From Technology-Challenged Teachers to Empowered Digitalized Citizens: Exploring the Profiles and Antecedents of Teacher AI Literacy in the Chinese EFL Context

IF 2.8 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Ziwen Pan, Yongliang Wang
{"title":"From Technology-Challenged Teachers to Empowered Digitalized Citizens: Exploring the Profiles and Antecedents of Teacher AI Literacy in the Chinese EFL Context","authors":"Ziwen Pan,&nbsp;Yongliang Wang","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Artificial Intelligence (AI) literacy has come to the spotlight, empowering individuals to adeptly navigate the modern digitalised world. However, studies on teacher AI literacy in the English as a Foreign Language (EFL) context remain limited. This study aims to identify intraindividual differences in AI literacy and examine its associations with age and years of teaching experience among 782 English teachers. Given the absence of a reliable instrument to measure teacher AI literacy, we first constructed and validated a scale encompassing five sub-scales: <i>AI Knowledge</i>, <i>AI Use</i>, <i>AI Assessment</i>, <i>AI Design</i>, and <i>AI Ethics</i>. Subsequently, latent profile analysis (LPA) was conducted using <i>Mplus</i> 7.4, with the results revealing four distinct profiles: Poor AI literacy (C1: 12.1%), Moderate AI literacy (C2: 45.5%), Good AI literacy (C3: 28.4%), and Excellent AI literacy (C4: 14.1%). Multinomial logistic regression analyses indicated significant associations between teacher AI literacy and both age and years of teaching experience. Additionally, 32 respondents participated in semi-structured interviews. The qualitative data analysed with MAXQDA 2022 triangulated the quantitative results and offered deeper insights into teachers’ perceptions of their AI literacy. This study provides both theoretical and practical implications for understanding teacher AI literacy in the Chinese EFL context.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"60 1","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.70020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) literacy has come to the spotlight, empowering individuals to adeptly navigate the modern digitalised world. However, studies on teacher AI literacy in the English as a Foreign Language (EFL) context remain limited. This study aims to identify intraindividual differences in AI literacy and examine its associations with age and years of teaching experience among 782 English teachers. Given the absence of a reliable instrument to measure teacher AI literacy, we first constructed and validated a scale encompassing five sub-scales: AI Knowledge, AI Use, AI Assessment, AI Design, and AI Ethics. Subsequently, latent profile analysis (LPA) was conducted using Mplus 7.4, with the results revealing four distinct profiles: Poor AI literacy (C1: 12.1%), Moderate AI literacy (C2: 45.5%), Good AI literacy (C3: 28.4%), and Excellent AI literacy (C4: 14.1%). Multinomial logistic regression analyses indicated significant associations between teacher AI literacy and both age and years of teaching experience. Additionally, 32 respondents participated in semi-structured interviews. The qualitative data analysed with MAXQDA 2022 triangulated the quantitative results and offered deeper insights into teachers’ perceptions of their AI literacy. This study provides both theoretical and practical implications for understanding teacher AI literacy in the Chinese EFL context.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Education
European Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: The prime aims of the European Journal of Education are: - To examine, compare and assess education policies, trends, reforms and programmes of European countries in an international perspective - To disseminate policy debates and research results to a wide audience of academics, researchers, practitioners and students of education sciences - To contribute to the policy debate at the national and European level by providing European administrators and policy-makers in international organisations, national and local governments with comparative and up-to-date material centred on specific themes of common interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信