Enhancing children's numeracy and executive functions via their explicit integration.

IF 3 1区 心理学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Gaia Scerif, Jelena Sučević, Hannah Andrews, Emma Blakey, Sylvia U Gattas, Amy Godfrey, Zachary Hawes, Steven J Howard, Liberty Kent, Rebecca Merkley, Rosemary O'Connor, Fionnuala O'Reilly, Victoria Simms
{"title":"Enhancing children's numeracy and executive functions via their explicit integration.","authors":"Gaia Scerif, Jelena Sučević, Hannah Andrews, Emma Blakey, Sylvia U Gattas, Amy Godfrey, Zachary Hawes, Steven J Howard, Liberty Kent, Rebecca Merkley, Rosemary O'Connor, Fionnuala O'Reilly, Victoria Simms","doi":"10.1038/s41539-025-00302-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Executive functions (EF) are crucial to regulating learning and are predictors of emerging mathematics. However, interventions that leverage EF to improve mathematics remain poorly understood. 193 four-year-olds (mean age = 3 years; 11 months pre-intervention; 111 female, 69% White) were assessed 5 months apart, with 103 children randomised to an integrated EF and mathematics intervention. Our pre-registered hypotheses proposed that the intervention would improve mathematics more than practice as usual. Multi-level modelling and network analyses were applied to the data. The intervention group improved more than the control group in overall numeracy, even when controlling for differences across settings in EF and mathematics-enhancing practices. EF and mathematics measures showed greater interconnectedness post-intervention. In addition, disadvantaged children in the intervention group made greater gains than in the control group. Our findings emphasise the need to consider EFs in their integration with co-developing functions, and in their educational and socio-economic context.</p>","PeriodicalId":48503,"journal":{"name":"npj Science of Learning","volume":"10 1","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11836118/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"npj Science of Learning","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-025-00302-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Executive functions (EF) are crucial to regulating learning and are predictors of emerging mathematics. However, interventions that leverage EF to improve mathematics remain poorly understood. 193 four-year-olds (mean age = 3 years; 11 months pre-intervention; 111 female, 69% White) were assessed 5 months apart, with 103 children randomised to an integrated EF and mathematics intervention. Our pre-registered hypotheses proposed that the intervention would improve mathematics more than practice as usual. Multi-level modelling and network analyses were applied to the data. The intervention group improved more than the control group in overall numeracy, even when controlling for differences across settings in EF and mathematics-enhancing practices. EF and mathematics measures showed greater interconnectedness post-intervention. In addition, disadvantaged children in the intervention group made greater gains than in the control group. Our findings emphasise the need to consider EFs in their integration with co-developing functions, and in their educational and socio-economic context.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

通过显式整合提高儿童的计算能力和执行能力。
执行功能(EF)对调节学习至关重要,是新兴数学的预测指标。然而,利用EF来提高数学水平的干预措施仍然知之甚少。193名4岁儿童(平均3岁);干预前11个月;111名女性(69%为白人)间隔5个月接受评估,103名儿童随机接受EF和数学综合干预。我们预先登记的假设表明,干预比平时的练习更能提高数学水平。对数据进行了多层次建模和网络分析。干预组在整体计算能力方面比对照组提高更多,即使在控制EF和数学增强练习的不同设置时也是如此。EF和数学测量显示干预后关联性更强。此外,干预组的弱势儿童比对照组取得了更大的进步。我们的研究结果强调,有必要考虑EFs与共同发展功能的整合,以及它们的教育和社会经济背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信