Validity and between-days reliability of two different metabolic systems for measuring gas exchange during walking

IF 1.7 4区医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL

Medical Engineering & Physics Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.medengphy.2024.104281

Juan M.A. Alcantara , Fernando Alonso-Gonzalo , Antonio Clavero-Jimeno , Andres Marmol-Perez , Jose Antonio Suarez-Roman , Jonatan R. Ruiz

{"title":"Validity and between-days reliability of two different metabolic systems for measuring gas exchange during walking","authors":"Juan M.A. Alcantara , Fernando Alonso-Gonzalo , Antonio Clavero-Jimeno , Andres Marmol-Perez , Jose Antonio Suarez-Roman , Jonatan R. Ruiz","doi":"10.1016/j.medengphy.2024.104281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Portable metabolic systems for assessing gas exchange outside the laboratory and clinical settings are increasing their popularity. We aimed to determine the validity and the reliability of the K5 portable system (Cosmed, Rome, Italy) and the Omnical (Maastricht Instruments, Maastricht, The Netherlands) metabolic cart.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Gas exchange was measured, using the K5 and the Omnical in a randomised and counterbalanced order, in 35 participants (19 women; age: 26 ± 3 yrs.) using a walking protocol on 2 non-consecutive (48 h apart) days. The protocol consisted of a 5 min walk and 2.5 min rest cycle starting at 3.5 km/h and increasing in 1 km/h to 6.5 km/h. The protocol was repeated twice after a 10–15 min resting. To determine validity and reliability, we conducted two-factor repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), coefficients of variation (CV) and Bland-Altman analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Repeated measures ANOVA showed that mean oxygen consumption, carbon dioxide production and energy expenditure were higher for the K5 compared to the Omnical on both visits (all <em>P</em> < 0.001). Respiratory exchange ratio (RER) was similar among systems at faster (≥4.5 km/h) walking speeds. ICC, CV and Bland-Altman showed a better reliability of the Omnical (ICCs ranged from 0.71 to 0.86, and CVs from 3.1 % to 7.1 %) compared to the K5 (ICCs ranged from 0.40 to 0.98, and CVs from 2.6 % to 6.3 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The K5 portable system provides similar RER values to the Omnical metabolic cart, although the Omnical reliability was better for most outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49836,"journal":{"name":"Medical Engineering & Physics","volume":"136 ","pages":"Article 104281"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Engineering & Physics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350453324001814","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Portable metabolic systems for assessing gas exchange outside the laboratory and clinical settings are increasing their popularity. We aimed to determine the validity and the reliability of the K5 portable system (Cosmed, Rome, Italy) and the Omnical (Maastricht Instruments, Maastricht, The Netherlands) metabolic cart.

Methods

Gas exchange was measured, using the K5 and the Omnical in a randomised and counterbalanced order, in 35 participants (19 women; age: 26 ± 3 yrs.) using a walking protocol on 2 non-consecutive (48 h apart) days. The protocol consisted of a 5 min walk and 2.5 min rest cycle starting at 3.5 km/h and increasing in 1 km/h to 6.5 km/h. The protocol was repeated twice after a 10–15 min resting. To determine validity and reliability, we conducted two-factor repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), coefficients of variation (CV) and Bland-Altman analyses.

Results

Repeated measures ANOVA showed that mean oxygen consumption, carbon dioxide production and energy expenditure were higher for the K5 compared to the Omnical on both visits (all P < 0.001). Respiratory exchange ratio (RER) was similar among systems at faster (≥4.5 km/h) walking speeds. ICC, CV and Bland-Altman showed a better reliability of the Omnical (ICCs ranged from 0.71 to 0.86, and CVs from 3.1 % to 7.1 %) compared to the K5 (ICCs ranged from 0.40 to 0.98, and CVs from 2.6 % to 6.3 %).

Conclusions

The K5 portable system provides similar RER values to the Omnical metabolic cart, although the Omnical reliability was better for most outcomes.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Medical Engineering & Physics 工程技术-工程：生物医学

CiteScore

4.30

自引率

4.50%

发文量

172

审稿时长

3.0 months

期刊介绍： Medical Engineering & Physics provides a forum for the publication of the latest developments in biomedical engineering, and reflects the essential multidisciplinary nature of the subject. The journal publishes in-depth critical reviews, scientific papers and technical notes. Our focus encompasses the application of the basic principles of physics and engineering to the development of medical devices and technology, with the ultimate aim of producing improvements in the quality of health care.Topics covered include biomechanics, biomaterials, mechanobiology, rehabilitation engineering, biomedical signal processing and medical device development. Medical Engineering & Physics aims to keep both engineers and clinicians abreast of the latest applications of technology to health care.