Workshop for the revision of the terrestrial ecotoxicology guidance document for pesticides risk assessment and for the development of an approach on indirect effects

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), European Commission (EC)
{"title":"Workshop for the revision of the terrestrial ecotoxicology guidance document for pesticides risk assessment and for the development of an approach on indirect effects","authors":"European Food Safety Authority (EFSA),&nbsp;European Commission (EC)","doi":"10.2903/sp.efsa.2025.EN-9215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The workshop, co-organized by EFSA and the European Commission (DG SANTE) on 8-9 October 2024 in Brussels, was the first step in response to the mandates requesting EFSA to review the Guidance Document on Terrestrial Ecotoxicology and to develop a framework for assessing potential indirect effects on biodiversity through trophic interactions in agro-environmental conditions. The event featured three discussion rounds: Round 1 focused on identifying gaps in current practices, Round 2 provided deeper analysis of these gaps, and Round 3 examined data availability, feasibility, and potential methodologies for addressing the gaps identified in Rounds 1 and 2. The workshop's breakout sessions, central to the event, allowed participants to engage in in-depth discussions on five specialized topics: Exposure, Non-Target Arthropods, Non-Target Terrestrial Plants, in-soil organisms, and indirect effects. These sessions aimed to gather stakeholder input on the limitations of the current guidance, exchange knowledge on available data and test guidelines, and clarify expectations for the upcoming revision. Each group addressed specific aspects, such as exposure pathways, problem formulation, and effect assessment. The group on indirect effect, a topic currently lacking specific guidance, discussed what can be feasibly achieved in the course of the mandate timeframe. The plenary sessions, held at the end of each day, provided an opportunity for group rapporteurs to present the key findings from their breakout discussions, including identified gaps and suggestions for improvements. These presentations were followed by a Question &amp; Answer session with the audience and reflections from EFSA on the discussions. The outcomes of the breakout sessions were enriching, offering valuable insights that will inform the revision of the guidance document, ensuring it reflects emerging needs and challenges in environmental protection.</p>","PeriodicalId":100395,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Supporting Publications","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/sp.efsa.2025.EN-9215","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFSA Supporting Publications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/sp.efsa.2025.EN-9215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The workshop, co-organized by EFSA and the European Commission (DG SANTE) on 8-9 October 2024 in Brussels, was the first step in response to the mandates requesting EFSA to review the Guidance Document on Terrestrial Ecotoxicology and to develop a framework for assessing potential indirect effects on biodiversity through trophic interactions in agro-environmental conditions. The event featured three discussion rounds: Round 1 focused on identifying gaps in current practices, Round 2 provided deeper analysis of these gaps, and Round 3 examined data availability, feasibility, and potential methodologies for addressing the gaps identified in Rounds 1 and 2. The workshop's breakout sessions, central to the event, allowed participants to engage in in-depth discussions on five specialized topics: Exposure, Non-Target Arthropods, Non-Target Terrestrial Plants, in-soil organisms, and indirect effects. These sessions aimed to gather stakeholder input on the limitations of the current guidance, exchange knowledge on available data and test guidelines, and clarify expectations for the upcoming revision. Each group addressed specific aspects, such as exposure pathways, problem formulation, and effect assessment. The group on indirect effect, a topic currently lacking specific guidance, discussed what can be feasibly achieved in the course of the mandate timeframe. The plenary sessions, held at the end of each day, provided an opportunity for group rapporteurs to present the key findings from their breakout discussions, including identified gaps and suggestions for improvements. These presentations were followed by a Question & Answer session with the audience and reflections from EFSA on the discussions. The outcomes of the breakout sessions were enriching, offering valuable insights that will inform the revision of the guidance document, ensuring it reflects emerging needs and challenges in environmental protection.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信