Affective and Social Predictors of Food Consumption During the COVID-19 Lockdown.

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Ana Stijovic, Paul Forbes, Ekaterina Pronizius, Anja Feneberg, Giulio Piperno, Urs M Nater, Claus Lamm, Giorgia Silani
{"title":"Affective and Social Predictors of Food Consumption During the COVID-19 Lockdown.","authors":"Ana Stijovic, Paul Forbes, Ekaterina Pronizius, Anja Feneberg, Giulio Piperno, Urs M Nater, Claus Lamm, Giorgia Silani","doi":"10.1016/j.biopsych.2025.02.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>COVID-19 lockdowns were linked to a surge in unhealthy food-related behaviors, potentially as an attempt to cope with disrupted social homeostasis. Here, we tested bidirectional associations between momentary psychological states and prospective food consumption, and the moderation by quality and quantity of social interactions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a preregistered ecological momentary assessment (EMA) study in Austria, Italy and Germany during the first COVID-19 lockdown. Multiple times a day for seven consecutive days, 798 participants (557 women, M<sub>age</sub> = 31.88) reported on momentary stress, mood, and wanting of food rich in sugar, fat and salt, consumption and enjoyment since the last prompt, and quantity and quality of social interactions since the last prompt.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Momentary stress was positively linked to food wanting, but not prospective food consumption. Mood valence and energetic arousal positively predicted prospective food consumption and enjoyment. The effect of mood valence was especially prominent when participants reported having more social interactions. Food consumption was linked to a prospective reduction in stress and an increase in calmness, suggesting it has regulatory functions for affective states. Exploratory findings show that some of these effects generalize to other reward types.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>During the lockdown, food may have been used to maintain an already positive affective state rather than upregulating an aversive state. Social facilitation of eating may have been especially prominent due to the prioritization of our social needs at the start of an extraordinarily challenging period, possibly orchestrated by the postulated social homeostasis system.</p>","PeriodicalId":8918,"journal":{"name":"Biological Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2025.02.007","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: COVID-19 lockdowns were linked to a surge in unhealthy food-related behaviors, potentially as an attempt to cope with disrupted social homeostasis. Here, we tested bidirectional associations between momentary psychological states and prospective food consumption, and the moderation by quality and quantity of social interactions.

Methods: We conducted a preregistered ecological momentary assessment (EMA) study in Austria, Italy and Germany during the first COVID-19 lockdown. Multiple times a day for seven consecutive days, 798 participants (557 women, Mage = 31.88) reported on momentary stress, mood, and wanting of food rich in sugar, fat and salt, consumption and enjoyment since the last prompt, and quantity and quality of social interactions since the last prompt.

Results: Momentary stress was positively linked to food wanting, but not prospective food consumption. Mood valence and energetic arousal positively predicted prospective food consumption and enjoyment. The effect of mood valence was especially prominent when participants reported having more social interactions. Food consumption was linked to a prospective reduction in stress and an increase in calmness, suggesting it has regulatory functions for affective states. Exploratory findings show that some of these effects generalize to other reward types.

Conclusions: During the lockdown, food may have been used to maintain an already positive affective state rather than upregulating an aversive state. Social facilitation of eating may have been especially prominent due to the prioritization of our social needs at the start of an extraordinarily challenging period, possibly orchestrated by the postulated social homeostasis system.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Psychiatry
Biological Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
18.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
1398
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Biological Psychiatry is an official journal of the Society of Biological Psychiatry and was established in 1969. It is the first journal in the Biological Psychiatry family, which also includes Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging and Biological Psychiatry: Global Open Science. The Society's main goal is to promote excellence in scientific research and education in the fields related to the nature, causes, mechanisms, and treatments of disorders pertaining to thought, emotion, and behavior. To fulfill this mission, Biological Psychiatry publishes peer-reviewed, rapid-publication articles that present new findings from original basic, translational, and clinical mechanistic research, ultimately advancing our understanding of psychiatric disorders and their treatment. The journal also encourages the submission of reviews and commentaries on current research and topics of interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信