A pooled analysis of the side effects of non-invasive Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS).

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-02-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2025.1539416
Manon Giraudier, Carlos Ventura-Bort, Christoph Szeska, Mathias Weymar
{"title":"A pooled analysis of the side effects of non-invasive Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS).","authors":"Manon Giraudier, Carlos Ventura-Bort, Christoph Szeska, Mathias Weymar","doi":"10.3389/fnhum.2025.1539416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) is a promising technique for modulating vagal afferent fibers non-invasively and has shown therapeutic potential in neurological, cognitive, and affective disorders. While previous research highlights its efficacy, the safety profile of taVNS has been less extensively examined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study therefore aimed to systematically investigate side effects of taVNS in a large pooled dataset consisting of <i>n</i> = 488 participants, utilizing a standardized questionnaire to assess ten reported side effects. Analyses included effects of stimulation type (interval vs. continuous), stimulation duration, stimulation intensity and participant characteristics (age and gender) as potential modulators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings support the safety of taVNS, with minimal and mild side effects reported across participants (<i>M</i> = 1.86, <i>SD</i> = 1.36). Although participants receiving sham stimulation were 32.4% less likely to report unpleasant feelings compared to participants receiving taVNS, this effect was driven primarily by low-end ratings (specifically, a rating of 1, indicating <i>not at all</i> when experiencing the corresponding side effect), thus suggesting limited clinical relevance. Interval stimulation notably reduced the likelihood of some side effects, particularly for neck pain, dizziness and unpleasant feelings, suggesting potential for optimizing taVNS protocols. Stimulation intensity and duration showed few statistically significant, but clinically minimal (i.e., very small) effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, these findings demonstrate a favorable safety profile of taVNS, with mostly mild and transient effects, supporting its use as a suitable non-invasive tool in both research and clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":12536,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Human Neuroscience","volume":"19 ","pages":"1539416"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11841445/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Human Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2025.1539416","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) is a promising technique for modulating vagal afferent fibers non-invasively and has shown therapeutic potential in neurological, cognitive, and affective disorders. While previous research highlights its efficacy, the safety profile of taVNS has been less extensively examined.

Methods: This study therefore aimed to systematically investigate side effects of taVNS in a large pooled dataset consisting of n = 488 participants, utilizing a standardized questionnaire to assess ten reported side effects. Analyses included effects of stimulation type (interval vs. continuous), stimulation duration, stimulation intensity and participant characteristics (age and gender) as potential modulators.

Results: The findings support the safety of taVNS, with minimal and mild side effects reported across participants (M = 1.86, SD = 1.36). Although participants receiving sham stimulation were 32.4% less likely to report unpleasant feelings compared to participants receiving taVNS, this effect was driven primarily by low-end ratings (specifically, a rating of 1, indicating not at all when experiencing the corresponding side effect), thus suggesting limited clinical relevance. Interval stimulation notably reduced the likelihood of some side effects, particularly for neck pain, dizziness and unpleasant feelings, suggesting potential for optimizing taVNS protocols. Stimulation intensity and duration showed few statistically significant, but clinically minimal (i.e., very small) effects.

Conclusion: Overall, these findings demonstrate a favorable safety profile of taVNS, with mostly mild and transient effects, supporting its use as a suitable non-invasive tool in both research and clinical applications.

简介:经皮耳廓迷走神经刺激(taVNS)是一种无创调节迷走传入纤维的有效技术,对神经、认知和情感障碍具有治疗潜力。虽然以往的研究强调了它的疗效,但对迷走神经刺激疗法的安全性却没有进行广泛的研究:因此,本研究旨在系统调查由 n = 488 名参与者组成的大型汇总数据集中 taVNS 的副作用,利用标准化问卷评估报告的 10 种副作用。分析包括刺激类型(间歇与持续)、刺激持续时间、刺激强度和参与者特征(年龄和性别)作为潜在调节因素的影响:结果:研究结果支持 taVNS 的安全性,所有参与者都报告了极少且轻微的副作用(M = 1.86,SD = 1.36)。虽然与接受 taVNS 的参与者相比,接受假刺激的参与者报告不愉快感觉的可能性降低了 32.4%,但这一效应主要是由低端评分(具体而言,评分为 1 表示在经历相应副作用时完全没有)驱动的,因此表明其临床相关性有限。间歇性刺激明显降低了某些副作用的发生几率,尤其是颈部疼痛、头晕和不愉快的感觉,这表明间歇性刺激具有优化 taVNS 方案的潜力。刺激强度和持续时间几乎没有统计学意义,但在临床上影响极小(即非常小):总之,这些研究结果表明,taVNS 具有良好的安全性,大部分影响是轻微和短暂的,支持将其作为一种合适的非侵入性工具用于研究和临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.90%
发文量
830
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience is a first-tier electronic journal devoted to understanding the brain mechanisms supporting cognitive and social behavior in humans, and how these mechanisms might be altered in disease states. The last 25 years have seen an explosive growth in both the methods and the theoretical constructs available to study the human brain. Advances in electrophysiological, neuroimaging, neuropsychological, psychophysical, neuropharmacological and computational approaches have provided key insights into the mechanisms of a broad range of human behaviors in both health and disease. Work in human neuroscience ranges from the cognitive domain, including areas such as memory, attention, language and perception to the social domain, with this last subject addressing topics, such as interpersonal interactions, social discourse and emotional regulation. How these processes unfold during development, mature in adulthood and often decline in aging, and how they are altered in a host of developmental, neurological and psychiatric disorders, has become increasingly amenable to human neuroscience research approaches. Work in human neuroscience has influenced many areas of inquiry ranging from social and cognitive psychology to economics, law and public policy. Accordingly, our journal will provide a forum for human research spanning all areas of human cognitive, social, developmental and translational neuroscience using any research approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信