Enhancing Foreign Language Learning Through Social Media Applications: A Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach

IF 2.8 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Yanping Geng, Reem Alshahrani, Hana Mohammed Mujlid
{"title":"Enhancing Foreign Language Learning Through Social Media Applications: A Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach","authors":"Yanping Geng,&nbsp;Reem Alshahrani,&nbsp;Hana Mohammed Mujlid","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) was employed to evaluate and rank language-learning applications based on criteria such as engagement, interactivity, feedback, content quality and usability. A pairwise comparison matrix was constructed, fuzzy logic was applied to convert qualitative judgements into numerical values, and these values were normalised to calculate crisp weights for each criterion. These weights assessed and ranked five popular language-learning apps: Duolingo, Busuu, Babbel, Memrise and Tandem. The results show Duolingo ranking highest with an aggregate score of 20.912, demonstrating superior performance across all criteria. Busuu and Babbel followed with scores of 18.541 and 18.485, respectively, while Memrise and Tandem scored 17.260 and 17.024. The FAHP methodology effectively addresses uncertainty in the evaluation process, offering a structured and reliable framework for users and educators to select the most suitable language-learning tool.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.70057","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) was employed to evaluate and rank language-learning applications based on criteria such as engagement, interactivity, feedback, content quality and usability. A pairwise comparison matrix was constructed, fuzzy logic was applied to convert qualitative judgements into numerical values, and these values were normalised to calculate crisp weights for each criterion. These weights assessed and ranked five popular language-learning apps: Duolingo, Busuu, Babbel, Memrise and Tandem. The results show Duolingo ranking highest with an aggregate score of 20.912, demonstrating superior performance across all criteria. Busuu and Babbel followed with scores of 18.541 and 18.485, respectively, while Memrise and Tandem scored 17.260 and 17.024. The FAHP methodology effectively addresses uncertainty in the evaluation process, offering a structured and reliable framework for users and educators to select the most suitable language-learning tool.

运用社交媒体促进外语学习:模糊层次分析法
采用模糊层次分析法(FAHP)根据参与度、互动性、反馈、内容质量和可用性等标准对语言学习应用程序进行评估和排名。构建两两比较矩阵,运用模糊逻辑将定性判断转化为数值,并对这些数值进行归一化,计算各判据的脆度权重。这些权重评估并排名了五个流行的语言学习应用程序:Duolingo、Busuu、Babbel、Memrise和Tandem。结果显示,Duolingo以20.912的总分排名最高,在所有标准中都表现出色。Busuu和Babbel的得分分别为18.541和18.485,Memrise和Tandem的得分分别为17.260和17.024。FAHP方法有效地解决了评估过程中的不确定性,为用户和教育者选择最合适的语言学习工具提供了一个结构化和可靠的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Education
European Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: The prime aims of the European Journal of Education are: - To examine, compare and assess education policies, trends, reforms and programmes of European countries in an international perspective - To disseminate policy debates and research results to a wide audience of academics, researchers, practitioners and students of education sciences - To contribute to the policy debate at the national and European level by providing European administrators and policy-makers in international organisations, national and local governments with comparative and up-to-date material centred on specific themes of common interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信