{"title":"Benjamin on Occultism and Progressive Education: A Warning Concerning “Liberal” Fascism","authors":"Tyson E. Lewis","doi":"10.1111/edth.12671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>For the first time, Walter Benjamin's critical comments on educator and philosopher Rudolf Steiner are examined in depth. In particular, Benjamin detected protofascist themes within Steiner's seemingly progressive notion of child-centered, arts-based, developmentally appropriate early childhood education. But this does not mean that Benjamin completely rejected Steiner's work as mere ideology. Instead, we can find the subtle trace of Steiner's influence in Benjamin's own reflections on childhood. Here Tyson E. Lewis calls for a dialectical approach modeled by Benjamin that allows us to critically interrogate Steiner's progressive education for protofascist tendencies, while also redeeming various insights into the lives of children. This dialectical approach to understanding the complex relationship between progressive education and fascism is now more urgent than ever before.</p>","PeriodicalId":47134,"journal":{"name":"EDUCATIONAL THEORY","volume":"74 6","pages":"822-839"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EDUCATIONAL THEORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/edth.12671","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
For the first time, Walter Benjamin's critical comments on educator and philosopher Rudolf Steiner are examined in depth. In particular, Benjamin detected protofascist themes within Steiner's seemingly progressive notion of child-centered, arts-based, developmentally appropriate early childhood education. But this does not mean that Benjamin completely rejected Steiner's work as mere ideology. Instead, we can find the subtle trace of Steiner's influence in Benjamin's own reflections on childhood. Here Tyson E. Lewis calls for a dialectical approach modeled by Benjamin that allows us to critically interrogate Steiner's progressive education for protofascist tendencies, while also redeeming various insights into the lives of children. This dialectical approach to understanding the complex relationship between progressive education and fascism is now more urgent than ever before.
瓦尔特·本雅明对教育家和哲学家鲁道夫·施泰纳的批评第一次被深入研究。特别是,本雅明在斯坦纳看似进步的以儿童为中心、以艺术为基础、适合发展的早期儿童教育理念中发现了原始法西斯主义的主题。但这并不意味着本雅明完全将斯坦纳的著作视为纯粹的意识形态。相反,我们可以在本雅明自己对童年的反思中找到施泰纳影响的微妙痕迹。在这里,泰森·e·刘易斯(Tyson E. Lewis)呼吁采用本雅明(Benjamin)为模型的辩证方法,使我们能够批判性地质疑斯坦纳(Steiner)的进步教育的原始法西斯倾向,同时也挽救了对儿童生活的各种见解。这种辩证的方法来理解进步教育和法西斯主义之间的复杂关系,现在比以往任何时候都更加迫切。
期刊介绍:
The general purposes of Educational Theory are to foster the continuing development of educational theory and to encourage wide and effective discussion of theoretical problems within the educational profession. In order to achieve these purposes, the journal is devoted to publishing scholarly articles and studies in the foundations of education, and in related disciplines outside the field of education, which contribute to the advancement of educational theory. It is the policy of the sponsoring organizations to maintain the journal as an open channel of communication and as an open forum for discussion.