Auditory hallucinations simulation in mental health nursing education: a scoping review

IF 1.9 Q2 NURSING

Teaching and Learning in Nursing Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.teln.2024.10.004

Mauro Parozzi MsN, RN, PhD(s) , Mattia Bozzetti MsN, RN, PhD(s) , Paolo Ferrara PhD, MsN, RN , Stefano Mancin MsN, RN, PhD(s) , Anne Destrebecq MsN, RN , Marco Sguanci PhD, MsN, RN , Andrea Gazzelloni PhD, MsN, RN , Claudia Fantuzzi MsN, RN, PhD(s) , Maura Lusignani , Stefano Terzoni PhD, MsN, RN

{"title":"Auditory hallucinations simulation in mental health nursing education: a scoping review","authors":"Mauro Parozzi MsN, RN, PhD(s) , Mattia Bozzetti MsN, RN, PhD(s) , Paolo Ferrara PhD, MsN, RN , Stefano Mancin MsN, RN, PhD(s) , Anne Destrebecq MsN, RN , Marco Sguanci PhD, MsN, RN , Andrea Gazzelloni PhD, MsN, RN , Claudia Fantuzzi MsN, RN, PhD(s) , Maura Lusignani , Stefano Terzoni PhD, MsN, RN","doi":"10.1016/j.teln.2024.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This scoping review aims to identify the state of the art of simulation in nursing education for patients with mental health problems presenting auditory hallucinations. Specifically, it aims to identify outcomes studied in the literature, existing tools used to simulate auditory hallucinations, the effectiveness of such methodology and tools, and learners' experience and satisfaction.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A Scoping Review was performed by consulting the PubMed, CINAHL, SCOPUS, Web Of Science, PsycINFO (Ovid), including full-text articles published between 2013 and 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Review methods</h3><div>A scoping review was conducted following the Arksey & O'Malley framework and integrating relevant aspects of the Johanna Briggs Institute methodology for Scoping Review. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) was followed for reporting. Quality apprisal was also performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirteen studies were included. Retrived evidence suggests the effectiveness of the methodology and student satisfaction. However, some risks have been outlined that nursing educators must necessarily consider.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Evidence supports the use of this type of simulation, which, however, is not risk free.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46287,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","volume":"20 1","pages":"Pages e175-e181"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308724002117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This scoping review aims to identify the state of the art of simulation in nursing education for patients with mental health problems presenting auditory hallucinations. Specifically, it aims to identify outcomes studied in the literature, existing tools used to simulate auditory hallucinations, the effectiveness of such methodology and tools, and learners' experience and satisfaction.

Design

A Scoping Review was performed by consulting the PubMed, CINAHL, SCOPUS, Web Of Science, PsycINFO (Ovid), including full-text articles published between 2013 and 2023.

Review methods

A scoping review was conducted following the Arksey & O'Malley framework and integrating relevant aspects of the Johanna Briggs Institute methodology for Scoping Review. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) was followed for reporting. Quality apprisal was also performed.

Results

Thirteen studies were included. Retrived evidence suggests the effectiveness of the methodology and student satisfaction. However, some risks have been outlined that nursing educators must necessarily consider.

Conclusion

Evidence supports the use of this type of simulation, which, however, is not risk free.

查看原文本刊更多论文

心理健康护理教育中的幻听模拟：范围审查

目的本范围综述旨在确定针对出现幻听的精神疾病患者的护理教育模拟技术的现状。具体而言，它旨在确定文献中研究的结果、用于模拟幻听的现有工具、此类方法和工具的有效性以及学习者的体验和满意度。设计通过查阅PubMed、CINAHL、SCOPUS、Web Of Science、PsycINFO (Ovid)，包括2013年至2023年间发表的全文文章，进行了范围界定综述。综述方法按照Arksey & O'Malley框架，并结合约翰娜-布里格斯研究所范围界定综述方法的相关方面，进行了范围界定综述。在报告方面，遵循了《系统性综述和荟萃分析的首选报告项目》（Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews，PRISMA-ScR）。结果共纳入了 13 项研究。检索到的证据表明该方法有效，学生满意度高。结论有证据支持使用这种类型的模拟，但并非没有风险。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Teaching and Learning in Nursing NURSING-

CiteScore

2.60

自引率

10.50%

发文量

119

审稿时长

37 days

期刊介绍： Teaching and Learning in Nursing is the Official Journal of the National Organization of Associate Degree Nursing. The journal is dedicated to the advancement of Associate Degree Nursing education and practice, and promotes collaboration in charting the future of health care education and delivery. Topics include: - Managing Different Learning Styles - New Faculty Mentoring - Legal Issues - Research - Legislative Issues - Instructional Design Strategies - Leadership, Management Roles - Unique Funding for Programs and Faculty