Promises and uncertainties in the cultivated proteins market: Perspectives from Germany and Brazil

IF 6.8 1区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Germano Glufke Reis , Beatrice de Freitas Martins da Silva , Anna Loraine Hartmann , Terese E. Venus
{"title":"Promises and uncertainties in the cultivated proteins market: Perspectives from Germany and Brazil","authors":"Germano Glufke Reis ,&nbsp;Beatrice de Freitas Martins da Silva ,&nbsp;Anna Loraine Hartmann ,&nbsp;Terese E. Venus","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cultivated meat offers an alternative to ensure food security and mitigate greenhouse gas emissions from conventional animal production. As the innovation remains in its nascent stages, policymakers require a better understanding of the market’s potential, trajectory and future development perspectives. To support policymakers in developing flexible and effective policy frameworks for cultivated meat, we analyze perspectives about the trajectory of the cultivated meat market by 2040 in a comparative study of two countries, which are both major conventional meat markets and developers of alternative protein sources: Brazil and Germany. We use the Q-methodology to identify future perspectives and examine the influence of conventional meat industry incumbents on cultivated meat governance. Our sample includes 59 stakeholders working on cultivated and conventional meat. These perspectives can aid in decision-making related to investments in technological development, improvements in the sensory attributes of cultivated products, support for entrepreneurial ecosystems and startups, product hybridization, consumer and stakeholder engagement, the development of human capital, and regulatory schemes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":"131 ","pages":"Article 102820"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Policy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919225000247","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cultivated meat offers an alternative to ensure food security and mitigate greenhouse gas emissions from conventional animal production. As the innovation remains in its nascent stages, policymakers require a better understanding of the market’s potential, trajectory and future development perspectives. To support policymakers in developing flexible and effective policy frameworks for cultivated meat, we analyze perspectives about the trajectory of the cultivated meat market by 2040 in a comparative study of two countries, which are both major conventional meat markets and developers of alternative protein sources: Brazil and Germany. We use the Q-methodology to identify future perspectives and examine the influence of conventional meat industry incumbents on cultivated meat governance. Our sample includes 59 stakeholders working on cultivated and conventional meat. These perspectives can aid in decision-making related to investments in technological development, improvements in the sensory attributes of cultivated products, support for entrepreneurial ecosystems and startups, product hybridization, consumer and stakeholder engagement, the development of human capital, and regulatory schemes.
栽培蛋白市场的前景与不确定性:来自德国和巴西的观点
养殖肉类为确保粮食安全和减少传统动物生产的温室气体排放提供了另一种选择。由于创新仍处于初级阶段,政策制定者需要更好地了解市场的潜力、轨迹和未来的发展前景。为了支持政策制定者制定灵活有效的养殖肉类政策框架,我们对巴西和德国这两个国家进行了比较研究,分析了到2040年养殖肉类市场的发展轨迹。巴西和德国都是主要的传统肉类市场,也是替代蛋白质来源的发展中国家。我们使用q -方法论来确定未来的前景,并检查传统肉类行业现任者对养殖肉类治理的影响。我们的样本包括59个从事养殖和传统肉类的利益相关者。这些观点可以帮助制定与技术开发投资、改善栽培产品感官属性、支持创业生态系统和初创企业、产品杂交、消费者和利益相关者参与、人力资本发展和监管计划相关的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Policy
Food Policy 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.60%
发文量
128
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Food Policy is a multidisciplinary journal publishing original research and novel evidence on issues in the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of policies for the food sector in developing, transition, and advanced economies. Our main focus is on the economic and social aspect of food policy, and we prioritize empirical studies informing international food policy debates. Provided that articles make a clear and explicit contribution to food policy debates of international interest, we consider papers from any of the social sciences. Papers from other disciplines (e.g., law) will be considered only if they provide a key policy contribution, and are written in a style which is accessible to a social science readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信