Guiding medical trainees' workplace learning for interprofessional collaboration-Looking to physicians or seeing nurses?

IF 4.9 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Renée E Stalmeijer, Willem S de Grave, Frank W J M Smeenk, Lara Varpio
{"title":"Guiding medical trainees' workplace learning for interprofessional collaboration-Looking to physicians or seeing nurses?","authors":"Renée E Stalmeijer, Willem S de Grave, Frank W J M Smeenk, Lara Varpio","doi":"10.1111/medu.15617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Effective healthcare practice requires interprofessional collaboration (IPC) between all members of the healthcare team. Preparing healthcare trainees for IPC has proven to be difficult. Research suggests that workplace learning has a vital role in acquiring IPC competencies. However, guidance is required for trainees to make optimal use of IPC workplace learning opportunities. This study asks (1) To what extent is guidance provided to medical trainees when learning to collaborate interprofessionally?; and (2) Who provides this guidance and how?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a constructivist, qualitative study using iterative cycles of semi-structured interviews and reflexive thematic analysis. A purposive sample of medical trainees (N = 11), nurses (N = 9), advance practice clinicians (APCs)(N = 3) and attending physicians (N = 9) associated with a department of general internal medicine in a non-academic teaching hospital participated in this study. Data-analysis was informed by Billett's concept of guidance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Guidance on IPC was provided to medical trainees both intraprofessionally and interprofessionaly, be it limited, informal and implicit. Nurses and APCs provided more guidance on IPC than attending physicians. Guidance by attending physicians included implicit modelling and only became explicit in response to concerns raised about trainees' IPC by nurses. Nurses and APCs provided continuous guidance on various aspects of IPC but felt hampered by hierarchical issues to provide feedback. Trainees were more focused on feedback provided by attending physicians than they were aware of nurses' feedback.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The potential of workplace learning to learn IPC competencies is currently hampered by a lack of explicit guidance. Optimizing the role of workplace learning in IPC competence development requires more explicit role modelling and collaborative intentionality by attending physicians, more critical reflection by trainees and a strengthening of the feedback role of nurses and APCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":18370,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.15617","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Effective healthcare practice requires interprofessional collaboration (IPC) between all members of the healthcare team. Preparing healthcare trainees for IPC has proven to be difficult. Research suggests that workplace learning has a vital role in acquiring IPC competencies. However, guidance is required for trainees to make optimal use of IPC workplace learning opportunities. This study asks (1) To what extent is guidance provided to medical trainees when learning to collaborate interprofessionally?; and (2) Who provides this guidance and how?

Methods: We conducted a constructivist, qualitative study using iterative cycles of semi-structured interviews and reflexive thematic analysis. A purposive sample of medical trainees (N = 11), nurses (N = 9), advance practice clinicians (APCs)(N = 3) and attending physicians (N = 9) associated with a department of general internal medicine in a non-academic teaching hospital participated in this study. Data-analysis was informed by Billett's concept of guidance.

Results: Guidance on IPC was provided to medical trainees both intraprofessionally and interprofessionaly, be it limited, informal and implicit. Nurses and APCs provided more guidance on IPC than attending physicians. Guidance by attending physicians included implicit modelling and only became explicit in response to concerns raised about trainees' IPC by nurses. Nurses and APCs provided continuous guidance on various aspects of IPC but felt hampered by hierarchical issues to provide feedback. Trainees were more focused on feedback provided by attending physicians than they were aware of nurses' feedback.

Conclusion: The potential of workplace learning to learn IPC competencies is currently hampered by a lack of explicit guidance. Optimizing the role of workplace learning in IPC competence development requires more explicit role modelling and collaborative intentionality by attending physicians, more critical reflection by trainees and a strengthening of the feedback role of nurses and APCs.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Education
Medical Education 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
279
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education seeks to be the pre-eminent journal in the field of education for health care professionals, and publishes material of the highest quality, reflecting world wide or provocative issues and perspectives. The journal welcomes high quality papers on all aspects of health professional education including; -undergraduate education -postgraduate training -continuing professional development -interprofessional education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信