Effects of Kilohertz Frequency on Paresthesia Perception Thresholds in Spinal Cord Stimulation.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain physician Pub Date : 2025-01-01
Kas Amirdelfan, David Provenzano, Cong Yu, Paul Verrills, Ricardo Vallejo, Maged Guirguis, Jordan Tate, Kerry Bradley
{"title":"Effects of Kilohertz Frequency on Paresthesia Perception Thresholds in Spinal Cord Stimulation.","authors":"Kas Amirdelfan, David Provenzano, Cong Yu, Paul Verrills, Ricardo Vallejo, Maged Guirguis, Jordan Tate, Kerry Bradley","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Paresthesia-based spinal cord stimulation (SCS) depends upon dorsal column (DC) fiber activation to engage pain-relieving neural mechanisms. However, the mechanisms for 10-kHz paresthesia-free SCS have not been fully elucidated. Preclinical work has shown selective drive of inhibitory dorsal horn neurons, while other hypotheses suggest that DC fibers may be activated. To provide clinical data for guiding mechanism work, we analyzed paresthesia perception thresholds (PPT) over a range of low to high kHz frequency and compared those values to the stimulation parameters from the therapeutic 10-kHz SCS programs used by patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The goal of this study was to provide clinically relevant stimulation parameters for translational mechanism work.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective chart review of technical data collected during baseline evaluation from two prospective clinical studies.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Acute outpatient follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were extracted from study files of enrolled patients who had used fully implanted SCS for at least 3 months with leads positioned in the epidural space at the T8-T11 vertebral levels to treat their chronic intractable back and/or leg pain. PPTs had been measured using a bipole program at 10 kHz at pulse width (PW) = 30 µs, and at 50 Hz, 500 Hz, 1 kHz, and 5 kHz at PW = 80 µs. Therapeutic stimulation amplitudes for 10 kHz at 30 µs were obtained from patients' IPG log files at the time of study enrollment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PPTs were obtained from 23 patients with failed back surgery syndrome (11 M/ 12 F; 60 ± 15 years old). PPTs at PW = 80 µs were PPT (50 Hz) = 7.9 (5.7 - 9.7) mA, PPT (500 Hz) = 7.0 (5.2 - 9.1) mA, PPT(1 kHz) = 7.0 (5.5 --8.5) mA, and PPT (5 kHz) = 6.1 (4.1- 7.9) mA; all higher frequencies had statistically significantly lower PPTs than PPT(50 Hz at 80 µs). For 10 kHz at 30 µs, the PPT was higher than 15 mA for 13 (56%) of the subjects; for the remaining 44%, the PPT =  8.3  ± 4.0 mA was statistically significantly larger than the therapeutic stimulation pulse amplitudes = 2.4 ± 0.4 mA.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Retrospective chart review, small number of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Therapeutic 10-kHz SCS uses stimulation amplitudes far lower than the PPT, providing evidence that therapeutic 10-kHz SCS does not activate dorsal column axons.  Additionally, the PPT decreases with increasing kHz frequency, suggesting that a presumed asynchronous pattern of activation from kHz stimulation does not raise the threshold at which sensation occurs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19841,"journal":{"name":"Pain physician","volume":"28 1","pages":"E81-E91"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain physician","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Paresthesia-based spinal cord stimulation (SCS) depends upon dorsal column (DC) fiber activation to engage pain-relieving neural mechanisms. However, the mechanisms for 10-kHz paresthesia-free SCS have not been fully elucidated. Preclinical work has shown selective drive of inhibitory dorsal horn neurons, while other hypotheses suggest that DC fibers may be activated. To provide clinical data for guiding mechanism work, we analyzed paresthesia perception thresholds (PPT) over a range of low to high kHz frequency and compared those values to the stimulation parameters from the therapeutic 10-kHz SCS programs used by patients.

Objective: The goal of this study was to provide clinically relevant stimulation parameters for translational mechanism work.

Study design: Retrospective chart review of technical data collected during baseline evaluation from two prospective clinical studies.

Setting: Acute outpatient follow-up.

Methods: Data were extracted from study files of enrolled patients who had used fully implanted SCS for at least 3 months with leads positioned in the epidural space at the T8-T11 vertebral levels to treat their chronic intractable back and/or leg pain. PPTs had been measured using a bipole program at 10 kHz at pulse width (PW) = 30 µs, and at 50 Hz, 500 Hz, 1 kHz, and 5 kHz at PW = 80 µs. Therapeutic stimulation amplitudes for 10 kHz at 30 µs were obtained from patients' IPG log files at the time of study enrollment.

