Physicochemical, Technological, and Structural Properties and Sensory Quality of Bread Prepared with Wheat Flour and Pumpkin (Cucurbita argyrosperma), Chayotextle (Sechium edule Root) and Jinicuil (Inga paterno Seeds) Flour

IF 2.6 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Miguel Martínez-García, Luz Alicia Pascual-Pineda, Martha Paola Rascón-Díaz, María Ximena Quintanilla-Carvajal and Maribel Jiménez-Fernández*, 
{"title":"Physicochemical, Technological, and Structural Properties and Sensory Quality of Bread Prepared with Wheat Flour and Pumpkin (Cucurbita argyrosperma), Chayotextle (Sechium edule Root) and Jinicuil (Inga paterno Seeds) Flour","authors":"Miguel Martínez-García,&nbsp;Luz Alicia Pascual-Pineda,&nbsp;Martha Paola Rascón-Díaz,&nbsp;María Ximena Quintanilla-Carvajal and Maribel Jiménez-Fernández*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsfoodscitech.4c0058510.1021/acsfoodscitech.4c00585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >To enhance the nutritional profile of bakery products made from refined wheat flour, alternative flours from pumpkin (CA), chayotextle (SE), and jinicuil (IP) were added. Their effects on the viscoelastic properties of dough and the physicochemical, physical, textural, storage, and sensory parameters of baked products were investigated. Adding these flours altered dough properties, reducing the flow rate and consistency coefficient to below 0.225 and 212.32 Pa/s, compared with the control dough́s values of 0.241 and 235.32 Pa/s. Bread with CA, SE, and IP flours had increased crumb density and hardness exceeding 0.30 g/cm<sup>3</sup> and 1.34 N, respectively. Starch recrystallization during storage was significantly reduced in breads with CA and IP flours by 10.50% and 12.37%, respectively, versus 22.64% in the control. These breads had a diverse sensory profile and high consumer acceptability. This study shows that plant-based flour can enhance bakery products’ nutritional, sensory, and storage qualities.</p>","PeriodicalId":72048,"journal":{"name":"ACS food science & technology","volume":"5 2","pages":"512–524 512–524"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS food science & technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsfoodscitech.4c00585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To enhance the nutritional profile of bakery products made from refined wheat flour, alternative flours from pumpkin (CA), chayotextle (SE), and jinicuil (IP) were added. Their effects on the viscoelastic properties of dough and the physicochemical, physical, textural, storage, and sensory parameters of baked products were investigated. Adding these flours altered dough properties, reducing the flow rate and consistency coefficient to below 0.225 and 212.32 Pa/s, compared with the control dough́s values of 0.241 and 235.32 Pa/s. Bread with CA, SE, and IP flours had increased crumb density and hardness exceeding 0.30 g/cm3 and 1.34 N, respectively. Starch recrystallization during storage was significantly reduced in breads with CA and IP flours by 10.50% and 12.37%, respectively, versus 22.64% in the control. These breads had a diverse sensory profile and high consumer acceptability. This study shows that plant-based flour can enhance bakery products’ nutritional, sensory, and storage qualities.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信