“Being With” as the Center and Circumference of Teaching

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
David T. Hansen
{"title":"“Being With” as the Center and Circumference of Teaching","authors":"David T. Hansen","doi":"10.1111/edth.12673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this article, David Hansen works with two conceptions of “being with.” The first is Jean-Luc Nancy's ontological version as found in his <i>Being Singular Plural</i> (1999). The second is Hansen's ontic formulation as expressed in his recent book, <i>Reimagining the Call to Teach: A Witness to Teachers and Teaching</i> (2021). Nancy's notion is ethical as well as ontological. It constitutes a vision of human being <i>qua</i> being and is formulated in critical juxtaposition with the viewpoints on ethics and being of Martin Heidegger and other recent thinkers. Hansen's conception is not ontological, as such, but is ethical in the sense of presuming that teaching is a practice with built-in terms of relationship between teachers, students, and the subject matter of education, where “education” differs from socialization and enculturation. “Being with” constitutes a term of art for the priority in teaching of attunement, responsiveness, and receptivity — both to students and to subject matter — over formal processes of teacher reflection. The latter are indispensable, but they take their identity and their warrant from the fundamental ethical terms of the practice that are rooted in being with. Here, Hansen seeks to show how Nancy's conception of being with enriches the pedagogical idea of being with as the center and circumference of teaching.</p>","PeriodicalId":47134,"journal":{"name":"EDUCATIONAL THEORY","volume":"74 6","pages":"942-962"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EDUCATIONAL THEORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/edth.12673","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, David Hansen works with two conceptions of “being with.” The first is Jean-Luc Nancy's ontological version as found in his Being Singular Plural (1999). The second is Hansen's ontic formulation as expressed in his recent book, Reimagining the Call to Teach: A Witness to Teachers and Teaching (2021). Nancy's notion is ethical as well as ontological. It constitutes a vision of human being qua being and is formulated in critical juxtaposition with the viewpoints on ethics and being of Martin Heidegger and other recent thinkers. Hansen's conception is not ontological, as such, but is ethical in the sense of presuming that teaching is a practice with built-in terms of relationship between teachers, students, and the subject matter of education, where “education” differs from socialization and enculturation. “Being with” constitutes a term of art for the priority in teaching of attunement, responsiveness, and receptivity — both to students and to subject matter — over formal processes of teacher reflection. The latter are indispensable, but they take their identity and their warrant from the fundamental ethical terms of the practice that are rooted in being with. Here, Hansen seeks to show how Nancy's conception of being with enriches the pedagogical idea of being with as the center and circumference of teaching.

“与”是教学的中心和圆周
在这篇文章中,David Hansen使用了“与”的两个概念。首先是jean - luc南希的本体论版本中发现他是单数复数(1999)。第二个是汉森在他的新书《重新想象教学的呼唤:教师和教学的见证》(2021)中表达的本体公式。南希的概念既是伦理的也是本体论的。它构成了人类作为存在的愿景,并与马丁·海德格尔和其他近代思想家的伦理学和存在观进行了批判性并置。汉森的概念本身不是本体论的,而是伦理的,因为他假设教学是一种实践,在教师、学生和教育对象之间有着内在的关系,其中“教育”不同于社会化和文化化。“与”构成了一个艺术术语,在教学中,对学生和主题的协调、反应和接受性优先于教师反思的正式过程。后者是不可或缺的,但它们的身份和保证来自于根植于“与”的实践的基本伦理条件。在这里,汉森试图展示南希的“与”概念如何丰富了“与”作为教学中心和圆周的教学理念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EDUCATIONAL THEORY
EDUCATIONAL THEORY EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: The general purposes of Educational Theory are to foster the continuing development of educational theory and to encourage wide and effective discussion of theoretical problems within the educational profession. In order to achieve these purposes, the journal is devoted to publishing scholarly articles and studies in the foundations of education, and in related disciplines outside the field of education, which contribute to the advancement of educational theory. It is the policy of the sponsoring organizations to maintain the journal as an open channel of communication and as an open forum for discussion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信