Guiding medical trainees' workplace learning for interprofessional collaboration—Looking to physicians or seeing nurses?

IF 5.2 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Renée E. Stalmeijer, Willem S. de Grave, Frank W. J. M. Smeenk, Lara Varpio
{"title":"Guiding medical trainees' workplace learning for interprofessional collaboration—Looking to physicians or seeing nurses?","authors":"Renée E. Stalmeijer,&nbsp;Willem S. de Grave,&nbsp;Frank W. J. M. Smeenk,&nbsp;Lara Varpio","doi":"10.1111/medu.15617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Effective healthcare practice requires interprofessional collaboration (IPC) between all members of the healthcare team. Preparing healthcare trainees for IPC has proven to be difficult. Research suggests that workplace learning has a vital role in acquiring IPC competencies. However, guidance is required for trainees to make optimal use of IPC workplace learning opportunities. This study asks (1) To what extent is guidance provided to medical trainees when learning to collaborate interprofessionally?; and (2) Who provides this guidance and how?</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a constructivist, qualitative study using iterative cycles of semi-structured interviews and reflexive thematic analysis. A purposive sample of medical trainees (N = 11), nurses (N = 9), advance practice clinicians (APCs)(N = 3) and attending physicians (N = 9) associated with a department of general internal medicine in a non-academic teaching hospital participated in this study. Data-analysis was informed by Billett's concept of guidance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Guidance on IPC was provided to medical trainees both <i>intra</i>professionally and <i>inter</i>professionaly, be it limited, informal and implicit. Nurses and APCs provided more guidance on IPC than attending physicians. Guidance by attending physicians included implicit modelling and only became explicit in response to concerns raised about trainees' IPC by nurses. Nurses and APCs provided continuous guidance on various aspects of IPC but felt hampered by hierarchical issues to provide feedback. Trainees were more focused on feedback provided by attending physicians than they were aware of nurses' feedback.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The potential of workplace learning to learn IPC competencies is currently hampered by a lack of explicit guidance. Optimizing the role of workplace learning in IPC competence development requires more explicit role modelling and collaborative intentionality by attending physicians, more critical reflection by trainees and a strengthening of the feedback role of nurses and APCs.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18370,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education","volume":"59 9","pages":"950-959"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://asmepublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/medu.15617","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://asmepublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/medu.15617","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Effective healthcare practice requires interprofessional collaboration (IPC) between all members of the healthcare team. Preparing healthcare trainees for IPC has proven to be difficult. Research suggests that workplace learning has a vital role in acquiring IPC competencies. However, guidance is required for trainees to make optimal use of IPC workplace learning opportunities. This study asks (1) To what extent is guidance provided to medical trainees when learning to collaborate interprofessionally?; and (2) Who provides this guidance and how?

Methods

We conducted a constructivist, qualitative study using iterative cycles of semi-structured interviews and reflexive thematic analysis. A purposive sample of medical trainees (N = 11), nurses (N = 9), advance practice clinicians (APCs)(N = 3) and attending physicians (N = 9) associated with a department of general internal medicine in a non-academic teaching hospital participated in this study. Data-analysis was informed by Billett's concept of guidance.

Results

Guidance on IPC was provided to medical trainees both intraprofessionally and interprofessionaly, be it limited, informal and implicit. Nurses and APCs provided more guidance on IPC than attending physicians. Guidance by attending physicians included implicit modelling and only became explicit in response to concerns raised about trainees' IPC by nurses. Nurses and APCs provided continuous guidance on various aspects of IPC but felt hampered by hierarchical issues to provide feedback. Trainees were more focused on feedback provided by attending physicians than they were aware of nurses' feedback.

Conclusion

The potential of workplace learning to learn IPC competencies is currently hampered by a lack of explicit guidance. Optimizing the role of workplace learning in IPC competence development requires more explicit role modelling and collaborative intentionality by attending physicians, more critical reflection by trainees and a strengthening of the feedback role of nurses and APCs.

指导医学实习生职场学习跨专业合作——看医生还是看护士?
简介:有效的医疗实践需要医疗团队所有成员之间的跨专业协作(IPC)。事实证明,为IPC培训卫生保健学员做好准备是很困难的。研究表明,工作场所学习对于获得IPC能力至关重要。然而,需要指导受训者充分利用IPC工作场所的学习机会。本研究的问题是:(1)在学习跨专业合作时,对医学实习生的指导程度如何?(2)谁提供这种指导,如何提供?方法:采用半结构化访谈和反身性主题分析的迭代循环进行建构主义定性研究。本研究目的样本为某非学术性教学医院普通内科实习医师(N = 11)、护士(N = 9)、高级临床医师(APCs)(N = 3)和主治医师(N = 9)。数据分析受到Billett的指导概念的启发。结果:对医学培训生进行了专业内和专业间的IPC指导,包括有限的、非正式的和隐含的指导。护士和apc比主治医生提供了更多的IPC指导。主治医生的指导包括隐性建模,只有在护士提出对学员IPC的关注后才变得明确。护士和apc在IPC的各个方面提供了持续的指导,但由于等级问题而无法提供反馈。受训人员更关注主治医生提供的反馈,而不是护士的反馈。结论:目前,由于缺乏明确的指导,工作场所学习IPC能力的潜力受到阻碍。优化工作场所学习在IPC能力发展中的作用需要主治医生更明确的角色建模和合作意向,受训人员进行更批判性的反思,并加强护士和apc的反馈作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Education
Medical Education 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
279
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education seeks to be the pre-eminent journal in the field of education for health care professionals, and publishes material of the highest quality, reflecting world wide or provocative issues and perspectives. The journal welcomes high quality papers on all aspects of health professional education including; -undergraduate education -postgraduate training -continuing professional development -interprofessional education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信