Filling gaps in MODIS NDVI data using hybrid multiple imputation–Machine learning and DINCAE techniques: Case study of the State of Hawaii

IF 4 2区 工程技术 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Trang Thi Kieu Tran , Sayed M. Bateni , Hamid Mohebzadeh , Changhyun Jun , Manish Pandey , Dongkyn Kim
{"title":"Filling gaps in MODIS NDVI data using hybrid multiple imputation–Machine learning and DINCAE techniques: Case study of the State of Hawaii","authors":"Trang Thi Kieu Tran ,&nbsp;Sayed M. Bateni ,&nbsp;Hamid Mohebzadeh ,&nbsp;Changhyun Jun ,&nbsp;Manish Pandey ,&nbsp;Dongkyn Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.advengsoft.2024.103856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) data are vital for monitoring vegetation dynamics and health. However, NDVI time-series data obtained via remote sensing often contain missing values due to factors such as cloud cover, snow, and hardware failures. To address this problem and fill gaps in NDVI data from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), this study combines the multiple imputations by chained equations (MICE) model with three machine learning techniques: Knearest neighbor, multilayer perceptron (MLP), and boosted regression tree. Additionally, the data interpolating convolutional auto-encoder (DINCAE), a recently proposed imputation method, is employed for imputation and comparison. The performance of all these models is evaluated using MODIS NDVI data from Oahu, Hawaii for training and validation. Synthetic scenarios with gap sizes of 20 %, 40 %, 60 %, and 80 % are created to assess the models’ feasibility for each gap size. Furthermore, all models are tested using data from Hawaii Island and Maui. Results indicate that the MICE-MLP model achieves the highest accuracy in imputing missing NDVI values on Oahu, with root mean square error (RMSE) values of 0.1028, 0.1112, and 0.1224 for missing ratios of 20 %, 40 %, and 60 %, respectively. Similarly, MICE-MLP outperforms other models using Hawaii Island and Maui data at gap sizes below 80 %. While the DINCAE model demonstrates superior accuracy at an 80 % gap size, its computational speed is slower than MICE-MLP. Overall, the findings underscore the robustness and accuracy of the MICE-MLP model in imputing missing NDVI data, making it a reliable alternative to existing methods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50866,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Engineering Software","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 103856"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Engineering Software","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965997824002631","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) data are vital for monitoring vegetation dynamics and health. However, NDVI time-series data obtained via remote sensing often contain missing values due to factors such as cloud cover, snow, and hardware failures. To address this problem and fill gaps in NDVI data from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), this study combines the multiple imputations by chained equations (MICE) model with three machine learning techniques: Knearest neighbor, multilayer perceptron (MLP), and boosted regression tree. Additionally, the data interpolating convolutional auto-encoder (DINCAE), a recently proposed imputation method, is employed for imputation and comparison. The performance of all these models is evaluated using MODIS NDVI data from Oahu, Hawaii for training and validation. Synthetic scenarios with gap sizes of 20 %, 40 %, 60 %, and 80 % are created to assess the models’ feasibility for each gap size. Furthermore, all models are tested using data from Hawaii Island and Maui. Results indicate that the MICE-MLP model achieves the highest accuracy in imputing missing NDVI values on Oahu, with root mean square error (RMSE) values of 0.1028, 0.1112, and 0.1224 for missing ratios of 20 %, 40 %, and 60 %, respectively. Similarly, MICE-MLP outperforms other models using Hawaii Island and Maui data at gap sizes below 80 %. While the DINCAE model demonstrates superior accuracy at an 80 % gap size, its computational speed is slower than MICE-MLP. Overall, the findings underscore the robustness and accuracy of the MICE-MLP model in imputing missing NDVI data, making it a reliable alternative to existing methods.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Engineering Software
Advances in Engineering Software 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
169
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The objective of this journal is to communicate recent and projected advances in computer-based engineering techniques. The fields covered include mechanical, aerospace, civil and environmental engineering, with an emphasis on research and development leading to practical problem-solving. The scope of the journal includes: • Innovative computational strategies and numerical algorithms for large-scale engineering problems • Analysis and simulation techniques and systems • Model and mesh generation • Control of the accuracy, stability and efficiency of computational process • Exploitation of new computing environments (eg distributed hetergeneous and collaborative computing) • Advanced visualization techniques, virtual environments and prototyping • Applications of AI, knowledge-based systems, computational intelligence, including fuzzy logic, neural networks and evolutionary computations • Application of object-oriented technology to engineering problems • Intelligent human computer interfaces • Design automation, multidisciplinary design and optimization • CAD, CAE and integrated process and product development systems • Quality and reliability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信