A qualitative exploration of triggers for alcohol use and access to support during the COVID-19 pandemic among people identifying as problem drinkers in the United Kingdom

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Hadia Yaqubi, Tom May, Alexandra Burton
{"title":"A qualitative exploration of triggers for alcohol use and access to support during the COVID-19 pandemic among people identifying as problem drinkers in the United Kingdom","authors":"Hadia Yaqubi,&nbsp;Tom May,&nbsp;Alexandra Burton","doi":"10.1111/dar.14013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>A polarisation of drinking behaviour was observed during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, with some people reported to be drinking more alcohol and others less. We aimed to understand how and why the COVID-19 pandemic and associated restrictions impacted alcohol use and access to support and services during this time.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with 27 participants, including 20 people identifying as problem drinkers and seven alcohol service providers. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We identified two main triggers for alcohol use during the pandemic: (i) loss of daily routine and activity resulted in drinking to cope with social isolation and boredom; and (ii) drinking alleviated feelings of fear, anxiety and anger over the imposition of pandemic restrictions. Regarding access to services, two main themes were generated: (i) remote service provision was perceived as inferior to in-person services; and (ii) the need to offer choice and flexibility in how services were provided, with service providers reporting more positive experiences of online and telephone service delivery than service users.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion and Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This study provides new insights into potential triggers for alcohol use among people identifying as problem drinkers during the COVID-19 pandemic. The acceptability of remote forms of service provision were dependent on service user access to, and comfort with using technology. Hybrid delivery models may therefore be suitable in some but not all circumstances, and efforts should be made to promote equitable access to services.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11318,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol review","volume":"44 3","pages":"858-870"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dar.14013","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dar.14013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

A polarisation of drinking behaviour was observed during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, with some people reported to be drinking more alcohol and others less. We aimed to understand how and why the COVID-19 pandemic and associated restrictions impacted alcohol use and access to support and services during this time.

Methods

We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with 27 participants, including 20 people identifying as problem drinkers and seven alcohol service providers. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.

Results

We identified two main triggers for alcohol use during the pandemic: (i) loss of daily routine and activity resulted in drinking to cope with social isolation and boredom; and (ii) drinking alleviated feelings of fear, anxiety and anger over the imposition of pandemic restrictions. Regarding access to services, two main themes were generated: (i) remote service provision was perceived as inferior to in-person services; and (ii) the need to offer choice and flexibility in how services were provided, with service providers reporting more positive experiences of online and telephone service delivery than service users.

Discussion and Conclusions

This study provides new insights into potential triggers for alcohol use among people identifying as problem drinkers during the COVID-19 pandemic. The acceptability of remote forms of service provision were dependent on service user access to, and comfort with using technology. Hybrid delivery models may therefore be suitable in some but not all circumstances, and efforts should be made to promote equitable access to services.

对英国问题饮酒者在 COVID-19 大流行期间饮酒的诱因和获得支持的定性探索。
导读:在2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间,观察到饮酒行为的两极分化,据报道,一些人饮酒更多,而另一些人饮酒更少。我们的目的是了解COVID-19大流行和相关限制如何以及为什么在此期间影响酒精使用以及获得支持和服务。方法:我们对27名参与者进行了半结构化的定性访谈,其中包括20名问题饮酒者和7名酒精服务提供者。采用专题分析对数据进行分析。结果:我们确定了大流行期间饮酒的两个主要触发因素:(i)日常生活和活动的丧失导致饮酒以应对社会孤立和无聊;(二)饮酒减轻了对实施流行病限制的恐惧、焦虑和愤怒情绪。关于获得服务的机会,产生了两个主要主题:(i)远程服务的提供被认为不如面对面的服务;(ii)需要在提供服务的方式上提供选择和灵活性,服务提供商报告的在线和电话服务提供体验比服务用户更积极。讨论和结论:本研究为COVID-19大流行期间被确定为问题饮酒者的酒精使用的潜在触发因素提供了新的见解。远程服务提供形式的可接受性取决于服务用户对技术的获取和使用的舒适程度。因此,混合提供模式可能适用于某些情况,但并非适用于所有情况,应努力促进公平获得服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol review
Drug and alcohol review SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
151
期刊介绍: Drug and Alcohol Review is an international meeting ground for the views, expertise and experience of all those involved in studying alcohol, tobacco and drug problems. Contributors to the Journal examine and report on alcohol and drug use from a wide range of clinical, biomedical, epidemiological, psychological and sociological perspectives. Drug and Alcohol Review particularly encourages the submission of papers which have a harm reduction perspective. However, all philosophies will find a place in the Journal: the principal criterion for publication of papers is their quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信