Factors Influencing Decision Making for Gastrostomy Tube Placement for People Living with Serious Illness: A Scoping Review.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of palliative medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1089/jpm.2024.0062
Bridget J Perry, Tabitha H Kao, Brittney A Mancini, Lisa Moran
{"title":"Factors Influencing Decision Making for Gastrostomy Tube Placement for People Living with Serious Illness: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Bridget J Perry, Tabitha H Kao, Brittney A Mancini, Lisa Moran","doi":"10.1089/jpm.2024.0062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Gastrostomy (feeding) tubes are one way of managing swallowing impairments (dysphagia) in patients living with serious illnesses. For patients, families, and health care providers to make well-informed, preference-aligned decisions regarding gastrostomy tube placement, each group must understand the other's goals, concerns, and perspectives. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> Thus, the goal of this scoping review is to characterize the factors influencing gastrostomy tube placement decisions for people with serious illnesses. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We first identified relevant studies in a systematic manner, using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis flow diagram to model our screening process. We then used deductive thematic analysis to describe major themes, reporting the data with descriptive statistics such as percentages. Studies were categorized by their primary participant populations (patients, caregivers, and health care providers), with subthemes organized within the major themes of goals, concerns, considerations, and decisional preferences. <b><i>Results:</i></b> When considering gastrostomy tube placement, the top themes for patients were extending life (56% of studies), decisional control (56%), quality of life (48%), physical and social limitations and image (44%) and personal factors (44%). For caregivers, the primary themes were decisional control (71% of studies), extending life (50%), personal factors (50%), maintaining nutrition (43%), and knowledge (43%). Finally, health care providers prioritized decisional control (58% of studies), knowledge (53%), quality of life (47%), extending life (42%), and societal factors (42%). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Our results highlight key factors that may help center patient preferences when making gastrostomy tube-related decisions, as well as critical areas where more research is needed to help improve decision-making surrounding gastrostomy tube placement. Providing adequate knowledge and understanding patient preferences is critical for patients to make high-quality medical decisions regarding gastrostomy tubes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1258-1273"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2024.0062","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gastrostomy (feeding) tubes are one way of managing swallowing impairments (dysphagia) in patients living with serious illnesses. For patients, families, and health care providers to make well-informed, preference-aligned decisions regarding gastrostomy tube placement, each group must understand the other's goals, concerns, and perspectives. Objective: Thus, the goal of this scoping review is to characterize the factors influencing gastrostomy tube placement decisions for people with serious illnesses. Methods: We first identified relevant studies in a systematic manner, using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis flow diagram to model our screening process. We then used deductive thematic analysis to describe major themes, reporting the data with descriptive statistics such as percentages. Studies were categorized by their primary participant populations (patients, caregivers, and health care providers), with subthemes organized within the major themes of goals, concerns, considerations, and decisional preferences. Results: When considering gastrostomy tube placement, the top themes for patients were extending life (56% of studies), decisional control (56%), quality of life (48%), physical and social limitations and image (44%) and personal factors (44%). For caregivers, the primary themes were decisional control (71% of studies), extending life (50%), personal factors (50%), maintaining nutrition (43%), and knowledge (43%). Finally, health care providers prioritized decisional control (58% of studies), knowledge (53%), quality of life (47%), extending life (42%), and societal factors (42%). Conclusions: Our results highlight key factors that may help center patient preferences when making gastrostomy tube-related decisions, as well as critical areas where more research is needed to help improve decision-making surrounding gastrostomy tube placement. Providing adequate knowledge and understanding patient preferences is critical for patients to make high-quality medical decisions regarding gastrostomy tubes.

影响严重疾病患者胃造口管置放决策的因素:范围综述
背景:胃造口(喂食)管是治疗严重疾病患者吞咽障碍(吞咽困难)的一种方法。为了让患者、家属和医疗保健提供者在胃造口管放置方面做出明智的、符合偏好的决定,每个群体都必须了解对方的目标、关注点和观点。目的:因此,本综述的目的是描述影响严重疾病患者胃造口管放置决定的因素。方法:我们首先以系统的方式确定相关研究,使用系统评价的首选报告项目和元分析流程图来模拟我们的筛选过程。然后,我们使用演绎主题分析来描述主要主题,用描述性统计(如百分比)报告数据。研究按其主要参与者人群(患者、护理人员和卫生保健提供者)进行分类,并在主要主题(目标、关注点、考虑因素和决策偏好)中组织子主题。结果:在考虑胃造口管放置时,患者最关心的主题是延长生命(56%)、决定控制(56%)、生活质量(48%)、身体和社会限制和形象(44%)和个人因素(44%)。对于护理人员来说,主要的主题是决策控制(71%的研究)、延长寿命(50%)、个人因素(50%)、维持营养(43%)和知识(43%)。最后,医疗保健提供者优先考虑决策控制(58%的研究)、知识(53%)、生活质量(47%)、延长生命(42%)和社会因素(42%)。结论:我们的研究结果突出了在做出胃造口管相关决策时可能有助于集中患者偏好的关键因素,以及需要进一步研究的关键领域,以帮助改善胃造口管放置周围的决策。提供足够的知识和了解患者的偏好对于患者就胃造口管做出高质量的医疗决定至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of palliative medicine
Journal of palliative medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
345
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Palliative Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed journal covering medical, psychosocial, policy, and legal issues in end-of-life care and relief of suffering for patients with intractable pain. The Journal presents essential information for professionals in hospice/palliative medicine, focusing on improving quality of life for patients and their families, and the latest developments in drug and non-drug treatments. The companion biweekly eNewsletter, Briefings in Palliative Medicine, delivers the latest breaking news and information to keep clinicians and health care providers continuously updated.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信