{"title":"Suppression of glycolysis decreases sugar-induced cell death in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.","authors":"Airat Valiakhmetov","doi":"10.1093/femsle/fnaf026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although 30 years have passed since the description of sugar-induced cell death (SICD), the specific molecular mechanism that triggers this process remains unclear. This paper attempts to shed light on the relationship between SICD and glucose catabolism. In yeast cells, glucose is involved not only in energy-producing processes but also in the synthesis of reserve hydrocarbons. It is known that disruption of trehalose synthesis leads to significant changes in the physiology of S. cerevisiae. The present study shows that deletion of the TPS1 gene resulted in a 44% suppression of SICD and a 75% reduction in the number of cells with excess ROS. The suppression was comparable to the suppression of SICD (38%) and ROS (71%) with deletion of the HXK2 gene. Since HXK2 is the first enzyme in the glycolytic pathway, the effect of two other key glycolytic enzymes on SICD was tested. Deletion of the TDH3 gene (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) resulted in a 39% suppression of SICD and ROS by 48%. Inhibition of Tdh3p with 1 mM iodoacetamide also suppressed SICD by 67% and ROS by 58%. Deletion of the PFK1 (phosphofructokinase 1) gene resulted in a complete block of SICD (97%) but unexpectedly resulted in a significant increase in the number of cells with excess ROS. The results obtained suggest that such a phenomenon as SICD is the result of an imbalance in the cellular pathways of glucose catabolism.</p>","PeriodicalId":12214,"journal":{"name":"Fems Microbiology Letters","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fems Microbiology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnaf026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Although 30 years have passed since the description of sugar-induced cell death (SICD), the specific molecular mechanism that triggers this process remains unclear. This paper attempts to shed light on the relationship between SICD and glucose catabolism. In yeast cells, glucose is involved not only in energy-producing processes but also in the synthesis of reserve hydrocarbons. It is known that disruption of trehalose synthesis leads to significant changes in the physiology of S. cerevisiae. The present study shows that deletion of the TPS1 gene resulted in a 44% suppression of SICD and a 75% reduction in the number of cells with excess ROS. The suppression was comparable to the suppression of SICD (38%) and ROS (71%) with deletion of the HXK2 gene. Since HXK2 is the first enzyme in the glycolytic pathway, the effect of two other key glycolytic enzymes on SICD was tested. Deletion of the TDH3 gene (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) resulted in a 39% suppression of SICD and ROS by 48%. Inhibition of Tdh3p with 1 mM iodoacetamide also suppressed SICD by 67% and ROS by 58%. Deletion of the PFK1 (phosphofructokinase 1) gene resulted in a complete block of SICD (97%) but unexpectedly resulted in a significant increase in the number of cells with excess ROS. The results obtained suggest that such a phenomenon as SICD is the result of an imbalance in the cellular pathways of glucose catabolism.
期刊介绍:
FEMS Microbiology Letters gives priority to concise papers that merit rapid publication by virtue of their originality, general interest and contribution to new developments in microbiology. All aspects of microbiology, including virology, are covered.
2019 Impact Factor: 1.987, Journal Citation Reports (Source Clarivate, 2020)
Ranking: 98/135 (Microbiology)
The journal is divided into eight Sections:
Physiology and Biochemistry (including genetics, molecular biology and ‘omic’ studies)
Food Microbiology (from food production and biotechnology to spoilage and food borne pathogens)
Biotechnology and Synthetic Biology
Pathogens and Pathogenicity (including medical, veterinary, plant and insect pathogens – particularly those relating to food security – with the exception of viruses)
Environmental Microbiology (including ecophysiology, ecogenomics and meta-omic studies)
Virology (viruses infecting any organism, including Bacteria and Archaea)
Taxonomy and Systematics (for publication of novel taxa, taxonomic reclassifications and reviews of a taxonomic nature)
Professional Development (including education, training, CPD, research assessment frameworks, research and publication metrics, best-practice, careers and history of microbiology)
If you are unsure which Section is most appropriate for your manuscript, for example in the case of transdisciplinary studies, we recommend that you contact the Editor-In-Chief by email prior to submission. Our scope includes any type of microorganism - all members of the Bacteria and the Archaea and microbial members of the Eukarya (yeasts, filamentous fungi, microbial algae, protozoa, oomycetes, myxomycetes, etc.) as well as all viruses.