A scoping review of interventions to reduce the environmental footprint of healthcare.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Anna-Veera Seppänen, Zeynep Or
{"title":"A scoping review of interventions to reduce the environmental footprint of healthcare.","authors":"Anna-Veera Seppänen, Zeynep Or","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2025.01.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The healthcare sector contributes significantly to global warming, yet strategies for reducing its impact are not well integrated into health policy. This scoping review aimed to identify the range of effective interventions that can reduce the environmental footprint of healthcare, and to provide an overview of their impact.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched for peer-reviewed articles published in English, French or Swedish between 2010 and September 2024 in Medline and Web of Science, following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines and the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews. Publications were selected by two researchers and a documentalist. Data from included studies were extracted and synthesized in tables and described in a narrative synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified seven systematic reviews and 44 original research articles. Most of the effective interventions targeted hospitals and varied from energy saving practices and reducing potent anaesthetic gases to changing care protocols and improving waste management. The measured impact of interventions was context-specific and depended on national energy sources. Only a few studies reported on the impact of structural and strategic changes in healthcare provision, across care settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is an urgent need for better understanding the costs and benefits of diffusing effective green interventions across care providers and developing more systemic approaches for optimising care provision and use, to achieve a meaningful impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":23508,"journal":{"name":"Value in Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2025.01.021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The healthcare sector contributes significantly to global warming, yet strategies for reducing its impact are not well integrated into health policy. This scoping review aimed to identify the range of effective interventions that can reduce the environmental footprint of healthcare, and to provide an overview of their impact.

Methods: We searched for peer-reviewed articles published in English, French or Swedish between 2010 and September 2024 in Medline and Web of Science, following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines and the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews. Publications were selected by two researchers and a documentalist. Data from included studies were extracted and synthesized in tables and described in a narrative synthesis.

Results: We identified seven systematic reviews and 44 original research articles. Most of the effective interventions targeted hospitals and varied from energy saving practices and reducing potent anaesthetic gases to changing care protocols and improving waste management. The measured impact of interventions was context-specific and depended on national energy sources. Only a few studies reported on the impact of structural and strategic changes in healthcare provision, across care settings.

Conclusions: There is an urgent need for better understanding the costs and benefits of diffusing effective green interventions across care providers and developing more systemic approaches for optimising care provision and use, to achieve a meaningful impact.

对减少医疗环境足迹的干预措施进行范围审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Value in Health
Value in Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
3064
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Value in Health contains original research articles for pharmacoeconomics, health economics, and outcomes research (clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes/preference-based research), as well as conceptual and health policy articles that provide valuable information for health care decision-makers as well as the research community. As the official journal of ISPOR, Value in Health provides a forum for researchers, as well as health care decision-makers to translate outcomes research into health care decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信