Thrown into the fire: Do simulations in an introductory business course increase student engagement?

IF 6 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Gayle Randall , Scott Wysong , Ben Dilla , Michael Stodnick
{"title":"Thrown into the fire: Do simulations in an introductory business course increase student engagement?","authors":"Gayle Randall ,&nbsp;Scott Wysong ,&nbsp;Ben Dilla ,&nbsp;Michael Stodnick","doi":"10.1016/j.ijme.2025.101149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Administrators and educators have been debating how to improve the student learning experience for decades. More recently, there has been widespread discussion on the effect of experiential learning in the classroom to help develop student comprehension. Current research emphasizes the link between the experiential learning process and student outcomes, with the premise that experiential learning is a holistic method that focuses on student engagement. This study contributes to the community of experiential learning theory by examining its effect on multiple dimensions of engagement through business simulations in higher education. Specifically, we examined the difference in student engagement in two sections of an Introduction to Business course. One section used experiential learning (via business simulations), while the other section did not. Our results indicate that simulations do increase engagement, and thus, educators should consider using them in introductory courses (not just advanced or elective courses) in an effort to garner interest in business as a major.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47191,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management Education","volume":"23 2","pages":"Article 101149"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Management Education","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472811725000199","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Administrators and educators have been debating how to improve the student learning experience for decades. More recently, there has been widespread discussion on the effect of experiential learning in the classroom to help develop student comprehension. Current research emphasizes the link between the experiential learning process and student outcomes, with the premise that experiential learning is a holistic method that focuses on student engagement. This study contributes to the community of experiential learning theory by examining its effect on multiple dimensions of engagement through business simulations in higher education. Specifically, we examined the difference in student engagement in two sections of an Introduction to Business course. One section used experiential learning (via business simulations), while the other section did not. Our results indicate that simulations do increase engagement, and thus, educators should consider using them in introductory courses (not just advanced or elective courses) in an effort to garner interest in business as a major.
扔进火里:商业入门课程中的模拟能提高学生的参与度吗?
几十年来,管理人员和教育工作者一直在讨论如何改善学生的学习体验。最近,关于体验式学习在课堂上帮助培养学生理解能力的作用已经引起了广泛的讨论。目前的研究强调体验式学习过程与学生成绩之间的联系,前提是体验式学习是一种注重学生参与的整体方法。本研究通过在高等教育中进行商业模拟,考察了体验式学习理论对参与的多个维度的影响,为体验式学习理论的社区做出了贡献。具体来说,我们在商学导论课程的两个部分中考察了学生参与度的差异。其中一部分采用了体验式学习(通过商业模拟),而另一部分则没有。我们的研究结果表明,模拟确实提高了学生的参与度,因此,教育工作者应该考虑在入门课程(而不仅仅是高级课程或选修课程)中使用模拟,以努力吸引学生对商科专业的兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
25.00%
发文量
136
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Management Education provides a forum for scholarly reporting and discussion of developments in all aspects of teaching and learning in business and management. The Journal seeks reflective papers which bring together pedagogy and theories of management learning; descriptions of innovative teaching which include critical reflection on implementation and outcomes will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信