"It's most likely gonna be the future": A Qualitative Study Exploring Child and Parent Perceptions of Alternative Proteins.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Nandini Anant, Arunika Pillay, Siti Amelia Juraimi, Florence Sheen, Anna Fogel, Mary F-F Chong, Benjamin P C Smith, Aimee E Pink
{"title":"\"It's most likely gonna be the future\": A Qualitative Study Exploring Child and Parent Perceptions of Alternative Proteins.","authors":"Nandini Anant, Arunika Pillay, Siti Amelia Juraimi, Florence Sheen, Anna Fogel, Mary F-F Chong, Benjamin P C Smith, Aimee E Pink","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.107898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Alternative proteins offer promise as a sustainable substitute for traditional meat, but consumer acceptance remains low. Understanding the perceptions and preferences of diverse consumers is critical to shifting consumption patterns globally. Moreover, as children are future consumers, exploring their perceptions of alternative proteins along with parental influences is important for driving change. We conducted semi-structured focus groups with child (9-15 years-old) and parent (38-56 years-old) pairs (n=19) in Singapore to explore (i) current awareness and perceptions of plant-based meat, cultivated meat, and insect proteins, and (ii) facilitators and barriers to consumption. Inductive (reflexive thematic analysis) and deductive approaches (using the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation model of Behaviour; COM-B) were adopted for data analysis. Overall, we found greater awareness and acceptance of plant-based meat than cultivated meat and insect proteins. Most children presented with a general curiosity to all alternative proteins, wanting to especially understand the likeness of plant-based and cultivated meat to traditional meat. Parents acknowledged that alternative proteins provided an opportunity to add variety to their diet but were concerned with the naturalness of alternative proteins and the novel technologies used to manufacture them. Insect proteins faced fear and disgust, although the historical consumption of insects meant children and parents deemed these as safe. Taste, cost and the impact on health were also commonly discussed by both children and parents. Our findings highlight key factors that influence children and parents' acceptance and consumption of alternative proteins, which can inform the development of targeted interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":" ","pages":"107898"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2025.107898","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Alternative proteins offer promise as a sustainable substitute for traditional meat, but consumer acceptance remains low. Understanding the perceptions and preferences of diverse consumers is critical to shifting consumption patterns globally. Moreover, as children are future consumers, exploring their perceptions of alternative proteins along with parental influences is important for driving change. We conducted semi-structured focus groups with child (9-15 years-old) and parent (38-56 years-old) pairs (n=19) in Singapore to explore (i) current awareness and perceptions of plant-based meat, cultivated meat, and insect proteins, and (ii) facilitators and barriers to consumption. Inductive (reflexive thematic analysis) and deductive approaches (using the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation model of Behaviour; COM-B) were adopted for data analysis. Overall, we found greater awareness and acceptance of plant-based meat than cultivated meat and insect proteins. Most children presented with a general curiosity to all alternative proteins, wanting to especially understand the likeness of plant-based and cultivated meat to traditional meat. Parents acknowledged that alternative proteins provided an opportunity to add variety to their diet but were concerned with the naturalness of alternative proteins and the novel technologies used to manufacture them. Insect proteins faced fear and disgust, although the historical consumption of insects meant children and parents deemed these as safe. Taste, cost and the impact on health were also commonly discussed by both children and parents. Our findings highlight key factors that influence children and parents' acceptance and consumption of alternative proteins, which can inform the development of targeted interventions.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Appetite
Appetite 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
566
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信