Chaos-enhanced metaheuristics: classification, comparison, and convergence analysis

IF 5 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Abdelhadi Limane, Farouq Zitouni, Saad Harous, Rihab Lakbichi, Aridj Ferhat, Abdulaziz S. Almazyad, Pradeep Jangir, Ali Wagdy Mohamed
{"title":"Chaos-enhanced metaheuristics: classification, comparison, and convergence analysis","authors":"Abdelhadi Limane, Farouq Zitouni, Saad Harous, Rihab Lakbichi, Aridj Ferhat, Abdulaziz S. Almazyad, Pradeep Jangir, Ali Wagdy Mohamed","doi":"10.1007/s40747-025-01791-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Chaos theory, with its unique blend of randomness and ergodicity, has become a powerful tool for enhancing metaheuristic algorithms. In recent years, there has been a growing number of chaos-enhanced metaheuristic algorithms (CMAs), accompanied by a notable scarcity of studies that analyze and organize this field. To respond to this challenge, this paper comprehensively analyzes recent advances in CMAs from 2013 to 2024, proposing a novel classification scheme that systematically organizes prevalent and practical approaches for integrating chaos theory into metaheuristic algorithms based on their strategic roles. In addition, a list of 27 standard chaotic maps is explored, and a summary of the application domains where CMAs have demonstrably improved performance is provided. To experimentally demonstrate the capability of chaos theory to enhance metaheuristic algorithms that face common issues such as susceptibility to local optima, non-smooth transitions between global and local search phases, and decreased diversity, we developed a chaotic variant of the recently proposed RIME optimizer, which also encounters these challenges to some extent. We tested C-RIME on the CEC2022 benchmark suite, rigorously analyzing numerical results using statistical metrics. Non-parametric statistical tests, including the Friedman and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, were also used to validate the findings. The results demonstrated promising performance, with 14 out of 21 chaotic variants outperforming the non-chaotic variant, whereas the piecewise map-based variant achieved the best results. In addition, C-RIME outperformed ten state-of-the-art metaheuristic algorithms regarding solution quality and convergence speed.</p>","PeriodicalId":10524,"journal":{"name":"Complex & Intelligent Systems","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complex & Intelligent Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-025-01791-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chaos theory, with its unique blend of randomness and ergodicity, has become a powerful tool for enhancing metaheuristic algorithms. In recent years, there has been a growing number of chaos-enhanced metaheuristic algorithms (CMAs), accompanied by a notable scarcity of studies that analyze and organize this field. To respond to this challenge, this paper comprehensively analyzes recent advances in CMAs from 2013 to 2024, proposing a novel classification scheme that systematically organizes prevalent and practical approaches for integrating chaos theory into metaheuristic algorithms based on their strategic roles. In addition, a list of 27 standard chaotic maps is explored, and a summary of the application domains where CMAs have demonstrably improved performance is provided. To experimentally demonstrate the capability of chaos theory to enhance metaheuristic algorithms that face common issues such as susceptibility to local optima, non-smooth transitions between global and local search phases, and decreased diversity, we developed a chaotic variant of the recently proposed RIME optimizer, which also encounters these challenges to some extent. We tested C-RIME on the CEC2022 benchmark suite, rigorously analyzing numerical results using statistical metrics. Non-parametric statistical tests, including the Friedman and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, were also used to validate the findings. The results demonstrated promising performance, with 14 out of 21 chaotic variants outperforming the non-chaotic variant, whereas the piecewise map-based variant achieved the best results. In addition, C-RIME outperformed ten state-of-the-art metaheuristic algorithms regarding solution quality and convergence speed.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Complex & Intelligent Systems
Complex & Intelligent Systems COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
297
期刊介绍: Complex & Intelligent Systems aims to provide a forum for presenting and discussing novel approaches, tools and techniques meant for attaining a cross-fertilization between the broad fields of complex systems, computational simulation, and intelligent analytics and visualization. The transdisciplinary research that the journal focuses on will expand the boundaries of our understanding by investigating the principles and processes that underlie many of the most profound problems facing society today.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信