Performance Validation of the IEH Laboratories Multiplex PCR Listeria Detection System for Environmental Samples in Comparison to Health Canada Reference Method (MFHPB-30) for Listeria Detection.
Eni Themeli, Tam Mai, Fereidoun Forghani, Mansour Samadpour
{"title":"Performance Validation of the IEH Laboratories Multiplex PCR Listeria Detection System for Environmental Samples in Comparison to Health Canada Reference Method (MFHPB-30) for Listeria Detection.","authors":"Eni Themeli, Tam Mai, Fereidoun Forghani, Mansour Samadpour","doi":"10.1093/jaoacint/qsaf013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laboratory detection methods are commonly tested against gold standards and corresponding reference methods to confirm their suitability and efficiency.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The IEH Listeria Test System (multiplex PCR) was tested against Health Canada's reference method (MFHPB-30) for the simultaneous detection of Listeria spp. and Listeria monocytogenes on three different surfaces: plastic (PL), sealed concrete (SC), and stainless steel (SS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The R2 medium was used for pre-enrichment of the samples at 35°C for 24 h, followed by the IEH Listeria multiplex PCR. Each individual surface coupon (PL, SC, and SS) was inoculated with either Listeria innocua, L. monocytogenes, or L. welshimeri along with two non-target microorganisms of concern and subjected to candidate (IEH Listeria multiplex PCR) and reference method (MFHPB-30) testing in an unpaired manner, including culture confirmation for the IEH method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The candidate method demonstrated 0% false negative, 0% false positive, 100% sensitivity, and 100% specificity after only 24 h enrichment followed by multiplex PCR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evaluating the differences between the candidate and reference method detection probabilities across all three surface types revealed that the candidate method was equivalent to MFHPB-30, while requiring significantly less time for detection.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>IEH Listeria system performed equivalently to the reference method, without being affected by the surface type and while decreasing the detection time to a total of less than 28 hours.</p>","PeriodicalId":94064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of AOAC International","volume":" ","pages":"422-428"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of AOAC International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoacint/qsaf013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Laboratory detection methods are commonly tested against gold standards and corresponding reference methods to confirm their suitability and efficiency.
Objective: The IEH Listeria Test System (multiplex PCR) was tested against Health Canada's reference method (MFHPB-30) for the simultaneous detection of Listeria spp. and Listeria monocytogenes on three different surfaces: plastic (PL), sealed concrete (SC), and stainless steel (SS).
Methods: The R2 medium was used for pre-enrichment of the samples at 35°C for 24 h, followed by the IEH Listeria multiplex PCR. Each individual surface coupon (PL, SC, and SS) was inoculated with either Listeria innocua, L. monocytogenes, or L. welshimeri along with two non-target microorganisms of concern and subjected to candidate (IEH Listeria multiplex PCR) and reference method (MFHPB-30) testing in an unpaired manner, including culture confirmation for the IEH method.
Results: The candidate method demonstrated 0% false negative, 0% false positive, 100% sensitivity, and 100% specificity after only 24 h enrichment followed by multiplex PCR.
Conclusions: Evaluating the differences between the candidate and reference method detection probabilities across all three surface types revealed that the candidate method was equivalent to MFHPB-30, while requiring significantly less time for detection.
Highlights: IEH Listeria system performed equivalently to the reference method, without being affected by the surface type and while decreasing the detection time to a total of less than 28 hours.