Rapid Screening of Multiple Pesticide Residues in Lycii Fructus and Raw Juice Samples Using an Automated Sample Cleanup Platform Combined with GC-Q-TOF/MS.

Ting Chen, Renyuan Zhu, Wen Zhang, Yanli Xu, Xingzhi Wang
{"title":"Rapid Screening of Multiple Pesticide Residues in Lycii Fructus and Raw Juice Samples Using an Automated Sample Cleanup Platform Combined with GC-Q-TOF/MS.","authors":"Ting Chen, Renyuan Zhu, Wen Zhang, Yanli Xu, Xingzhi Wang","doi":"10.1093/jaoacint/qsaf008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lycii Fructus and its raw juice are widely consumed but may be contaminated with pesticide residues, posing health risks. Traditional methods for pesticide residue detection are often labor-intensive and time-consuming.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to develop a rapid, automated method for screening pesticide residues in Lycii Fructus and its raw juice using a combination of micro solid-phase extraction (μ-SPE) and gas chromatography-quadrupole-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC-Q-TOF/MS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An automated sample cleanup platform (PAL-RTC, Precision Automated Liquid Handler-Robotic Tool Change) was integrated with μ-SPE technology for sample preparation. Matrix-matched external standards were used for quantification, and method validation was conducted to compare μ-SPE with dispersive solid-phase extraction (d-SPE). Performance parameters including linearity, LOQ, recovery rates, and RSDs were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 84.5% of the pesticides showed strong linearity (R2 > 0.99) over the concentration range 2-1000 μg/L. The LOQ for 91.4% of pesticides was below 20 μg/kg, with recovery rates between 70 and 120% and RSD ≤20%. Screening detection limits (SDLs) were between 1 and 20 μg/kg, with 96.8% of pesticides having an SDL below 5 μg/kg. The μ-SPE method demonstrated superior reproducibility at the low spiking level (10 μg/kg), detecting 415 pesticides, compared to 369 for d-SPE. Analysis of 100 Lycii Fructus and 50 raw juice samples revealed the presence of 24 pesticides, including 3 restricted types.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The μ-SPE method, integrated with PAL-RTC and GC-Q-TOF/MS, offers a more efficient and accurate approach for detecting pesticide residues in Lycii Fructus and its raw juice compared to traditional methods, reducing labor and improving reproducibility.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Compared to the d-SPE method, the μ-SPE method integrated with PAL-RTC demonstrated better reproducibility and stability at low spiking levels, significantly enhancing the efficiency of sample cleanup.</p>","PeriodicalId":94064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of AOAC International","volume":" ","pages":"357-366"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of AOAC International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoacint/qsaf008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lycii Fructus and its raw juice are widely consumed but may be contaminated with pesticide residues, posing health risks. Traditional methods for pesticide residue detection are often labor-intensive and time-consuming.

Objective: This study aims to develop a rapid, automated method for screening pesticide residues in Lycii Fructus and its raw juice using a combination of micro solid-phase extraction (μ-SPE) and gas chromatography-quadrupole-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC-Q-TOF/MS).

Methods: An automated sample cleanup platform (PAL-RTC, Precision Automated Liquid Handler-Robotic Tool Change) was integrated with μ-SPE technology for sample preparation. Matrix-matched external standards were used for quantification, and method validation was conducted to compare μ-SPE with dispersive solid-phase extraction (d-SPE). Performance parameters including linearity, LOQ, recovery rates, and RSDs were evaluated.

Results: In total, 84.5% of the pesticides showed strong linearity (R2 > 0.99) over the concentration range 2-1000 μg/L. The LOQ for 91.4% of pesticides was below 20 μg/kg, with recovery rates between 70 and 120% and RSD ≤20%. Screening detection limits (SDLs) were between 1 and 20 μg/kg, with 96.8% of pesticides having an SDL below 5 μg/kg. The μ-SPE method demonstrated superior reproducibility at the low spiking level (10 μg/kg), detecting 415 pesticides, compared to 369 for d-SPE. Analysis of 100 Lycii Fructus and 50 raw juice samples revealed the presence of 24 pesticides, including 3 restricted types.

Conclusions: The μ-SPE method, integrated with PAL-RTC and GC-Q-TOF/MS, offers a more efficient and accurate approach for detecting pesticide residues in Lycii Fructus and its raw juice compared to traditional methods, reducing labor and improving reproducibility.

Highlights: Compared to the d-SPE method, the μ-SPE method integrated with PAL-RTC demonstrated better reproducibility and stability at low spiking levels, significantly enhancing the efficiency of sample cleanup.

GC-Q-TOF/MS联合自动清样平台快速筛选枸杞子及原汁样品中多种农药残留
背景:枸杞子及其原汁被广泛食用,但可能被农药残留污染,构成健康风险。传统的农药残留检测方法往往费时费力。目的:建立微固相萃取(μ-SPE)和气相色谱-四极杆飞行时间质谱联用(GC-Q-TOF/MS)快速、自动化筛选枸杞子及其原汁中农药残留的方法。方法:将PAL-RTC与μ-SPE技术相结合进行样品制备。采用基质匹配的外标进行定量,并对μ-SPE和分散固相萃取(d-SPE)进行方法验证。对其线性度、定量限(LOQ)、回收率、相对标准偏差(RSD)等性能参数进行评价。结果:84.5%的农药在2 ~ 1000 μg/L的浓度范围内呈良好的线性关系(R2 > 0.99);91.4%的农药LOQ < 20 μg/kg,回收率在70% ~ 120%之间,RSD≤20%。筛选检出限(SDLs)在1 ~ 20 μg/kg之间,96.8%的农药SDLs低于5 μg/kg。μ-SPE在低浓度(10 μg/kg)下重复性好,可检出415种农药,而d-SPE只能检出369种农药。对100份枸杞子和50份原汁样品进行分析,共检出农药24种,其中限用农药3种。结论:采用PAL-RTC和GC-Q-TOF/MS相结合的μ-SPE方法可有效、准确地检测枸杞子及其原汁中的农药残留,减少了劳动,提高了重现性。与d-SPE相比,μ-SPE与PAL-RTC相结合的方法在低峰浓度下具有更好的重现性和稳定性,显著提高了样品的净化效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信