Reproducing and reformulating categories of skill in regional and global migration governance: evidence from India and Bangladesh.

IF 2.1 2区 社会学 Q1 ETHNIC STUDIES
Ethnic and Racial Studies Pub Date : 2024-10-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/01419870.2024.2404485
Mira Burmeister-Rudolph
{"title":"Reproducing and reformulating categories of skill in regional and global migration governance: evidence from India and Bangladesh.","authors":"Mira Burmeister-Rudolph","doi":"10.1080/01419870.2024.2404485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Approximately one-third of the world's 169 million migrant workers come from the Asia and Pacific region, primarily working in temporary, low-wage jobs in the Gulf, where they face human and labor rights issues. In 2003, 12 Asian migrant-origin states formed the Colombo Process to address these labor concerns. This article examines and contrasts two major emigrant-origin states' - India and Bangladesh -behavior in the Colombo Process, a regional consultative process, and other multilateral migration governance fora, focusing on the social construction of skills. Both countries inherited a colonial legal system of emigration regulation which distinguished emigrants into \"high-\" and \"low-skill\" categories, which India continues to reproduce, while Bangladesh aims to reformulate their categorization. This article investigates the how, where, and when of the countries' emigrant categorization processes by tracing the categories' origins, their reproduction, and reformulation. This article highlights the significant role migrant-origin states play in the politics of skill.</p>","PeriodicalId":48345,"journal":{"name":"Ethnic and Racial Studies","volume":"48 4","pages":"763-788"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11789704/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnic and Racial Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2024.2404485","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Approximately one-third of the world's 169 million migrant workers come from the Asia and Pacific region, primarily working in temporary, low-wage jobs in the Gulf, where they face human and labor rights issues. In 2003, 12 Asian migrant-origin states formed the Colombo Process to address these labor concerns. This article examines and contrasts two major emigrant-origin states' - India and Bangladesh -behavior in the Colombo Process, a regional consultative process, and other multilateral migration governance fora, focusing on the social construction of skills. Both countries inherited a colonial legal system of emigration regulation which distinguished emigrants into "high-" and "low-skill" categories, which India continues to reproduce, while Bangladesh aims to reformulate their categorization. This article investigates the how, where, and when of the countries' emigrant categorization processes by tracing the categories' origins, their reproduction, and reformulation. This article highlights the significant role migrant-origin states play in the politics of skill.

在区域和全球移民治理中再现和重新制定技能类别:来自印度和孟加拉国的证据。
全球1.69亿移徙工人中约有三分之一来自亚太地区,他们主要在海湾地区从事低工资的临时工作,在那里他们面临着人权和劳工权利问题。2003年,12个亚洲移民来源国成立了科伦坡进程,以解决这些劳工问题。本文考察并对比了两个主要移民来源国——印度和孟加拉国——在科伦坡进程(一个区域协商进程)和其他多边移民治理论坛中的行为,重点关注技能的社会建设。这两个国家都继承了殖民时期的移民管理法律制度,将移民分为“高”技能和“低”技能两类,印度继续复制这一制度,而孟加拉国则打算重新制定他们的分类。本文通过追踪类别的起源、复制和重新制定,调查了各国移民分类过程的方式、地点和时间。本文强调了移民来源国在技能政治中发挥的重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
8.00%
发文量
258
期刊介绍: Race, ethnicity and nationalism are at the heart of many of the major social and political issues in the present global environment. New antagonisms have emerged which require a rethinking of traditional theoretical and empirical perspectives. Ethnic and Racial Studies, published ten times a year, is the leading journal for the analysis of these issues throughout the world. The journal provides an interdisciplinary academic forum for the presentation of research and theoretical analysis, drawing on sociology, social policy, anthropology, political science, economics, geography, international relations, history, social psychology and cultural studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信