Development and Validation of Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale Short Form for Efficient Specialist Palliative Care Screening in Oncology (ScreeningPALL): A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Evelyn Müller, Michael J Müller, Paul Sölder, Beate Rautenberg, Maryam En-Nosse, Gerhild Becker
{"title":"Development and Validation of Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale Short Form for Efficient Specialist Palliative Care Screening in Oncology (ScreeningPALL): A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Evelyn Müller, Michael J Müller, Paul Sölder, Beate Rautenberg, Maryam En-Nosse, Gerhild Becker","doi":"10.1089/jpm.2024.0343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Widespread implementation of specialist palliative care screening in oncology can be facilitated by efficient screening tools. It has been shown that patient-reported outcome measures are useful as screening tools and might reduce staff effort. Short forms could further improve feasibility. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> Development and validation of a short form of the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS) for use as a screening tool for specialist palliative care need in patients with incurable cancer. <b><i>Design:</i></b> In a cross-sectional study, patients completed the IPOS. In an independent process, the palliative care consultation service assessed specialist palliative care need in each patient through multiprofessional case review (reference standard). Statistical analysis included bootstrapping and binary logistic regression to select suitable items for an IPOS short form and receiver operating characteristics analyses for validation. <b><i>Setting/Subjects:</i></b> The analysis included 205 hospital episodes of 194 inpatients and outpatients with incurable cancer (prognosis <2 years) at a German Comprehensive Cancer Center. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Possible IPOS short forms of two to eight items showed acceptable or excellent accuracy in predicting specialist palliative care need. A six-item IPOS short form that included the most predictive items of each of the three IPOS dimensions identified specialist palliative care need with 87.5% sensitivity (specificity = 56.4%; area under the curve = 0.786). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> IPOS short forms can facilitate efficient screening for specialist palliative care need, and the validation results are comparable to the full version of IPOS. Results also indicate which symptoms and problems might be most relevant as red flags in routine data or staff-based screening approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":16656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2024.0343","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Widespread implementation of specialist palliative care screening in oncology can be facilitated by efficient screening tools. It has been shown that patient-reported outcome measures are useful as screening tools and might reduce staff effort. Short forms could further improve feasibility. Objective: Development and validation of a short form of the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS) for use as a screening tool for specialist palliative care need in patients with incurable cancer. Design: In a cross-sectional study, patients completed the IPOS. In an independent process, the palliative care consultation service assessed specialist palliative care need in each patient through multiprofessional case review (reference standard). Statistical analysis included bootstrapping and binary logistic regression to select suitable items for an IPOS short form and receiver operating characteristics analyses for validation. Setting/Subjects: The analysis included 205 hospital episodes of 194 inpatients and outpatients with incurable cancer (prognosis <2 years) at a German Comprehensive Cancer Center. Results: Possible IPOS short forms of two to eight items showed acceptable or excellent accuracy in predicting specialist palliative care need. A six-item IPOS short form that included the most predictive items of each of the three IPOS dimensions identified specialist palliative care need with 87.5% sensitivity (specificity = 56.4%; area under the curve = 0.786). Conclusions: IPOS short forms can facilitate efficient screening for specialist palliative care need, and the validation results are comparable to the full version of IPOS. Results also indicate which symptoms and problems might be most relevant as red flags in routine data or staff-based screening approaches.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of palliative medicine
Journal of palliative medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
345
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Palliative Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed journal covering medical, psychosocial, policy, and legal issues in end-of-life care and relief of suffering for patients with intractable pain. The Journal presents essential information for professionals in hospice/palliative medicine, focusing on improving quality of life for patients and their families, and the latest developments in drug and non-drug treatments. The companion biweekly eNewsletter, Briefings in Palliative Medicine, delivers the latest breaking news and information to keep clinicians and health care providers continuously updated.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信