Species authentication in meat products sold in Kilosa District in Tanzania using HRM-enhanced DNA barcoding

IF 1.4 3区 农林科学 Q4 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Edward John Dule, Edson Kinimi, Gaymary George Bakari, Robert Arsen Max, Charles Moses Lyimo, James Richard Mushi
{"title":"Species authentication in meat products sold in Kilosa District in Tanzania using HRM-enhanced DNA barcoding","authors":"Edward John Dule,&nbsp;Edson Kinimi,&nbsp;Gaymary George Bakari,&nbsp;Robert Arsen Max,&nbsp;Charles Moses Lyimo,&nbsp;James Richard Mushi","doi":"10.1007/s00003-024-01532-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Species substitution in meat products is a common form of food fraud that raises ethical, religious, dietary, and conservation issues. Measures to monitor meat substitution are being implemented in many parts of the world. However, information on similar efforts in Tanzania is scarce. This study aimed to assess species authenticity in kebabs sold in the Kilosa District. During 4 months (November 2023 to March 2024), 100 processed kebabs were purchased from fast food outlets across 3 wards: Dumila (<i>n</i> = 49), Kimamba (<i>n</i> = 24), and Mikumi (<i>n</i> = 27). Species authentication was conducted using High-resolution melting analysis and DNA barcoding, targeting two mitochondrial markers: cytochrome oxidase 1 (<i>COI</i>) and <i>16 S</i> rRNA. Out of 100 kebabs, 64 were misidentified. Notably, goat-based kebabs were the most substituted, with 36 out of 43 (83.7%) containing different species: cattle (30), chicken (2), impala (1), and warthog (3). Out of 40 cattle kebabs, 18 (45%) consisted of meat from different species: chicken (7), goat (8), 2 impala (2), and 1 warthog (1). Chicken kebabs had only 7 undeclared cattle species, and all 3 samples sold as mutton kebabs were substituted with cattle (2) and goat (1). The findings indicate a high prevalence of species substitution in meat products within the Kilosa District. Undeclared wildlife species might represent illegal bushmeat harvests in the conserved ecosystems. Extensive meat inspections and educational interventions are recommended to ensure the integrity of the meat market, consumer trust, and the conservation of wildlife.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":622,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety","volume":"20 1","pages":"41 - 52"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00003-024-01532-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Species substitution in meat products is a common form of food fraud that raises ethical, religious, dietary, and conservation issues. Measures to monitor meat substitution are being implemented in many parts of the world. However, information on similar efforts in Tanzania is scarce. This study aimed to assess species authenticity in kebabs sold in the Kilosa District. During 4 months (November 2023 to March 2024), 100 processed kebabs were purchased from fast food outlets across 3 wards: Dumila (n = 49), Kimamba (n = 24), and Mikumi (n = 27). Species authentication was conducted using High-resolution melting analysis and DNA barcoding, targeting two mitochondrial markers: cytochrome oxidase 1 (COI) and 16 S rRNA. Out of 100 kebabs, 64 were misidentified. Notably, goat-based kebabs were the most substituted, with 36 out of 43 (83.7%) containing different species: cattle (30), chicken (2), impala (1), and warthog (3). Out of 40 cattle kebabs, 18 (45%) consisted of meat from different species: chicken (7), goat (8), 2 impala (2), and 1 warthog (1). Chicken kebabs had only 7 undeclared cattle species, and all 3 samples sold as mutton kebabs were substituted with cattle (2) and goat (1). The findings indicate a high prevalence of species substitution in meat products within the Kilosa District. Undeclared wildlife species might represent illegal bushmeat harvests in the conserved ecosystems. Extensive meat inspections and educational interventions are recommended to ensure the integrity of the meat market, consumer trust, and the conservation of wildlife.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The JCF publishes peer-reviewed original Research Articles and Opinions that are of direct importance to Food and Feed Safety. This includes Food Packaging, Consumer Products as well as Plant Protection Products, Food Microbiology, Veterinary Drugs, Animal Welfare and Genetic Engineering. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve Consumer Health Protection. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of Food and Feed Safety issues on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of Food and Feed Safety and Consumer Health Protection. Manuscripts – preferably written in English but also in German – are published as Research Articles, Reviews, Methods and Short Communications and should cover aspects including, but not limited to: · Factors influencing Food and Feed Safety · Factors influencing Consumer Health Protection · Factors influencing Consumer Behavior · Exposure science related to Risk Assessment and Risk Management · Regulatory aspects related to Food and Feed Safety, Food Packaging, Consumer Products, Plant Protection Products, Food Microbiology, Veterinary Drugs, Animal Welfare and Genetic Engineering · Analytical methods and method validation related to food control and food processing. The JCF also presents important News, as well as Announcements and Reports about administrative surveillance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信