{"title":"Estimating low-opportunity-cost feed","authors":"Yi Gong, Yi Yang","doi":"10.1038/s43016-025-01116-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94151,"journal":{"name":"Nature food","volume":"6 2","pages":"134-136"},"PeriodicalIF":23.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature food","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43016-025-01116-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
源自 Q. Fang 等人的文章,《自然-食品》https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-023-00813-x (2023)肉类消费的增长带动了全球对动物饲料的需求,导致了森林砍伐、碳排放和生物多样性的丧失,凸显了改善饲料生产环境可持续性的必要性1。Fang 及其同事2 建立了一个线性饲料分配优化模型,并估计在中国给动物饲喂更多的低机会成本产品(LCF),如食物垃圾和副产品,可产生巨大的与土地利用相关的环境效益。虽然他们的研究有助于推动可持续饲料替代品的研究,但我们对其模型的一些关键假设提出了质疑,并注意到他们的一些预测与观察结果之间存在重大差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。