Plant-Based Meat Alternatives Intake and Its Association With Health Status Among Vegetarians of the UK Biobank Volunteer Population

IF 6.9 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Food frontiers Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1002/fft2.532
Hana F. Navratilova, Anthony D. Whetton, Nophar Geifman
{"title":"Plant-Based Meat Alternatives Intake and Its Association With Health Status Among Vegetarians of the UK Biobank Volunteer Population","authors":"Hana F. Navratilova,&nbsp;Anthony D. Whetton,&nbsp;Nophar Geifman","doi":"10.1002/fft2.532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Consumption of plant-based meat alternatives (PBMAs) within the vegetarian population is increasing. This study assessed the relationship between PBMA intake and health markers using the UK Biobank cohort. Participants were categorized into vegetarian PBMA consumers and vegetarian PBMA nonconsumers. Nonparametric statistical tests were used to evaluate differences in participants’ characteristics, food intake, and 30 blood biochemistry measures after assessing data distributions. Metabolomics (168 metabolites) and proteomics (2923 proteins) data were further examined to identify significant differences between the two participant groups. Relative risks (RRs) for 45 chronic diseases and mental conditions were calculated using Poisson regression. Sensitivity analysis accounted for sociodemographic factors, and the proportion of energy from ultra-processed food (UPF) intake was determined. No substantial differences in sodium, free sugar, total sugar, or saturated fatty acids intake between vegetarian PBMA consumers and nonconsumers were found. However, PBMA consumers exhibited higher blood pressure (130/79 and 129/78 mmHg for consumer and nonconsumer groups, respectively) and elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (1.76 ± 3.12 and 1.57 ± 3.17 mg/L for consumer and nonconsumer groups, respectively). Metabolite and protein abundance analysis showed no notable differences. Pathway enrichment analysis suggested that PBMAs may influence immune reactions through cell signaling pathways. PBMA consumers had a 42% increased risk of depression (<i>p</i> = 0.03) and a 40% reduction in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) risk (<i>p</i> = 0.02), compared to nonconsumers. In conclusion, while no clear health risks or benefits were associated with PBMA consumption in vegetarians, the higher risk of depression, elevated CRP, and lower apolipoprotein A levels in PBMA consumers suggest potential inflammatory concerns that warrant further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":73042,"journal":{"name":"Food frontiers","volume":"6 1","pages":"590-598"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fft2.532","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food frontiers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://iadns.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fft2.532","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Consumption of plant-based meat alternatives (PBMAs) within the vegetarian population is increasing. This study assessed the relationship between PBMA intake and health markers using the UK Biobank cohort. Participants were categorized into vegetarian PBMA consumers and vegetarian PBMA nonconsumers. Nonparametric statistical tests were used to evaluate differences in participants’ characteristics, food intake, and 30 blood biochemistry measures after assessing data distributions. Metabolomics (168 metabolites) and proteomics (2923 proteins) data were further examined to identify significant differences between the two participant groups. Relative risks (RRs) for 45 chronic diseases and mental conditions were calculated using Poisson regression. Sensitivity analysis accounted for sociodemographic factors, and the proportion of energy from ultra-processed food (UPF) intake was determined. No substantial differences in sodium, free sugar, total sugar, or saturated fatty acids intake between vegetarian PBMA consumers and nonconsumers were found. However, PBMA consumers exhibited higher blood pressure (130/79 and 129/78 mmHg for consumer and nonconsumer groups, respectively) and elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (1.76 ± 3.12 and 1.57 ± 3.17 mg/L for consumer and nonconsumer groups, respectively). Metabolite and protein abundance analysis showed no notable differences. Pathway enrichment analysis suggested that PBMAs may influence immune reactions through cell signaling pathways. PBMA consumers had a 42% increased risk of depression (p = 0.03) and a 40% reduction in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) risk (p = 0.02), compared to nonconsumers. In conclusion, while no clear health risks or benefits were associated with PBMA consumption in vegetarians, the higher risk of depression, elevated CRP, and lower apolipoprotein A levels in PBMA consumers suggest potential inflammatory concerns that warrant further investigation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

英国生物银行志愿者中素食者的植物性肉类替代品摄入量及其与健康状况的关系
素食者对植物性肉类替代品(pbma)的消费正在增加。本研究使用英国生物银行队列评估PBMA摄入量与健康指标之间的关系。参与者被分为素食PBMA消费者和素食PBMA非消费者。在评估数据分布后,使用非参数统计检验来评估参与者特征、食物摄入和30项血液生化指标的差异。进一步检查代谢组学(168种代谢物)和蛋白质组学(2923种蛋白质)数据,以确定两组参与者之间的显著差异。用泊松回归计算45种慢性疾病和精神疾病的相对危险度(rr)。敏感性分析考虑了社会人口因素,并确定了超加工食品(UPF)摄入能量的比例。在素食PBMA消费者和非素食PBMA消费者之间,钠、游离糖、总糖或饱和脂肪酸的摄入量没有实质性差异。然而,PBMA消费者表现出更高的血压(消费者和非消费者组分别为130/79和129/78 mmHg)和升高的c反应蛋白(CRP)水平(消费者和非消费者组分别为1.76±3.12和1.57±3.17 mg/L)。代谢物和蛋白质丰度分析无显著差异。途径富集分析表明,pbma可能通过细胞信号通路影响免疫反应。与不服用PBMA的人相比,服用PBMA的人患抑郁症的风险增加42% (p = 0.03),患肠易激综合征(IBS)的风险降低40% (p = 0.02)。总之,虽然素食者摄入PBMA没有明确的健康风险或益处,但PBMA消费者患抑郁症的风险较高,CRP升高,载脂蛋白A水平较低,这表明潜在的炎症问题值得进一步调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信