LGBTQ+ Youth Advocacy in Gender-Sexuality Alliances: Factors that Coincide with and Predict Involvement over Time

IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
V. Paul Poteat, Wouter J. Kiekens
{"title":"LGBTQ+ Youth Advocacy in Gender-Sexuality Alliances: Factors that Coincide with and Predict Involvement over Time","authors":"V. Paul Poteat, Wouter J. Kiekens","doi":"10.1007/s10964-025-02158-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Advocacy carries the potential for LGBTQ+ youth (e.g., lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer youth) to have a voice against injustice, even while carrying potential risks, yet limited research has identified factors that correspond with their engagement in it. This study utilized three waves of data from 48 school-based Gender-Sexuality Alliances (GSAs) to consider whether taking on GSA leadership roles, victimization experiences, sexual orientation identity outness, gender identity outness, and positive self-image were associated with and predictive of advocacy over the school year. The sample included 181 cisgender LGBQ+ youth (50.8% youth of color; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 15.12 years, <i>SD</i> = 1.74) and 271 trans/nonbinary LGBQ+ youth (49.4% youth of color; <i>M</i><sub>age </sub>= 15.04 years, <i>SD</i> = 1.51). Cisgender LGBQ+ youth reported greater advocacy during periods when they took on more GSA leadership; also, those who, on average, took on more leadership than others reported greater advocacy over the study period than others, as did those who reported greater sexual orientation identity outness and a more positive self-image at the beginning of the study. Trans/nonbinary LGBQ+ youth reported greater victimization and greater leadership during periods when they reported greater advocacy; those who, on average, took on more leadership than others reported greater advocacy over the study period, whereas greater gender identity outness at the beginning of the study predicted lower advocacy over the study period. These findings carry implications for how GSAs could facilitate LGBTQ+ youth’s advocacy while attending to different barriers or support needs among youth.</p>","PeriodicalId":17624,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Youth and Adolescence","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Youth and Adolescence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-025-02158-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advocacy carries the potential for LGBTQ+ youth (e.g., lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer youth) to have a voice against injustice, even while carrying potential risks, yet limited research has identified factors that correspond with their engagement in it. This study utilized three waves of data from 48 school-based Gender-Sexuality Alliances (GSAs) to consider whether taking on GSA leadership roles, victimization experiences, sexual orientation identity outness, gender identity outness, and positive self-image were associated with and predictive of advocacy over the school year. The sample included 181 cisgender LGBQ+ youth (50.8% youth of color; Mage = 15.12 years, SD = 1.74) and 271 trans/nonbinary LGBQ+ youth (49.4% youth of color; Mage = 15.04 years, SD = 1.51). Cisgender LGBQ+ youth reported greater advocacy during periods when they took on more GSA leadership; also, those who, on average, took on more leadership than others reported greater advocacy over the study period than others, as did those who reported greater sexual orientation identity outness and a more positive self-image at the beginning of the study. Trans/nonbinary LGBQ+ youth reported greater victimization and greater leadership during periods when they reported greater advocacy; those who, on average, took on more leadership than others reported greater advocacy over the study period, whereas greater gender identity outness at the beginning of the study predicted lower advocacy over the study period. These findings carry implications for how GSAs could facilitate LGBTQ+ youth’s advocacy while attending to different barriers or support needs among youth.

LGBTQ+青年在性别-性联盟中的倡导:随时间的推移与参与一致并预测参与的因素
倡导为LGBTQ+青年(如女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和酷儿青年)提供了反对不公正的声音,即使存在潜在风险,但有限的研究已经确定了与他们参与其中相对应的因素。本研究利用了来自48个基于学校的性别-性联盟(GSA)的三波数据来考虑是否承担GSA的领导角色、受害经历、性取向认同的公开性、性别认同的公开性和积极的自我形象与学年的倡导相关和预测。样本包括181名顺性别LGBQ+青年(有色人种青年50.8%;年龄= 15.12岁,SD = 1.74),变性/非二元LGBQ+青年271人(有色青年49.4%;年龄= 15.04岁,SD = 1.51)。顺性LGBQ+青年在GSA担任更多领导职务期间,受到的支持更大;此外,在研究期间,平均而言,那些比其他人担任更多领导职务的人比其他人表现出更大的支持,就像那些在研究开始时表现出更大的性取向认同和更积极的自我形象的人一样。跨性别/非双性恋LGBQ+青年报告说,在他们受到更多倡导的时期,他们更容易受害,也更容易受到领导;在研究期间,平均而言,那些比其他人担任更多领导职务的人报告了更大的支持,而在研究开始时,性别认同的增加预示着在研究期间更低的支持。这些发现对gsa如何促进LGBTQ+青年的倡导,同时关注青年中的不同障碍或支持需求具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Journal of Youth and Adolescence PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
155
期刊介绍: Journal of Youth and Adolescence provides a single, high-level medium of communication for psychologists, psychiatrists, biologists, criminologists, educators, and researchers in many other allied disciplines who address the subject of youth and adolescence. The journal publishes quantitative analyses, theoretical papers, and comprehensive review articles. The journal especially welcomes empirically rigorous papers that take policy implications seriously. Research need not have been designed to address policy needs, but manuscripts must address implications for the manner society formally (e.g., through laws, policies or regulations) or informally (e.g., through parents, peers, and social institutions) responds to the period of youth and adolescence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信