Performance Validation of the IEH Laboratories Multiplex PCR Listeria Detection System for Environmental Samples in Comparison to Health Canada Reference Method (MFHPB-30) for Listeria Detection.

Eni Themeli, Tam Mai, Fereidoun Forghani, Mansour Samadpour
{"title":"Performance Validation of the IEH Laboratories Multiplex PCR Listeria Detection System for Environmental Samples in Comparison to Health Canada Reference Method (MFHPB-30) for Listeria Detection.","authors":"Eni Themeli, Tam Mai, Fereidoun Forghani, Mansour Samadpour","doi":"10.1093/jaoacint/qsaf013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laboratory detection methods are commonly tested against gold standards and corresponding reference methods to confirm their suitability and efficiency.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The IEH Listeria Test System (multiplex PCR) was tested against Health Canada's reference method (MFHPB-30) for the simultaneous detection of Listeria spp. and Listeria monocytogenes on three different surfaces: plastic (PL), sealed concrete (SC), and stainless steel (SS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The R2 medium was used for pre-enrichment of the samples at 35°C for 24 h, followed by the IEH Listeria multiplex PCR. Each individual surface coupon (PL, SC, and SS) was inoculated with either Listeria innocua, L. monocytogenes, or L. welshimeri along with two non-target microorganisms of concern and subjected to candidate (IEH Listeria multiplex PCR) and reference method (MFHPB-30) testing in an unpaired manner, including culture confirmation for the IEH method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The candidate method demonstrated 0% false negative, 0% false positive, 100% sensitivity, and 100% specificity after only 24 h enrichment followed by multiplex PCR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evaluating the differences between the candidate and reference method detection probabilities across all three surface types revealed that the candidate method was equivalent to MFHPB-30, while requiring significantly less time for detection.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>IEH Listeria system performed equivalently to the reference method, without being affected by the surface type and while decreasing the detection time to a total of less than 28 hours.</p>","PeriodicalId":94064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of AOAC International","volume":" ","pages":"422-428"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of AOAC International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoacint/qsaf013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Laboratory detection methods are commonly tested against gold standards and corresponding reference methods to confirm their suitability and efficiency.

Objective: The IEH Listeria Test System (multiplex PCR) was tested against Health Canada's reference method (MFHPB-30) for the simultaneous detection of Listeria spp. and Listeria monocytogenes on three different surfaces: plastic (PL), sealed concrete (SC), and stainless steel (SS).

Methods: The R2 medium was used for pre-enrichment of the samples at 35°C for 24 h, followed by the IEH Listeria multiplex PCR. Each individual surface coupon (PL, SC, and SS) was inoculated with either Listeria innocua, L. monocytogenes, or L. welshimeri along with two non-target microorganisms of concern and subjected to candidate (IEH Listeria multiplex PCR) and reference method (MFHPB-30) testing in an unpaired manner, including culture confirmation for the IEH method.

Results: The candidate method demonstrated 0% false negative, 0% false positive, 100% sensitivity, and 100% specificity after only 24 h enrichment followed by multiplex PCR.

Conclusions: Evaluating the differences between the candidate and reference method detection probabilities across all three surface types revealed that the candidate method was equivalent to MFHPB-30, while requiring significantly less time for detection.

Highlights: IEH Listeria system performed equivalently to the reference method, without being affected by the surface type and while decreasing the detection time to a total of less than 28 hours.

环境样品多重PCR李斯特菌检测系统与加拿大卫生部参考方法(MFHPB-30)的性能验证
背景:实验室检测方法通常根据金标准和相应的参考方法进行测试,以确认其适用性和有效性。目的:采用IEH李斯特菌检测系统(多重PCR)对加拿大卫生部参考方法(MFHPB-30)在塑料(PL)、密封混凝土(SC)和不锈钢(SS)三种不同表面同时检测李斯特菌和单核增生李斯特菌进行检测。方法:采用R2培养基,35℃预富集24h,进行IEH李斯特菌多重PCR。每个单独的表面联片(PL、SC、SS)分别接种无性李斯特菌、单核增生李斯特菌或welshimeri李斯特菌以及两种关注的非目标微生物,并以不配对的方式进行候选(IEH李斯特菌多重PCR)和参考方法(mfhbp -30)检测,包括IEH法的培养确认。结果:候选方法经24h富集后进行多重PCR检测,假阴性和假阳性分别为0%、100%、100%、100%。结论:评估候选方法与参考方法在所有三种表面类型的检测概率之间的差异表明,候选方法与MFHPB-30等效,但所需的检测时间显着减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信