Professional Experience Modulates the Effect of Impulsiveness on Laparoscopic Simulator Performance

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Bas Kengen MD, PhD, Harry van Goor MD, PhD, Jan-Maarten Luursema PhD
{"title":"Professional Experience Modulates the Effect of Impulsiveness on Laparoscopic Simulator Performance","authors":"Bas Kengen MD, PhD,&nbsp;Harry van Goor MD, PhD,&nbsp;Jan-Maarten Luursema PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>High impulsiveness is associated with adverse outcomes, such as dangerous driving leading to traffic accidents and decreased job performance in general. In surgical training, high impulsiveness is associated with increased damage during simulated laparoscopic tasks. The objective of this study is to investigate the impact of professional experience on the relation between impulsiveness and simulated laparoscopy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this single institution study, a total of 120 participants, of whom 78 inexperienced medical students and residents (≤ 10 laparoscopic procedures as primary surgeon), and 42 residents and attending surgeons experienced in laparoscopy (&gt; 10 laparoscopic procedures as primary surgeon), performed 4 different, standardized laparoscopic tasks on the LapSim Virtual Reality trainer. Based on the UPPSP impulsive behavior scale, a scale to measure impulsiveness, we divided participants into equal sized high- and low impulsiveness groups for both experience groups. We used Mann–Whitney U tests to compare task duration and damage parameters between the low and high impulsiveness group, separately for inexperienced and experienced participants. Spearman's rank correlation tests were used to investigate the correlation of different facets of impulsiveness (positive and negative urgency, premeditation, perseverance and sensation seeking) on performance.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Inexperienced participants with high impulsiveness demonstrated significantly faster task completion (<em>z</em> = 2.74, p &lt; 0.01). Inexperienced participants of very high-impulsiveness (upper quartile) also caused significantly more tissue damage (<em>z</em> = 2.27, p = 0.02). Conversely, experienced surgeons exhibited no discernible performance variations based on impulsiveness for time (<em>z</em> = 1.42, p = 0.16) or tissue damage (<em>z</em> = −0.19, p = 0.85). For inexperienced participants the impulsiveness facets (lack of) premeditation and sensation seeking correlated with shorter task duration, while negative urgency, positive urgency, and (lack of) perseverance were associated with increased tissue damage. For the experienced participants no significant correlations were found between impulsiveness facets and simulator outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>High impulsiveness results in shorter task duration but tend to increase tissue damage for laparoscopic simulator performance of inexperienced trainees. The performance of experienced surgeons remained unaffected by impulsiveness, indicating that professional experience may play a role in mitigating its influence.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Education","volume":"82 4","pages":"Article 103443"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720425000248","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

High impulsiveness is associated with adverse outcomes, such as dangerous driving leading to traffic accidents and decreased job performance in general. In surgical training, high impulsiveness is associated with increased damage during simulated laparoscopic tasks. The objective of this study is to investigate the impact of professional experience on the relation between impulsiveness and simulated laparoscopy.

Methods

In this single institution study, a total of 120 participants, of whom 78 inexperienced medical students and residents (≤ 10 laparoscopic procedures as primary surgeon), and 42 residents and attending surgeons experienced in laparoscopy (> 10 laparoscopic procedures as primary surgeon), performed 4 different, standardized laparoscopic tasks on the LapSim Virtual Reality trainer. Based on the UPPSP impulsive behavior scale, a scale to measure impulsiveness, we divided participants into equal sized high- and low impulsiveness groups for both experience groups. We used Mann–Whitney U tests to compare task duration and damage parameters between the low and high impulsiveness group, separately for inexperienced and experienced participants. Spearman's rank correlation tests were used to investigate the correlation of different facets of impulsiveness (positive and negative urgency, premeditation, perseverance and sensation seeking) on performance.

Results

Inexperienced participants with high impulsiveness demonstrated significantly faster task completion (z = 2.74, p < 0.01). Inexperienced participants of very high-impulsiveness (upper quartile) also caused significantly more tissue damage (z = 2.27, p = 0.02). Conversely, experienced surgeons exhibited no discernible performance variations based on impulsiveness for time (z = 1.42, p = 0.16) or tissue damage (z = −0.19, p = 0.85). For inexperienced participants the impulsiveness facets (lack of) premeditation and sensation seeking correlated with shorter task duration, while negative urgency, positive urgency, and (lack of) perseverance were associated with increased tissue damage. For the experienced participants no significant correlations were found between impulsiveness facets and simulator outcomes.

Conclusion

High impulsiveness results in shorter task duration but tend to increase tissue damage for laparoscopic simulator performance of inexperienced trainees. The performance of experienced surgeons remained unaffected by impulsiveness, indicating that professional experience may play a role in mitigating its influence.
专业经验调节冲动对腹腔镜模拟器性能的影响
高冲动与不良后果有关,如危险驾驶导致交通事故和总体工作绩效下降。在外科训练中,高冲动与模拟腹腔镜任务中增加的损伤有关。本研究的目的是探讨专业经验对冲动与模拟腹腔镜之间的关系的影响。方法在这项单机构研究中,共有120名参与者,其中78名没有经验的医学生和住院医师(作为主要外科医生≤10次腹腔镜手术),42名有腹腔镜经验的住院医师和主治外科医生(>;在LapSim虚拟现实训练器上完成了4项不同的标准化腹腔镜任务。基于UPPSP冲动行为量表(一种衡量冲动的量表),我们将两个体验组的参与者分为大小相等的高冲动组和低冲动组。我们使用Mann-Whitney U测试来比较低冲动组和高冲动组的任务持续时间和损伤参数,分别针对经验不足和经验丰富的参与者。采用Spearman等级相关检验研究冲动性不同方面(积极和消极紧迫感、预谋、毅力和感觉寻求)与绩效的相关性。结果经验丰富的高冲动性被试完成任务的速度显著高于经验丰富的高冲动性被试(z = 2.74,p <;0.01)。缺乏经验的高冲动参与者(上四分位数)也造成了更多的组织损伤(z = 2.27,p = 0.02)。相反,经验丰富的外科医生没有表现出基于时间冲动(z = 1.42,p = 0.16)或组织损伤(z = - 0.19,p = 0.85)的明显表现变化。对于没有经验的参与者,冲动方面(缺乏)预谋和感觉寻求与较短的任务持续时间相关,而消极紧迫性,积极紧迫性和(缺乏)毅力与增加的组织损伤相关。对于经验丰富的参与者,冲动方面与模拟结果之间没有显著的相关性。结论高冲动性会缩短任务时间,但易增加组织损伤。经验丰富的外科医生的表现不受冲动的影响,表明专业经验可能在减轻其影响方面发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Surgical Education
Journal of Surgical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-SURGERY
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
261
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Education (JSE) is dedicated to advancing the field of surgical education through original research. The journal publishes research articles in all surgical disciplines on topics relative to the education of surgical students, residents, and fellows, as well as practicing surgeons. Our readers look to JSE for timely, innovative research findings from the international surgical education community. As the official journal of the Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS), JSE publishes the proceedings of the annual APDS meeting held during Surgery Education Week.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信