Results: PPTs were obtained from 23 patients with failed back surgery syndrome (11 M/ 12 F; 60 ± 15 years old). PPTs at PW = 80 µs were PPT (50 Hz) = 7.9 (5.7 - 9.7) mA, PPT (500 Hz) = 7.0 (5.2 - 9.1) mA, PPT(1 kHz) = 7.0 (5.5 --8.5) mA, and PPT (5 kHz) = 6.1 (4.1- 7.9) mA; all higher frequencies had statistically significantly lower PPTs than PPT(50 Hz at 80 µs). For 10 kHz at 30 µs, the PPT was higher than 15 mA for 13 (56%) of the subjects; for the remaining 44%, the PPT =  8.3  ± 4.0 mA was statistically significantly larger than the therapeutic stimulation pulse amplitudes = 2.4 ± 0.4 mA.

Limitations: Retrospective chart review, small number of patients.

Conclusions: Therapeutic 10-kHz SCS uses stimulation amplitudes far lower than the PPT, providing evidence that therapeutic 10-kHz SCS does not activate dorsal column axons.  Additionally, the PPT decreases with increasing kHz frequency, suggesting that a presumed asynchronous pattern of activation from kHz stimulation does not raise the threshold at which sensation occurs.

背景:基于麻痹的脊髓刺激(SCS)依赖于背柱(DC)纤维的激活来调动疼痛缓解神经机制。然而,10 千赫无麻痹脊髓刺激的机制尚未完全阐明。临床前研究表明,抑制性背角神经元会被选择性驱动,而其他假说则认为 DC 纤维可能会被激活。为了提供指导机制工作的临床数据,我们分析了从低到高千赫频率范围内的麻痹感阈值(PPT),并将这些值与患者使用的治疗性 10 千赫 SCS 程序的刺激参数进行了比较:本研究的目的是为转化机制工作提供临床相关的刺激参数:研究设计:对两项前瞻性临床研究基线评估期间收集的技术数据进行回顾性图表审查:急性门诊病人随访:研究数据取自入组患者的研究档案,这些患者已使用完全植入式 SCS 至少 3 个月,导线位于 T8-T11 椎体水平的硬膜外腔,用于治疗慢性顽固性背痛和/或腿痛。使用双极程序测量了脉宽(PW)= 30 µs 时的 10 kHz PPT,以及脉宽(PW)= 80 µs 时的 50 Hz、500 Hz、1 kHz 和 5 kHz PPT。10 kHz、30 µs 的治疗性刺激振幅来自患者注册研究时的 IPG 日志文件:从 23 名背部手术失败综合征患者(11 名男性/12 名女性;60 ± 15 岁)处获得了 PPT。PW = 80 µs 时的 PPT 为 PPT (50 Hz) = 7.9 (5.7 - 9.7) mA,PPT (500 Hz) = 7.0 (5.2 - 9.1) mA,PPT(1 kHz) = 7.0 (5.5 - 8.5) mA,PPT(5 kHz) = 6.1 (4.1- 7.9) mA;所有较高频率的 PPT 均明显低于 PPT(50 Hz, 80 µs) 。在 30 µs 的 10 kHz 频率下,13 名受试者(56%)的 PPT 值高于 15 mA;在其余 44% 的受试者中,PPT = 8.3 ± 4.0 mA 在统计学上明显大于治疗刺激脉冲振幅 = 2.4 ± 0.4 mA:局限性:回顾性病历审查,患者人数较少:结论:治疗性 10 kHz SCS 使用的刺激幅度远低于 PPT,这为治疗性 10 kHz SCS 无法激活背柱轴突提供了证据。 此外,PPT 会随着 kHz 频率的增加而降低,这表明 kHz 刺激所产生的假定非同步激活模式不会提高产生感觉的阈值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain physician
Pain physician CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
21.60%
发文量
234
期刊介绍: Pain Physician Journal is the official publication of the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP). The open access journal is published 6 times a year. Pain Physician Journal is a peer-reviewed, multi-disciplinary, open access journal written by and directed to an audience of interventional pain physicians, clinicians and basic scientists with an interest in interventional pain management and pain medicine. Pain Physician Journal presents the latest studies, research, and information vital to those in the emerging specialty of interventional pain management – and critical to the people they serve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信