Making long-acting treatment work: Tracing connections with extended-release buprenorphine depot through time

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Sandra Gendera, Kari Lancaster, Tim Rhodes, Carla Treloar
{"title":"Making long-acting treatment work: Tracing connections with extended-release buprenorphine depot through time","authors":"Sandra Gendera,&nbsp;Kari Lancaster,&nbsp;Tim Rhodes,&nbsp;Carla Treloar","doi":"10.1111/dar.14021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>How people connect with opioid agonist treatment is an ongoing concern. Extended-release buprenorphine depot (BUP-XR) has been designed with ‘retention’ in mind. It is important to consider what makes a difference to clients in helping them to stay connected to treatment over time.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We report findings from the third wave of in-depth interviews with participants (<i>n</i> = 26) in the Community Long-Acting Buprenorphine (CoLAB) study, tracing accounts of connection, disconnection and reconnection with BUP-XR since initiation into treatment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Changing situations in treatment delivery and in people's lives created conditions of possibility for connection and disconnection to treatment. Clients used BUP-XR in different ways. Personalisation of dosing regimens and stretching out of time between doses was common, creating a sense of stability for some. For others, this flexibility potentiated fragility in treatment connection. Disconnection from BUP-XR was common, but frequently this was not the ultimate outcome. Treatment connections were shaped by fluctuating life circumstances, with re-connections imagined, attempted and sometimes realised.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion and conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Clients' accounts reveal the complexities of how ‘long-acting’ treatments are made to work over time. Connecting with treatment in the long-term is a process, contingent on social relations, fluctuating life conditions and systems of care. Rather than treating connection and disconnection as opposites, we suggest seeing these as entangled and fluid elements of an ongoing process. What is needed is an adaptive and emergent conceptualisation of what ‘retention’ in treatment can mean, reflective of how people connect with their treatment and make it work, in practice.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11318,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol review","volume":"44 3","pages":"829-841"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dar.14021","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dar.14021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

How people connect with opioid agonist treatment is an ongoing concern. Extended-release buprenorphine depot (BUP-XR) has been designed with ‘retention’ in mind. It is important to consider what makes a difference to clients in helping them to stay connected to treatment over time.

Methods

We report findings from the third wave of in-depth interviews with participants (n = 26) in the Community Long-Acting Buprenorphine (CoLAB) study, tracing accounts of connection, disconnection and reconnection with BUP-XR since initiation into treatment.

Results

Changing situations in treatment delivery and in people's lives created conditions of possibility for connection and disconnection to treatment. Clients used BUP-XR in different ways. Personalisation of dosing regimens and stretching out of time between doses was common, creating a sense of stability for some. For others, this flexibility potentiated fragility in treatment connection. Disconnection from BUP-XR was common, but frequently this was not the ultimate outcome. Treatment connections were shaped by fluctuating life circumstances, with re-connections imagined, attempted and sometimes realised.

Discussion and conclusions

Clients' accounts reveal the complexities of how ‘long-acting’ treatments are made to work over time. Connecting with treatment in the long-term is a process, contingent on social relations, fluctuating life conditions and systems of care. Rather than treating connection and disconnection as opposites, we suggest seeing these as entangled and fluid elements of an ongoing process. What is needed is an adaptive and emergent conceptualisation of what ‘retention’ in treatment can mean, reflective of how people connect with their treatment and make it work, in practice.

长效治疗工作:追踪与丁丙诺啡缓释库的时间联系。
人们如何与阿片类激动剂治疗联系是一个持续关注的问题。丁丙诺啡缓释储存库(BUP-XR)的设计考虑了“保留”。重要的是要考虑什么对客户有影响,帮助他们长期保持与治疗的联系。方法:我们报告了社区长效丁丙诺啡(CoLAB)研究中对参与者(n = 26)进行的第三波深度访谈的结果,追踪了自开始治疗以来与BUP-XR的连接、断开和重新连接的记录。结果:治疗提供和人们生活的变化创造了连接和断开治疗的可能性条件。客户以不同的方式使用BUP-XR。给药方案的个性化和间隔时间的延长是很常见的,这给一些人带来了一种稳定感。对其他人来说,这种灵活性增强了治疗连接的脆弱性。断开与BUP-XR的连接是常见的,但这通常不是最终的结果。治疗连接是由波动的生活环境塑造的,重新连接是想象的、尝试的,有时是实现的。讨论和结论:客户的描述揭示了“长效”治疗如何随着时间的推移而发挥作用的复杂性。与治疗的长期联系是一个过程,取决于社会关系、波动的生活条件和护理系统。与其将连接和断开视为对立面,我们建议将它们视为正在进行的过程中纠缠和流动的元素。我们需要的是对治疗中的“保留”意味着什么有一个适应性的和新兴的概念,反映人们如何与他们的治疗联系起来,并在实践中使其发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol review
Drug and alcohol review SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
151
期刊介绍: Drug and Alcohol Review is an international meeting ground for the views, expertise and experience of all those involved in studying alcohol, tobacco and drug problems. Contributors to the Journal examine and report on alcohol and drug use from a wide range of clinical, biomedical, epidemiological, psychological and sociological perspectives. Drug and Alcohol Review particularly encourages the submission of papers which have a harm reduction perspective. However, all philosophies will find a place in the Journal: the principal criterion for publication of papers is their quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信