Comparison of methods for the preparation of single-cell suspensions of rat retina and immunophenotyping by flow cytometry

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Qingyao Wang , Xiandan Zhu , Xing Zhang , Yong Xia , Xuesong Tian
{"title":"Comparison of methods for the preparation of single-cell suspensions of rat retina and immunophenotyping by flow cytometry","authors":"Qingyao Wang ,&nbsp;Xiandan Zhu ,&nbsp;Xing Zhang ,&nbsp;Yong Xia ,&nbsp;Xuesong Tian","doi":"10.1016/j.jneumeth.2025.110384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Although the eye has traditionally been considered an immune-privileged organ, progressive studies have re-evaluated the role of the immune response in retinopathy. The application of flow cytometry for immunophenotyping analysis of retinal single-cell suspensions has gradually attracted attention.</div></div><div><h3>New methods</h3><div>We dissociated the retinal tissue using trypsin digestion, papain digestion, mechanical grinding treatment and liberase + DNase Ⅰ digestion, respectively. Subsequently we assessed the quality of cell suspension (clumping rate, concentration and viability) with two different dyes, Trypan Blue (TPB) and Acridine Orange/Propidium Iodide (AO/PI). We distinguished T cells and their sub-populations by flow cytometry. Furthermore, we analyzed their immune responses to evaluate those four methods for preparing retinal single-cell suspension.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The AO/PI staining method enables a rapid and precise evaluation of cell quality of retinal single cell suspensions, while TPB staining has limitations. Flow cytometric analysis showed that single cell suspensions dispersed with papain and trypsin exhibited reduced cell adhesion. However, trypsin digestion may affect antibody binding. The mechanical grinding treatment reduced cell yield and was prone to double-positivity. The number of cells within the cell-circle gate is significantly limited in the Liberase + DNase I digestion method.</div></div><div><h3>Comparison with existing methods</h3><div>The AO/PI staining method was employed to assess the quality of retinal single-cell suspensions. T cells and their subpopulations in retinal tissues were analyzed by flow cytometry. These results were integrated to evaluate the optimal preparation protocol for retinal single-cell suspensions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Papain digestion is a superior method for preparing retinal single-cell suspensions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16415,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","volume":"417 ","pages":"Article 110384"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165027025000251","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Although the eye has traditionally been considered an immune-privileged organ, progressive studies have re-evaluated the role of the immune response in retinopathy. The application of flow cytometry for immunophenotyping analysis of retinal single-cell suspensions has gradually attracted attention.

New methods

We dissociated the retinal tissue using trypsin digestion, papain digestion, mechanical grinding treatment and liberase + DNase Ⅰ digestion, respectively. Subsequently we assessed the quality of cell suspension (clumping rate, concentration and viability) with two different dyes, Trypan Blue (TPB) and Acridine Orange/Propidium Iodide (AO/PI). We distinguished T cells and their sub-populations by flow cytometry. Furthermore, we analyzed their immune responses to evaluate those four methods for preparing retinal single-cell suspension.

Results

The AO/PI staining method enables a rapid and precise evaluation of cell quality of retinal single cell suspensions, while TPB staining has limitations. Flow cytometric analysis showed that single cell suspensions dispersed with papain and trypsin exhibited reduced cell adhesion. However, trypsin digestion may affect antibody binding. The mechanical grinding treatment reduced cell yield and was prone to double-positivity. The number of cells within the cell-circle gate is significantly limited in the Liberase + DNase I digestion method.

Comparison with existing methods

The AO/PI staining method was employed to assess the quality of retinal single-cell suspensions. T cells and their subpopulations in retinal tissues were analyzed by flow cytometry. These results were integrated to evaluate the optimal preparation protocol for retinal single-cell suspensions.

Conclusions

Papain digestion is a superior method for preparing retinal single-cell suspensions.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
Journal of Neuroscience Methods 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
226
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuroscience Methods publishes papers that describe new methods that are specifically for neuroscience research conducted in invertebrates, vertebrates or in man. Major methodological improvements or important refinements of established neuroscience methods are also considered for publication. The Journal''s Scope includes all aspects of contemporary neuroscience research, including anatomical, behavioural, biochemical, cellular, computational, molecular, invasive and non-invasive imaging, optogenetic, and physiological research investigations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信