How I Do It: Teaching and Applying Qualitative Methods to Improve Surgical Simulation Design and Implementation

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Lou Clark PhD, MFA , Lauren Weaver MD , Eugene Floersch MPH , Mojca Remskar MD, PhD , Melissa Brunsvold MD , Anne Woll MS
{"title":"How I Do It: Teaching and Applying Qualitative Methods to Improve Surgical Simulation Design and Implementation","authors":"Lou Clark PhD, MFA ,&nbsp;Lauren Weaver MD ,&nbsp;Eugene Floersch MPH ,&nbsp;Mojca Remskar MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Melissa Brunsvold MD ,&nbsp;Anne Woll MS","doi":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To propose a simulation-based learning curriculum for trainees to comprehend and apply qualitative methodology.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>After learning theoretical principles of qualitative methodology through assigned readings and meetings with an expert, a surgical simulation fellow practiced applying grounded theory principles to evaluate a piloted simulation curriculum teaching surgery residents de-escalation communication skills. The simulation consisted of a “just-in-time” de-escalation training, 2 simulated patient (SP) encounters, and 2 learner debrief sessions. All components were video recorded, then transcribed. The first authors performed first and second level coding yielding thematic data.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Single academic institution</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>One surgical simulation fellow.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>About 3 themes emerged describing key aspects of the pilot simulation. The first, <em>Escalation Spirals and SP case portrayal,</em> consisted of the SP assuming the role of an agitated patient, as trained, with escalating and de-escalating emotions based on learner interactions. The second theme, <em>Safety Codes,</em> identified critical safety issues in the simulation. Lastly, <em>Rule Confusion</em> included the learner not understanding simulation logistics. These themes informed the team of what to keep and change for the next simulation pilot of the de-escalation curriculum.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Teaching qualitative methods in a practice-based learning format is feasible and has simultaneous potential to improve educational content and safety simulation-based curricula.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Education","volume":"82 5","pages":"Article 103481"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720425000625","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To propose a simulation-based learning curriculum for trainees to comprehend and apply qualitative methodology.

Design

After learning theoretical principles of qualitative methodology through assigned readings and meetings with an expert, a surgical simulation fellow practiced applying grounded theory principles to evaluate a piloted simulation curriculum teaching surgery residents de-escalation communication skills. The simulation consisted of a “just-in-time” de-escalation training, 2 simulated patient (SP) encounters, and 2 learner debrief sessions. All components were video recorded, then transcribed. The first authors performed first and second level coding yielding thematic data.

Setting

Single academic institution

Participants

One surgical simulation fellow.

Results

About 3 themes emerged describing key aspects of the pilot simulation. The first, Escalation Spirals and SP case portrayal, consisted of the SP assuming the role of an agitated patient, as trained, with escalating and de-escalating emotions based on learner interactions. The second theme, Safety Codes, identified critical safety issues in the simulation. Lastly, Rule Confusion included the learner not understanding simulation logistics. These themes informed the team of what to keep and change for the next simulation pilot of the de-escalation curriculum.

Conclusions

Teaching qualitative methods in a practice-based learning format is feasible and has simultaneous potential to improve educational content and safety simulation-based curricula.
我怎么做:教学和应用定性方法改进手术模拟设计和实施
目的提出一套模拟学习课程,帮助学员理解和运用定性方法。在通过指定的阅读和与专家的会议学习了定性方法论的理论原理之后,一位外科模拟研究员实践了应用基础理论原理来评估一个试点的模拟课程,该课程教授外科住院医生降级沟通技巧。模拟包括“及时”的降级训练,2次模拟患者(SP)接触和2次学习者汇报会议。所有组件都被录像,然后转录。第一作者执行第一和第二级编码产生主题数据。单一学术机构参与者1名外科模拟研究员。结果出现了大约3个主题,描述了飞行员模拟的关键方面。第一个,升级螺旋和SP案例描述,包括SP扮演一个焦虑的病人的角色,经过训练,基于学习者的互动,情绪升级和降级。第二个主题,安全规范,确定了模拟中的关键安全问题。最后,规则混淆包括学习者不理解模拟逻辑。这些主题使团队了解了降级课程的下一个模拟试点需要保留和更改的内容。结论以实践为基础的教学形式进行定性教学是可行的,并具有改善教学内容和安全模拟课程的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Surgical Education
Journal of Surgical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-SURGERY
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
261
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Education (JSE) is dedicated to advancing the field of surgical education through original research. The journal publishes research articles in all surgical disciplines on topics relative to the education of surgical students, residents, and fellows, as well as practicing surgeons. Our readers look to JSE for timely, innovative research findings from the international surgical education community. As the official journal of the Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS), JSE publishes the proceedings of the annual APDS meeting held during Surgery Education Week.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信