Barriers and facilitators in implementing interdisciplinary play-based assessments in kindergarten: a Danish abductive study.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Calina Leonhardt, Dina Danielsen
{"title":"Barriers and facilitators in implementing interdisciplinary play-based assessments in kindergarten: a Danish abductive study.","authors":"Calina Leonhardt, Dina Danielsen","doi":"10.1080/13561820.2025.2463546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to examine the implementation of an interdisciplinary collaboration between health nurses and kindergarten pedagogues within a health promotion intervention designed to reduce health inequality among children. The collaboration took place during group- and play-based assessments of motor development in 4-year-olds. A total of 12 participant observations and 10 interviews (5 with health nurses and 5 with pedagogues), were used to explore the collaborative challenges and strengths. Through abductive analysis we examined four analytical themes: 1. The various roles assumed by the professions, 2. Their differences in motivation, 3. The professions' attitude toward each other and the collaboration, and 4. Diverse expectations regarding responsibility and follow up. These themes collectively offer insights into interdisciplinary collaboration in the context of health promotion and play-based assessments. The findings reveal differences in professional status and roles, with the health nurses assuming authoritative positions while the pedagogues adopt more assisting roles. Ambiguity regarding follow-up responsibilities furthermore emerges, potentially undermining the professionalism, empowerment and agency of the pedagogues. The study suggests future interventions to consider equity and professional recognition to enhance collaboration quality and implementation effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":50174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interprofessional Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interprofessional Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2025.2463546","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the implementation of an interdisciplinary collaboration between health nurses and kindergarten pedagogues within a health promotion intervention designed to reduce health inequality among children. The collaboration took place during group- and play-based assessments of motor development in 4-year-olds. A total of 12 participant observations and 10 interviews (5 with health nurses and 5 with pedagogues), were used to explore the collaborative challenges and strengths. Through abductive analysis we examined four analytical themes: 1. The various roles assumed by the professions, 2. Their differences in motivation, 3. The professions' attitude toward each other and the collaboration, and 4. Diverse expectations regarding responsibility and follow up. These themes collectively offer insights into interdisciplinary collaboration in the context of health promotion and play-based assessments. The findings reveal differences in professional status and roles, with the health nurses assuming authoritative positions while the pedagogues adopt more assisting roles. Ambiguity regarding follow-up responsibilities furthermore emerges, potentially undermining the professionalism, empowerment and agency of the pedagogues. The study suggests future interventions to consider equity and professional recognition to enhance collaboration quality and implementation effectiveness.

在幼儿园实施跨学科游戏评估的障碍和促进因素:一项丹麦诱拐研究。
本研究的目的是检查在旨在减少儿童健康不平等的健康促进干预中,保健护士和幼儿园教师之间跨学科合作的实施情况。这项合作是在对4岁儿童的运动发展进行小组和游戏评估时进行的。本研究共采用12次参与者观察和10次访谈(5次与保健护士进行访谈,5次与教师进行访谈)来探讨合作面临的挑战和优势。通过溯因分析,我们考察了四个分析主题:1。2.职业所扮演的各种角色;他们在动机上的差异;3 .各专业对彼此的态度和合作;对责任和跟进的不同期望。这些主题共同为健康促进和基于游戏的评估的跨学科合作提供了见解。调查结果显示,在专业地位和角色上存在差异,保健护士扮演权威角色,而教师则更多地扮演辅助角色。后续责任的模糊性进一步出现,可能破坏教师的专业性、授权和能动性。该研究建议未来的干预措施应考虑公平和专业认可,以提高合作质量和实施效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Interprofessional Care
Journal of Interprofessional Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
14.80%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interprofessional Care disseminates research and new developments in the field of interprofessional education and practice. We welcome contributions containing an explicit interprofessional focus, and involving a range of settings, professions, and fields. Areas of practice covered include primary, community and hospital care, health education and public health, and beyond health and social care into fields such as criminal justice and primary/elementary education. Papers introducing additional interprofessional views, for example, from a community development or environmental design perspective, are welcome. The Journal is disseminated internationally and encourages submissions from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信