SEX DIFFERENCES IN MARKERS OF CEREBRAL SMALL VESSEL DISEASE IN PATIENTS WITH LOBAR INTRACEREBRAL HEMORRHAGE.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Diego Incontri, Sarah Marchina, Mitchell Wilson, Jia-Yi Wang, Merryjean Losso, Alexander Andreev, David Lin, Elizabeth C Heistand, Filipa Carvalho, Juliette Marchal, Anusha Nallaparaju, Vasileios Lioutas, Magdy H Selim
{"title":"SEX DIFFERENCES IN MARKERS OF CEREBRAL SMALL VESSEL DISEASE IN PATIENTS WITH LOBAR INTRACEREBRAL HEMORRHAGE.","authors":"Diego Incontri, Sarah Marchina, Mitchell Wilson, Jia-Yi Wang, Merryjean Losso, Alexander Andreev, David Lin, Elizabeth C Heistand, Filipa Carvalho, Juliette Marchal, Anusha Nallaparaju, Vasileios Lioutas, Magdy H Selim","doi":"10.1159/000542983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) is a major cause of primary lobar intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) due to cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) or hypertensive arteriopathy (HA). Sex differences in CSVD imaging markers and prevalence of CAA vs HA in lobar ICH remain unexplored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with primary lobar ICH who underwent MRI during hospitalization. We collected demographic, clinical, and outcome data. We reviewed MRIs for CSVD markers and calculated composite CSVD burden score (cCSVDbs). We assigned possible/probable CAA using Boston criteria 2.0. We grouped patients based on their sex and examined associations between sex and CSVD markers, cCSVDbs, or CAA. Kaplan Meier survival analysis was used to determine ICH-onset age among patients with first-ever symptomatic lobar ICH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>214 patients were included (102 (47.66%) women). Men were more likely to be current alcohol abusers (25.69%vs9.09%, p=0.002), current smokers (24.30%vs12.12%, p=0.024), and have coronary artery disease (26.79%vs15.69%, p=0.048), and hyperglycemia on admission (142.79±59.59vs126.58±37.29, p=0.019). Women were older (74.91±11.69vs69.28±14.53 years, p=0.002), and more likely to have possible/probable CAA in univariate (97.06%vs88.39%; OR 4.33, 95%CI 1.19-15.67; p=0.025) but not multivariate analysis. We found no significant differences in MRI markers of CSVD, cCSVDbs, or CAA. Among patients who presented with their first-ever primary symptomatic lobar ICH (n=187), men were younger than women (73vs77 years, p=0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our cohort of patients with primary lobar ICH, we found no significant difference in clinical and imaging characteristics between sexes. However, men were more likely to have a younger lobar ICH-onset age compared to women.</p>","PeriodicalId":12065,"journal":{"name":"European Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542983","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) is a major cause of primary lobar intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) due to cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) or hypertensive arteriopathy (HA). Sex differences in CSVD imaging markers and prevalence of CAA vs HA in lobar ICH remain unexplored.

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with primary lobar ICH who underwent MRI during hospitalization. We collected demographic, clinical, and outcome data. We reviewed MRIs for CSVD markers and calculated composite CSVD burden score (cCSVDbs). We assigned possible/probable CAA using Boston criteria 2.0. We grouped patients based on their sex and examined associations between sex and CSVD markers, cCSVDbs, or CAA. Kaplan Meier survival analysis was used to determine ICH-onset age among patients with first-ever symptomatic lobar ICH.

Results: 214 patients were included (102 (47.66%) women). Men were more likely to be current alcohol abusers (25.69%vs9.09%, p=0.002), current smokers (24.30%vs12.12%, p=0.024), and have coronary artery disease (26.79%vs15.69%, p=0.048), and hyperglycemia on admission (142.79±59.59vs126.58±37.29, p=0.019). Women were older (74.91±11.69vs69.28±14.53 years, p=0.002), and more likely to have possible/probable CAA in univariate (97.06%vs88.39%; OR 4.33, 95%CI 1.19-15.67; p=0.025) but not multivariate analysis. We found no significant differences in MRI markers of CSVD, cCSVDbs, or CAA. Among patients who presented with their first-ever primary symptomatic lobar ICH (n=187), men were younger than women (73vs77 years, p=0.001).

Conclusions: In our cohort of patients with primary lobar ICH, we found no significant difference in clinical and imaging characteristics between sexes. However, men were more likely to have a younger lobar ICH-onset age compared to women.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Neurology
European Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
51
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ''European Neurology'' publishes original papers, reviews and letters to the editor. Papers presented in this journal cover clinical aspects of diseases of the nervous system and muscles, as well as their neuropathological, biochemical, and electrophysiological basis. New diagnostic probes, pharmacological and surgical treatments are evaluated from clinical evidence and basic investigative studies. The journal also features original works and reviews on the history of neurology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信