From Technology-Challenged Teachers to Empowered Digitalized Citizens: Exploring the Profiles and Antecedents of Teacher AI Literacy in the Chinese EFL Context
{"title":"From Technology-Challenged Teachers to Empowered Digitalized Citizens: Exploring the Profiles and Antecedents of Teacher AI Literacy in the Chinese EFL Context","authors":"Ziwen Pan, Yongliang Wang","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Artificial Intelligence (AI) literacy has come to the spotlight, empowering individuals to adeptly navigate the modern digitalised world. However, studies on teacher AI literacy in the English as a Foreign Language (EFL) context remain limited. This study aims to identify intraindividual differences in AI literacy and examine its associations with age and years of teaching experience among 782 English teachers. Given the absence of a reliable instrument to measure teacher AI literacy, we first constructed and validated a scale encompassing five sub-scales: <i>AI Knowledge</i>, <i>AI Use</i>, <i>AI Assessment</i>, <i>AI Design</i>, and <i>AI Ethics</i>. Subsequently, latent profile analysis (LPA) was conducted using <i>Mplus</i> 7.4, with the results revealing four distinct profiles: Poor AI literacy (C1: 12.1%), Moderate AI literacy (C2: 45.5%), Good AI literacy (C3: 28.4%), and Excellent AI literacy (C4: 14.1%). Multinomial logistic regression analyses indicated significant associations between teacher AI literacy and both age and years of teaching experience. Additionally, 32 respondents participated in semi-structured interviews. The qualitative data analysed with MAXQDA 2022 triangulated the quantitative results and offered deeper insights into teachers’ perceptions of their AI literacy. This study provides both theoretical and practical implications for understanding teacher AI literacy in the Chinese EFL context.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"60 1","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.70020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) literacy has come to the spotlight, empowering individuals to adeptly navigate the modern digitalised world. However, studies on teacher AI literacy in the English as a Foreign Language (EFL) context remain limited. This study aims to identify intraindividual differences in AI literacy and examine its associations with age and years of teaching experience among 782 English teachers. Given the absence of a reliable instrument to measure teacher AI literacy, we first constructed and validated a scale encompassing five sub-scales: AI Knowledge, AI Use, AI Assessment, AI Design, and AI Ethics. Subsequently, latent profile analysis (LPA) was conducted using Mplus 7.4, with the results revealing four distinct profiles: Poor AI literacy (C1: 12.1%), Moderate AI literacy (C2: 45.5%), Good AI literacy (C3: 28.4%), and Excellent AI literacy (C4: 14.1%). Multinomial logistic regression analyses indicated significant associations between teacher AI literacy and both age and years of teaching experience. Additionally, 32 respondents participated in semi-structured interviews. The qualitative data analysed with MAXQDA 2022 triangulated the quantitative results and offered deeper insights into teachers’ perceptions of their AI literacy. This study provides both theoretical and practical implications for understanding teacher AI literacy in the Chinese EFL context.
期刊介绍:
The prime aims of the European Journal of Education are: - To examine, compare and assess education policies, trends, reforms and programmes of European countries in an international perspective - To disseminate policy debates and research results to a wide audience of academics, researchers, practitioners and students of education sciences - To contribute to the policy debate at the national and European level by providing European administrators and policy-makers in international organisations, national and local governments with comparative and up-to-date material centred on specific themes of common interest.