Targeting coethnic voters, elites, or both? Evidence from aid allocation in Malawi

IF 5.4 1区 经济学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Dongil Lee
{"title":"Targeting coethnic voters, elites, or both? Evidence from aid allocation in Malawi","authors":"Dongil Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Top leaders in Africa favor their coethnic voters when allocating government resources. However, a growing literature on political elites implies the importance of those actors for mobilizing political support for top leaders—hence, the need for presidents to target elites. Do top leaders target coethnic voters, coethnic elites, or both? To address the question, I use the difference-in-differences estimation drawing upon foreign aid allocation in Malawi during 1999-2010. The results show that controlling for the share of their coethnic voters, constituencies represented by the incumbent president’s coethnic Members of Parliament (MPs) receive 13%–75% more aid disbursement per capita than those represented by non-coethnic MPs. This suggests that leaders target coethnic elites in addition to coethnic voters. I also find that this favoritism is due to coethnic MPs’ electoral mobilization capacity and their personal loyalty to the president. This study highlights the importance of coalition building centered around coethnic elites in multiethnic countries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48463,"journal":{"name":"World Development","volume":"188 ","pages":"Article 106907"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Development","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X24003784","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Top leaders in Africa favor their coethnic voters when allocating government resources. However, a growing literature on political elites implies the importance of those actors for mobilizing political support for top leaders—hence, the need for presidents to target elites. Do top leaders target coethnic voters, coethnic elites, or both? To address the question, I use the difference-in-differences estimation drawing upon foreign aid allocation in Malawi during 1999-2010. The results show that controlling for the share of their coethnic voters, constituencies represented by the incumbent president’s coethnic Members of Parliament (MPs) receive 13%–75% more aid disbursement per capita than those represented by non-coethnic MPs. This suggests that leaders target coethnic elites in addition to coethnic voters. I also find that this favoritism is due to coethnic MPs’ electoral mobilization capacity and their personal loyalty to the president. This study highlights the importance of coalition building centered around coethnic elites in multiethnic countries.
针对同种族选民,精英,还是两者兼而有之?来自马拉维援助分配的证据
非洲的高层领导人在分配政府资源时更倾向于同种族的选民。然而,越来越多的关于政治精英的文献暗示了这些行为者在为最高领导人动员政治支持方面的重要性——因此,总统需要针对精英。高层领导人针对的是同族选民、同族精英,还是两者都有?为了解决这个问题,我使用了1999年至2010年期间马拉维外国援助分配的差中差估计。结果显示,在控制了同种族选民的比例后,现任总统的同种族国会议员所代表的选区比非同种族国会议员所代表的选区获得的人均援助支出多13%-75%。这表明,除了同族选民之外,领导人还瞄准了同族精英。我还发现,这种偏袒是由于同族议员的选举动员能力和他们对总统的个人忠诚。本研究强调了在多民族国家建立以同族精英为中心的联盟的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Development
World Development Multiple-
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
5.80%
发文量
320
期刊介绍: World Development is a multi-disciplinary monthly journal of development studies. It seeks to explore ways of improving standards of living, and the human condition generally, by examining potential solutions to problems such as: poverty, unemployment, malnutrition, disease, lack of shelter, environmental degradation, inadequate scientific and technological resources, trade and payments imbalances, international debt, gender and ethnic discrimination, militarism and civil conflict, and lack of popular participation in economic and political life. Contributions offer constructive ideas and analysis, and highlight the lessons to be learned from the experiences of different nations, societies, and economies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信