Knowledge co-production praxis in sustainability science: Insights from three contexts

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Emma Ligtermoet
{"title":"Knowledge co-production praxis in sustainability science: Insights from three contexts","authors":"Emma Ligtermoet","doi":"10.1111/1745-5871.12679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Knowledge co-production is needed as never before to support social change in the face of climate, water, biodiversity, and other sustainability crises. Co-production brings together diverse groups and their ways of knowing to generate new knowledges and practices that reconfigure or generate transformative social changes and that invite reflexivity. Within sustainability sciences, tensions exist between descriptive, analytical framings of co-production used to <i>interrogate</i> knowledge-power relations and instrumental or normative framings used to <i>build</i> such relations. The former has been criticised for being overly descriptive and difficult to translate into policy outcomes and the latter for failing to sufficiently interrogate power dynamics and for perpetuating existing inequities. As researchers, how are we to navigate this tension? Co-production praxis involves <i>reconfiguring</i> knowledge-power <i>relations</i> for just and transformative social changes. I suggest what is needed is a critical lens on those relations to underpin and guide feasible and action-oriented processes and outcomes for such changes. In three ways, I present and reflect on co-production contexts with different temporal, spatial and epistemological characteristics. These contexts are analysing historical co-production of knowledge of coastal freshwater floodplain Country of the Northern Territory, facilitating the Kunwinjku Seasons calendar and enabling reflexive co-production praxis with sustainability science researchers at a national science institution. I demonstrate the need within each context to weave analytical, practical, and reflexive work to reconfigure fairer societal outcomes and to pay greater attention to socio-institutional changes arising from our engaged work.</p>","PeriodicalId":47233,"journal":{"name":"Geographical Research","volume":"63 1","pages":"9-25"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1745-5871.12679","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geographical Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1745-5871.12679","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Knowledge co-production is needed as never before to support social change in the face of climate, water, biodiversity, and other sustainability crises. Co-production brings together diverse groups and their ways of knowing to generate new knowledges and practices that reconfigure or generate transformative social changes and that invite reflexivity. Within sustainability sciences, tensions exist between descriptive, analytical framings of co-production used to interrogate knowledge-power relations and instrumental or normative framings used to build such relations. The former has been criticised for being overly descriptive and difficult to translate into policy outcomes and the latter for failing to sufficiently interrogate power dynamics and for perpetuating existing inequities. As researchers, how are we to navigate this tension? Co-production praxis involves reconfiguring knowledge-power relations for just and transformative social changes. I suggest what is needed is a critical lens on those relations to underpin and guide feasible and action-oriented processes and outcomes for such changes. In three ways, I present and reflect on co-production contexts with different temporal, spatial and epistemological characteristics. These contexts are analysing historical co-production of knowledge of coastal freshwater floodplain Country of the Northern Territory, facilitating the Kunwinjku Seasons calendar and enabling reflexive co-production praxis with sustainability science researchers at a national science institution. I demonstrate the need within each context to weave analytical, practical, and reflexive work to reconfigure fairer societal outcomes and to pay greater attention to socio-institutional changes arising from our engaged work.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
12.10%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信