietnam.

Methods

Using case study research design, the present study draws on Flavell's (1979) conceptualization of metacognitive knowledge to reiteratively analyse interviews with 42 Vietnamese CLIL teachers and identify their understanding of pedagogical translanguaging in CLIL.

Results

The results suggest that the participants were aware of the multilingual resources students bring to the school environment and committed to the social justice benefits but often felt guilty about overusing languages other than English in their CLIL classrooms. Furthermore, although they drew on a variety of translanguaging strategies, these were often used by some out of convenience rather than in a planned, strategic way. Finally, the study found that the teachers tended towards a deficit perspective on students, focusing more on addressing their weaknesses rather than leveraging their existing linguistic and cultural assets to benefit their learning.

Conclusion

These findings have significant implications for policymakers and teacher educators to develop appropriate professional development initiatives that empower CLIL teachers with adequate metacognitive understanding to effectively employ pedagogical translanguaging in CLIL contexts.
内容语言整合学习:教师对教学翻译的元认知理解
内容-语言综合学习(CLIL)在包括越南在内的世界各地越来越受欢迎。在CLIL教学背景下,教学翻译在促进和维持多语使用方面起着至关重要的作用。在大量研究集中在教师实施教学翻译的同时,研究教师如何元认知地构建翻译策略也变得同样迫切。目的:本研究的主要目的是探讨越南语境下的CLIL教师对教学翻译的元认知知识。方法本研究采用个案研究设计,借鉴Flavell(1979)的元认知知识概念,对42名越南汉语外语教学教师的访谈进行反复分析,以确定他们对汉语外语教学中的教学翻译的理解。结果结果表明,参与者意识到学生为学校环境带来的多语言资源,并致力于社会正义的利益,但经常对在CLIL课堂上过度使用英语以外的语言感到内疚。此外,尽管他们借鉴了各种各样的译语策略,但这些策略往往是一些人出于方便而不是有计划的、战略性的方式使用的。最后,研究发现,教师倾向于从缺陷的角度看待学生,更多地关注于解决他们的弱点,而不是利用他们现有的语言和文化资产来促进他们的学习。结论这些发现对政策制定者和教师教育工作者制定适当的专业发展计划具有重要意义,这些计划可以使具有足够元认知理解的CLIL教师有效地在CLIL环境中使用教学翻译语言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: As an international, multi-disciplinary, peer-refereed journal, Learning and Instruction provides a platform for the publication of the most advanced scientific research in the areas of learning, development, instruction and teaching. The journal welcomes original empirical investigations. The papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and different methodological approaches. They may refer to any age level, from infants to adults and to a diversity of learning and instructional settings, from laboratory experiments to field studies. The major criteria in the review and the selection process concern the significance of the contribution to the area of learning and instruction, and the rigor of the study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信