Using effective connectivity-based predictive modeling to predict MDD scale scores from multisite rs-fMRI data

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Peishan Dai , Zhuang He , Jialin Luo , Kaineng Huang , Ting Hu , Qiongpu Chen , Shenghui Liao , Xiaoping Yi , the REST-meta-MDD Consortium
{"title":"Using effective connectivity-based predictive modeling to predict MDD scale scores from multisite rs-fMRI data","authors":"Peishan Dai ,&nbsp;Zhuang He ,&nbsp;Jialin Luo ,&nbsp;Kaineng Huang ,&nbsp;Ting Hu ,&nbsp;Qiongpu Chen ,&nbsp;Shenghui Liao ,&nbsp;Xiaoping Yi ,&nbsp;the REST-meta-MDD Consortium","doi":"10.1016/j.jneumeth.2025.110406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a severe mental illness, and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) is commonly used to quantify its severity. Our aim is to develop a predictive model for MDD symptoms using machine learning techniques based on effective connectivity (EC) from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI).</div></div><div><h3>New method</h3><div>We obtained large-scale rs-fMRI data and HAMD scores from the multi-site REST-meta-MDD dataset. Average time series were extracted using different atlases. Brain EC features were computed using Granger causality analysis based on symbolic path coefficients, and a machine learning model based on EC was constructed to predict HAMD scores. Finally, the most predictive features were identified and visualized.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Experimental results indicate that different brain atlases significantly impact predictive performance, with the Dosenbach atlas performing best. EC-based models outperformed functional connectivity, achieving the best predictive accuracy (r = 0.81, p &lt; 0.001, Root Mean Squared Error=3.55). Among various machine learning methods, support vector regression demonstrated superior performance.</div></div><div><h3>Comparison with existing methods</h3><div>Current phenotype score prediction primarily relies on FC, which cannot indicate the direction of information flow within brain networks. Our method is based on EC, which contains more comprehensive brain network information and has been validated on large-scale multi-site data.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Brain network connectivity features effectively predict HAMD scores in MDD patients. The identified EC feature network may serve as a biomarker for predicting symptom severity. Our work may provide clinically significant insights for the early diagnosis of MDD, thereby facilitating the development of personalized diagnostic tools and therapeutic interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16415,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","volume":"417 ","pages":"Article 110406"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165027025000470","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a severe mental illness, and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) is commonly used to quantify its severity. Our aim is to develop a predictive model for MDD symptoms using machine learning techniques based on effective connectivity (EC) from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI).

New method

We obtained large-scale rs-fMRI data and HAMD scores from the multi-site REST-meta-MDD dataset. Average time series were extracted using different atlases. Brain EC features were computed using Granger causality analysis based on symbolic path coefficients, and a machine learning model based on EC was constructed to predict HAMD scores. Finally, the most predictive features were identified and visualized.

Results

Experimental results indicate that different brain atlases significantly impact predictive performance, with the Dosenbach atlas performing best. EC-based models outperformed functional connectivity, achieving the best predictive accuracy (r = 0.81, p < 0.001, Root Mean Squared Error=3.55). Among various machine learning methods, support vector regression demonstrated superior performance.

Comparison with existing methods

Current phenotype score prediction primarily relies on FC, which cannot indicate the direction of information flow within brain networks. Our method is based on EC, which contains more comprehensive brain network information and has been validated on large-scale multi-site data.

Conclusions

Brain network connectivity features effectively predict HAMD scores in MDD patients. The identified EC feature network may serve as a biomarker for predicting symptom severity. Our work may provide clinically significant insights for the early diagnosis of MDD, thereby facilitating the development of personalized diagnostic tools and therapeutic interventions.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
Journal of Neuroscience Methods 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
226
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuroscience Methods publishes papers that describe new methods that are specifically for neuroscience research conducted in invertebrates, vertebrates or in man. Major methodological improvements or important refinements of established neuroscience methods are also considered for publication. The Journal''s Scope includes all aspects of contemporary neuroscience research, including anatomical, behavioural, biochemical, cellular, computational, molecular, invasive and non-invasive imaging, optogenetic, and physiological research investigations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信