“It's most likely gonna be the future”: A qualitative study exploring child and parent perceptions of alternative proteins

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Nandini Anant , Arunika Pillay , Siti Amelia Juraimi , Florence Sheen , Anna Fogel , Mary F-F. Chong , Benjamin P.C. Smith , Aimee E. Pink
{"title":"“It's most likely gonna be the future”: A qualitative study exploring child and parent perceptions of alternative proteins","authors":"Nandini Anant ,&nbsp;Arunika Pillay ,&nbsp;Siti Amelia Juraimi ,&nbsp;Florence Sheen ,&nbsp;Anna Fogel ,&nbsp;Mary F-F. Chong ,&nbsp;Benjamin P.C. Smith ,&nbsp;Aimee E. Pink","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.107898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Alternative proteins offer promise as a sustainable substitute for traditional meat, but consumer acceptance remains low. Understanding the perceptions and preferences of diverse consumers is critical to shifting consumption patterns globally. Moreover, as children are future consumers, exploring their perceptions of alternative proteins along with parental influences is important for driving change. We conducted semi-structured focus groups with child (9–15 years-old) and parent (38–56 years-old) pairs (<em>n=</em>19) in Singapore to explore (i) current awareness and perceptions of plant-based meat, cultivated meat, and insect proteins, and (ii) facilitators and barriers to consumption. Inductive (reflexive thematic analysis) and deductive approaches (using the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation model of Behaviour; COM-B) were adopted for data analysis. Overall, we found greater awareness and acceptance of plant-based meat than cultivated meat and insect proteins. Most children presented with a general curiosity to all alternative proteins, wanting to especially understand the likeness of plant-based and cultivated meat to traditional meat. Parents acknowledged that alternative proteins provided an opportunity to add variety to their diet but were concerned with the naturalness of alternative proteins and the novel technologies used to manufacture them. Insect proteins faced fear and disgust, although the historical consumption of insects meant children and parents deemed these as safe. Taste, cost and the impact on health were also commonly discussed by both children and parents. Our findings highlight key factors that influence children and parents’ acceptance and consumption of alternative proteins, which can inform the development of targeted interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":"207 ","pages":"Article 107898"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666325000509","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Alternative proteins offer promise as a sustainable substitute for traditional meat, but consumer acceptance remains low. Understanding the perceptions and preferences of diverse consumers is critical to shifting consumption patterns globally. Moreover, as children are future consumers, exploring their perceptions of alternative proteins along with parental influences is important for driving change. We conducted semi-structured focus groups with child (9–15 years-old) and parent (38–56 years-old) pairs (n=19) in Singapore to explore (i) current awareness and perceptions of plant-based meat, cultivated meat, and insect proteins, and (ii) facilitators and barriers to consumption. Inductive (reflexive thematic analysis) and deductive approaches (using the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation model of Behaviour; COM-B) were adopted for data analysis. Overall, we found greater awareness and acceptance of plant-based meat than cultivated meat and insect proteins. Most children presented with a general curiosity to all alternative proteins, wanting to especially understand the likeness of plant-based and cultivated meat to traditional meat. Parents acknowledged that alternative proteins provided an opportunity to add variety to their diet but were concerned with the naturalness of alternative proteins and the novel technologies used to manufacture them. Insect proteins faced fear and disgust, although the historical consumption of insects meant children and parents deemed these as safe. Taste, cost and the impact on health were also commonly discussed by both children and parents. Our findings highlight key factors that influence children and parents’ acceptance and consumption of alternative proteins, which can inform the development of targeted interventions.

Abstract Image

“这很可能是未来”:一项探索儿童和父母对替代蛋白质看法的定性研究。
替代蛋白质有望成为传统肉类的可持续替代品,但消费者的接受程度仍然很低。了解不同消费者的观念和偏好对于改变全球消费模式至关重要。此外,由于儿童是未来的消费者,探索他们对替代蛋白质的看法以及父母的影响对于推动变革非常重要。我们在新加坡对儿童(9-15岁)和父母(38-56岁)进行了半结构化的焦点小组(n=19),以探讨(i)目前对植物性肉类、人工养殖肉类和昆虫蛋白的认识和看法,以及(ii)消费的促进因素和障碍。归纳(反思性主题分析)和演绎方法(使用行为的能力、机会和动机模型;采用COM-B)进行数据分析。总的来说,我们发现人们对植物性肉类的认识和接受程度高于养殖肉类和昆虫蛋白。大多数孩子对所有替代蛋白质都表现出普遍的好奇心,尤其想了解植物性和人工培育的肉类与传统肉类的相似之处。家长们承认,替代蛋白质为他们的饮食提供了一个增加多样性的机会,但他们关心的是替代蛋白质的天然性和用于制造它们的新技术。昆虫蛋白质面临恐惧和厌恶,尽管历史上食用昆虫意味着儿童和父母认为昆虫蛋白质是安全的。口味、成本和对健康的影响也是孩子和父母经常讨论的话题。我们的研究结果强调了影响儿童和家长接受和食用替代蛋白质的关键因素,这可以为有针对性的干预措施的发展提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Appetite
Appetite 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
566
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信