Spinal Cord Stimulation Using High Frequency Electromagnetic Coupling (HF-EMC) Technology to Power an Implanted Neurostimulator With a Separate Receiver for Treating Chronic Back and Leg Pain: A Retrospective Study.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain physician Pub Date : 2025-01-01
Raul Rodas
{"title":"Spinal Cord Stimulation Using High Frequency Electromagnetic Coupling (HF-EMC) Technology to Power an Implanted Neurostimulator With a Separate Receiver for Treating Chronic Back and Leg Pain: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Raul Rodas","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic low back and lower limb pain occurs in 13% of Americans, and is the leading cause of disability. Patients with this condition have a reduced quality of life, have mental health disorders, and cognitive disfunction. While back pain alone is difficult to manage, back pain with associated leg pain results in further reduced outcomes. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a minimally invasive therapy that has been used for a variety of chronic pain disorders when conservative management strategies have failed. The therapy is appealing because of its ability to provide long-term relief at a reduced cost and it has low rates of serious adverse events.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this retrospective study was to examine the safety and efficacy of the Freedom® Spinal Cord Stimulator System for treating patients who have chronic bilateral back and leg pain.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This retrospective study included 32 patients who received a permanent Freedom® SCS System to treat their chronic bilateral back and leg pain due to nerve compression due to complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) Type I and/or II. A retrospective chart review was conducted to assess baseline and follow-up Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) pain scores as well as  complications.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This study was conducted at a single center in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data were retrospectively collected from patients' medical records. Pain was assessed using the 11-point VRS scores; these scores were collected at baseline, post-trial, 6 months post-implantation, and 12 months post-implantation. Adverse events were reported descriptively and classified as serious or nonserious and either related or nonrelated to the implantation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The post-trial VRS scores for the 32 patients  were reduced by 73% (P < 0.001). At 6 months post-implantation, the VRS scores were reduced by 71% (P < 0.001) for 30 patients and at 12 months by 74% (P < 0.001) for 19 patients. No adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Our study's retrospective design limited us to the data available in the patients' charts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Freedom SCS System is an effective and safe therapy for treating patients with chronic back and leg pain that is resistant to conservative therapy due to nerve compression and CRPS Type I and/or II. These types of patients often report aggravation of symptoms with surgery. Minimal invasive surgery should decrease the chance of extra symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":19841,"journal":{"name":"Pain physician","volume":"28 1","pages":"E43-E47"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain physician","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic low back and lower limb pain occurs in 13% of Americans, and is the leading cause of disability. Patients with this condition have a reduced quality of life, have mental health disorders, and cognitive disfunction. While back pain alone is difficult to manage, back pain with associated leg pain results in further reduced outcomes. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a minimally invasive therapy that has been used for a variety of chronic pain disorders when conservative management strategies have failed. The therapy is appealing because of its ability to provide long-term relief at a reduced cost and it has low rates of serious adverse events.

Objective: The objective of this retrospective study was to examine the safety and efficacy of the Freedom® Spinal Cord Stimulator System for treating patients who have chronic bilateral back and leg pain.

Study design: This retrospective study included 32 patients who received a permanent Freedom® SCS System to treat their chronic bilateral back and leg pain due to nerve compression due to complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) Type I and/or II. A retrospective chart review was conducted to assess baseline and follow-up Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) pain scores as well as  complications.

Setting: This study was conducted at a single center in the United States.

Methods: The data were retrospectively collected from patients' medical records. Pain was assessed using the 11-point VRS scores; these scores were collected at baseline, post-trial, 6 months post-implantation, and 12 months post-implantation. Adverse events were reported descriptively and classified as serious or nonserious and either related or nonrelated to the implantation.

Results: The post-trial VRS scores for the 32 patients  were reduced by 73% (P < 0.001). At 6 months post-implantation, the VRS scores were reduced by 71% (P < 0.001) for 30 patients and at 12 months by 74% (P < 0.001) for 19 patients. No adverse events were reported.

Limitations: Our study's retrospective design limited us to the data available in the patients' charts.

Conclusion: The Freedom SCS System is an effective and safe therapy for treating patients with chronic back and leg pain that is resistant to conservative therapy due to nerve compression and CRPS Type I and/or II. These types of patients often report aggravation of symptoms with surgery. Minimal invasive surgery should decrease the chance of extra symptoms.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain physician
Pain physician CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
21.60%
发文量
234
期刊介绍: Pain Physician Journal is the official publication of the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP). The open access journal is published 6 times a year. Pain Physician Journal is a peer-reviewed, multi-disciplinary, open access journal written by and directed to an audience of interventional pain physicians, clinicians and basic scientists with an interest in interventional pain management and pain medicine. Pain Physician Journal presents the latest studies, research, and information vital to those in the emerging specialty of interventional pain management – and critical to the people they serve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信