Cost-Effectiveness of a Digitally Supported Care Management Program for Caregivers of People With Dementia

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Michelle Pfaff MSc , Wolfgang Hoffmann MD, MPH , Melanie Boekholt MA , Olga Biernetzky PhD , Iris Blotenberg PhD , Dilshad Afrin MSc , Moritz Platen PhD , Stefan Teipel MD , Jochen René Thyrian PhD , Ingo Kilimann MD , Bernhard Michalowsky PhD
{"title":"Cost-Effectiveness of a Digitally Supported Care Management Program for Caregivers of People With Dementia","authors":"Michelle Pfaff MSc ,&nbsp;Wolfgang Hoffmann MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Melanie Boekholt MA ,&nbsp;Olga Biernetzky PhD ,&nbsp;Iris Blotenberg PhD ,&nbsp;Dilshad Afrin MSc ,&nbsp;Moritz Platen PhD ,&nbsp;Stefan Teipel MD ,&nbsp;Jochen René Thyrian PhD ,&nbsp;Ingo Kilimann MD ,&nbsp;Bernhard Michalowsky PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2025.01.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To examine the cost-effectiveness of a digitally supported care management system (CMS) for caregivers of people with dementia (PwD) compared with usual care.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The analysis was based on 192 caregivers (<em>n</em> = 96 CMS, <em>n</em> = 96 usual care) of PwD in a cluster-randomized controlled trial testing a digitally supported CMS, aiming to identify and address caregivers’ unmet needs and develop and implement an individualized support and care plan over 6 months. Incremental costs from the public-payer and societal perspectives, quality-adjusted life years (QALY), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio 6 months after baseline were calculated using multivariate regression models. We assessed the probability of cost-effectiveness using a range of willingness-to-pay thresholds.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Caregivers in the intervention group gained QALYs (+0.004 [95% CI −0.003 to 0.012], <em>P</em> value = .225) and had lower costs from the public payer (−378€ [1926-1168], <em>P</em> value = .630), but higher costs from the societal perspective (+1324 [−3634 to 6284], <em>P</em> value = .599). The intervention dominated usual care from the payer perspective, whereas the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was €331 000/QALY from a societal perspective. The probability of cost-effectiveness was 72% and 79% from the public payer and 33% and 35% from a societal perspective at the willingness-to-pay thresholds threshold of €40 000 and €80 000/QALY gained.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>CMS was likely cost-effective from the payer but not from a societal perspective, underlining the importance of informal care. The gain in QALY was marginal and could be due to the short observation period. Focusing on both the caregiver and the PwD, rather than assessing the PwD needs through the caregiver, could improve the cost-effectiveness results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23508,"journal":{"name":"Value in Health","volume":"28 4","pages":"Pages 527-535"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098301525000385","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To examine the cost-effectiveness of a digitally supported care management system (CMS) for caregivers of people with dementia (PwD) compared with usual care.

Methods

The analysis was based on 192 caregivers (n = 96 CMS, n = 96 usual care) of PwD in a cluster-randomized controlled trial testing a digitally supported CMS, aiming to identify and address caregivers’ unmet needs and develop and implement an individualized support and care plan over 6 months. Incremental costs from the public-payer and societal perspectives, quality-adjusted life years (QALY), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio 6 months after baseline were calculated using multivariate regression models. We assessed the probability of cost-effectiveness using a range of willingness-to-pay thresholds.

Results

Caregivers in the intervention group gained QALYs (+0.004 [95% CI −0.003 to 0.012], P value = .225) and had lower costs from the public payer (−378€ [1926-1168], P value = .630), but higher costs from the societal perspective (+1324 [−3634 to 6284], P value = .599). The intervention dominated usual care from the payer perspective, whereas the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was €331 000/QALY from a societal perspective. The probability of cost-effectiveness was 72% and 79% from the public payer and 33% and 35% from a societal perspective at the willingness-to-pay thresholds threshold of €40 000 and €80 000/QALY gained.

Conclusions

CMS was likely cost-effective from the payer but not from a societal perspective, underlining the importance of informal care. The gain in QALY was marginal and could be due to the short observation period. Focusing on both the caregiver and the PwD, rather than assessing the PwD needs through the caregiver, could improve the cost-effectiveness results.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Value in Health
Value in Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
3064
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Value in Health contains original research articles for pharmacoeconomics, health economics, and outcomes research (clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes/preference-based research), as well as conceptual and health policy articles that provide valuable information for health care decision-makers as well as the research community. As the official journal of ISPOR, Value in Health provides a forum for researchers, as well as health care decision-makers to translate outcomes research into health care decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信