Partner treatment strategies for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea: Time for a reappraisal

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Lea Ben Said , Anne Conrad , Sander De Souza , Dulce Alfaiate , Florence Ader , Anne-Sophie Batalla , Matthieu Godinot
{"title":"Partner treatment strategies for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea: Time for a reappraisal","authors":"Lea Ben Said ,&nbsp;Anne Conrad ,&nbsp;Sander De Souza ,&nbsp;Dulce Alfaiate ,&nbsp;Florence Ader ,&nbsp;Anne-Sophie Batalla ,&nbsp;Matthieu Godinot","doi":"10.1016/j.idnow.2025.105038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Epidemiological treatment for suspected <em>Chlamydia trachomatis</em> (CT) and <em>Neisseria gonorrhoeae</em> (NG) infections is recommended for exposed partners before laboratory confirmation, within 14 days of exposure to reduce symptoms, break transmission chains, and prevent loss of follow-up. This approach may lead to potential antibiotic overuse by uninfected individuals, thereby enhancing antimicrobial resistance. This study investigated the accuracy of epidemiological treatment for CT and NG.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><div>Retrospective cross-sectional analysis conducted on asymptomatic exposed partners presumptively treated for CT and/or NG in Lyon’s Sexual Health Clinics between January and December 2023. The positive test rate results of exposed and treated patients were assessed, along with the frequency of potential antibiotic overuse (<em>i.e.</em>, receiving at least one unnecessary antibiotic treatment). The association of potential antibiotic overuse with pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV, age, gender, sexual orientation, and type of contact was also evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 141 patients who received epidemiological treatment, the concordance rate between the test and the reported exposure was 44.8 % for CT and 28.1 % for NG. The proportion of potential antibiotic overuse was 59.6 % (84/141). Potential antibiotic overuse was less common among patients exposed to CT than NG (<em>p =</em> 0.006). Self-identified women (compared with men) and heterosexual (compared with those with other sexual orientations) experienced lower rates of potential antibiotic overuse (<em>p =</em> 0.045 and 0.003, respectively)<em>.</em></div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Given the good follow-up at our clinics, waiting for the laboratory diagnosis before initiation of treatment appears reasonable and would avoid nearly 60% of unnecessary antibiotic treatments in CT and/or NG asymptomatic exposed partners.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13539,"journal":{"name":"Infectious diseases now","volume":"55 3","pages":"Article 105038"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious diseases now","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266699192500017X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Epidemiological treatment for suspected Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) infections is recommended for exposed partners before laboratory confirmation, within 14 days of exposure to reduce symptoms, break transmission chains, and prevent loss of follow-up. This approach may lead to potential antibiotic overuse by uninfected individuals, thereby enhancing antimicrobial resistance. This study investigated the accuracy of epidemiological treatment for CT and NG.

Patients and Methods

Retrospective cross-sectional analysis conducted on asymptomatic exposed partners presumptively treated for CT and/or NG in Lyon’s Sexual Health Clinics between January and December 2023. The positive test rate results of exposed and treated patients were assessed, along with the frequency of potential antibiotic overuse (i.e., receiving at least one unnecessary antibiotic treatment). The association of potential antibiotic overuse with pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV, age, gender, sexual orientation, and type of contact was also evaluated.

Results

Among 141 patients who received epidemiological treatment, the concordance rate between the test and the reported exposure was 44.8 % for CT and 28.1 % for NG. The proportion of potential antibiotic overuse was 59.6 % (84/141). Potential antibiotic overuse was less common among patients exposed to CT than NG (p = 0.006). Self-identified women (compared with men) and heterosexual (compared with those with other sexual orientations) experienced lower rates of potential antibiotic overuse (p = 0.045 and 0.003, respectively).

Conclusion

Given the good follow-up at our clinics, waiting for the laboratory diagnosis before initiation of treatment appears reasonable and would avoid nearly 60% of unnecessary antibiotic treatments in CT and/or NG asymptomatic exposed partners.
衣原体和淋病的伙伴治疗策略:是时候重新评估了。
目的:建议暴露性伴侣在实验室确诊前,在暴露后14 天内对疑似沙眼衣原体(CT)和淋病奈瑟菌(NG)感染进行流行病学治疗,以减轻症状,切断传播链,防止失去随访。这种方法可能导致未感染个体潜在的抗生素过度使用,从而增强抗菌素耐药性。本研究探讨CT和NG流行病学治疗的准确性。患者和方法:对2023年1月至12月在里昂性健康诊所推定接受CT和/或NG治疗的无症状暴露性伴侣进行回顾性横断面分析。评估暴露和治疗患者的阳性检测率结果,以及潜在的抗生素过度使用频率(即接受至少一种不必要的抗生素治疗)。潜在的抗生素过度使用与HIV暴露前预防、年龄、性别、性取向和接触类型的关系也进行了评估。结果:在接受流行病学治疗的141例患者中,CT检测与报告暴露的符合率为44.8 %,NG为28.1 %。潜在抗生素过度使用比例为59.6 %(84/141)。暴露于CT的患者中潜在的抗生素过度使用比暴露于NG的患者少(p = 0.006)。自我认同的女性(与男性相比)和异性恋者(与其他性取向者相比)潜在的抗生素过度使用率较低(p = 0.045和0.003)。结论:鉴于我们诊所随访良好,等待实验室诊断后开始治疗是合理的,可以避免近60%的CT和/或NG无症状暴露伴侣不必要的抗生素治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infectious diseases now
Infectious diseases now Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
116
审稿时长
40 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信