Factors Influencing Decision Making for Gastrostomy Tube Placement for People Living with Serious Illness: A Scoping Review.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Bridget J Perry, Tabitha H Kao, Brittney A Mancini, Lisa Moran
{"title":"Factors Influencing Decision Making for Gastrostomy Tube Placement for People Living with Serious Illness: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Bridget J Perry, Tabitha H Kao, Brittney A Mancini, Lisa Moran","doi":"10.1089/jpm.2024.0062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Gastrostomy (feeding) tubes are one way of managing swallowing impairments (dysphagia) in patients living with serious illnesses. For patients, families, and health care providers to make well-informed, preference-aligned decisions regarding gastrostomy tube placement, each group must understand the other's goals, concerns, and perspectives. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> Thus, the goal of this scoping review is to characterize the factors influencing gastrostomy tube placement decisions for people with serious illnesses. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We first identified relevant studies in a systematic manner, using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis flow diagram to model our screening process. We then used deductive thematic analysis to describe major themes, reporting the data with descriptive statistics such as percentages. Studies were categorized by their primary participant populations (patients, caregivers, and health care providers), with subthemes organized within the major themes of goals, concerns, considerations, and decisional preferences. <b><i>Results:</i></b> When considering gastrostomy tube placement, the top themes for patients were extending life (56% of studies), decisional control (56%), quality of life (48%), physical and social limitations and image (44%) and personal factors (44%). For caregivers, the primary themes were decisional control (71% of studies), extending life (50%), personal factors (50%), maintaining nutrition (43%), and knowledge (43%). Finally, health care providers prioritized decisional control (58% of studies), knowledge (53%), quality of life (47%), extending life (42%), and societal factors (42%). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Our results highlight key factors that may help center patient preferences when making gastrostomy tube-related decisions, as well as critical areas where more research is needed to help improve decision-making surrounding gastrostomy tube placement. Providing adequate knowledge and understanding patient preferences is critical for patients to make high-quality medical decisions regarding gastrostomy tubes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2024.0062","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gastrostomy (feeding) tubes are one way of managing swallowing impairments (dysphagia) in patients living with serious illnesses. For patients, families, and health care providers to make well-informed, preference-aligned decisions regarding gastrostomy tube placement, each group must understand the other's goals, concerns, and perspectives. Objective: Thus, the goal of this scoping review is to characterize the factors influencing gastrostomy tube placement decisions for people with serious illnesses. Methods: We first identified relevant studies in a systematic manner, using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis flow diagram to model our screening process. We then used deductive thematic analysis to describe major themes, reporting the data with descriptive statistics such as percentages. Studies were categorized by their primary participant populations (patients, caregivers, and health care providers), with subthemes organized within the major themes of goals, concerns, considerations, and decisional preferences. Results: When considering gastrostomy tube placement, the top themes for patients were extending life (56% of studies), decisional control (56%), quality of life (48%), physical and social limitations and image (44%) and personal factors (44%). For caregivers, the primary themes were decisional control (71% of studies), extending life (50%), personal factors (50%), maintaining nutrition (43%), and knowledge (43%). Finally, health care providers prioritized decisional control (58% of studies), knowledge (53%), quality of life (47%), extending life (42%), and societal factors (42%). Conclusions: Our results highlight key factors that may help center patient preferences when making gastrostomy tube-related decisions, as well as critical areas where more research is needed to help improve decision-making surrounding gastrostomy tube placement. Providing adequate knowledge and understanding patient preferences is critical for patients to make high-quality medical decisions regarding gastrostomy tubes.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of palliative medicine
Journal of palliative medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
345
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Palliative Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed journal covering medical, psychosocial, policy, and legal issues in end-of-life care and relief of suffering for patients with intractable pain. The Journal presents essential information for professionals in hospice/palliative medicine, focusing on improving quality of life for patients and their families, and the latest developments in drug and non-drug treatments. The companion biweekly eNewsletter, Briefings in Palliative Medicine, delivers the latest breaking news and information to keep clinicians and health care providers continuously updated.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信