Identifying overlapping and distinctive traits of autism and schizophrenia using machine learning classification.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Jenna N Pablo, Jorja Shires, Wendy A Torrens, Lena L Kemmelmeier, Sarah M Haigh, Marian E Berryhill
{"title":"Identifying overlapping and distinctive traits of autism and schizophrenia using machine learning classification.","authors":"Jenna N Pablo, Jorja Shires, Wendy A Torrens, Lena L Kemmelmeier, Sarah M Haigh, Marian E Berryhill","doi":"10.1080/13546805.2025.2464728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and schizophrenia spectrum disorder (SSD) share some symptoms. We conducted machine learning classification to determine if common screeners used for research in non-clinical and subclinical populations, the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) and Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire - Brief Revised (SPQ-BR), could identify <i>non-overlapping</i> symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>1,397 undergraduates completed the SPQ-BR and AQ. Random forest classification modelled whether SPQ-BR item scores predicted AQ scores and factors, and vice versa. The models first used all item scores and then the least/most important features.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Robust trait overlap allows for the prediction of AQ from SPQ-BR and vice versa. Results showed that AQ <i>item scores</i> predicted 2 of 3 SPQ-BR factors (disorganised, interpersonal), and SPQ-BR <i>item scores</i> successfully predicted 2 of 5 AQ factors (communication, social skills). Importantly, classification model <u>failures</u> showed that AQ <i>item scores</i> could not predict the SPQ-BR <i>cognitive-perceptual</i> factor, and the SPQ-BR <i>item scores</i> could not predict 3 AQ factors (imagination, attention to detail, attention switching).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the SPQ-BR and AQ measure overlapping symptoms that can be isolated to some factors. Importantly, where we observe model failures, we capture distinctive factors. We provide guidance for leveraging existing screeners to avert misdiagnosis and advancing specific/selective biomarker identification.</p>","PeriodicalId":51277,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Neuropsychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Neuropsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2025.2464728","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and schizophrenia spectrum disorder (SSD) share some symptoms. We conducted machine learning classification to determine if common screeners used for research in non-clinical and subclinical populations, the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) and Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire - Brief Revised (SPQ-BR), could identify non-overlapping symptoms.

Methods: 1,397 undergraduates completed the SPQ-BR and AQ. Random forest classification modelled whether SPQ-BR item scores predicted AQ scores and factors, and vice versa. The models first used all item scores and then the least/most important features.

Results: Robust trait overlap allows for the prediction of AQ from SPQ-BR and vice versa. Results showed that AQ item scores predicted 2 of 3 SPQ-BR factors (disorganised, interpersonal), and SPQ-BR item scores successfully predicted 2 of 5 AQ factors (communication, social skills). Importantly, classification model failures showed that AQ item scores could not predict the SPQ-BR cognitive-perceptual factor, and the SPQ-BR item scores could not predict 3 AQ factors (imagination, attention to detail, attention switching).

Conclusions: Overall, the SPQ-BR and AQ measure overlapping symptoms that can be isolated to some factors. Importantly, where we observe model failures, we capture distinctive factors. We provide guidance for leveraging existing screeners to avert misdiagnosis and advancing specific/selective biomarker identification.

使用机器学习分类识别自闭症和精神分裂症的重叠和独特特征。
自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)和精神分裂症谱系障碍(SSD)有一些共同的症状。我们进行了机器学习分类,以确定用于非临床和亚临床人群研究的常用筛选器,自闭症谱系商(AQ)和分裂型人格问卷-简要修订(SPQ-BR)是否可以识别非重叠症状。方法:1397名大学生完成了SPQ-BR和AQ,采用随机森林分类方法对SPQ-BR单项得分对AQ得分及其影响因素的预测进行建模。模型首先使用所有项目得分,然后使用最不重要/最重要的特征。结果:强大的性状重叠允许从SPQ-BR预测AQ,反之亦然。结果表明,心理素质项目得分预测了3个心理素质因素(无组织、人际关系)中的2个,心理素质项目得分预测了5个心理素质因素(沟通、社交技能)中的2个。重要的是,分类模型失败表明,AQ项目得分不能预测SPQ-BR认知知觉因素,SPQ-BR项目得分不能预测3个AQ因素(想象、注意细节、注意切换)。结论:总体而言,SPQ-BR和AQ测量的重叠症状可与某些因素分离。重要的是,在我们观察模型失败的地方,我们捕获了独特的因素。我们为利用现有筛选器避免误诊和推进特异性/选择性生物标志物鉴定提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive Neuropsychiatry (CNP) publishes high quality empirical and theoretical papers in the multi-disciplinary field of cognitive neuropsychiatry. Specifically the journal promotes the study of cognitive processes underlying psychological and behavioural abnormalities, including psychotic symptoms, with and without organic brain disease. Since 1996, CNP has published original papers, short reports, case studies and theoretical and empirical reviews in fields of clinical and cognitive neuropsychiatry, which have a bearing on the understanding of normal cognitive processes. Relevant research from cognitive neuroscience, cognitive neuropsychology and clinical populations will also be considered. There are no page charges and we are able to offer free color printing where color is necessary.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信