Examining Teachers' Classroom Practices in the Context of Computational Thinking Skills: A Q Method Study

IF 2.8 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Sümeyra Meryem Kılıç, İbrahim Yıldırım
{"title":"Examining Teachers' Classroom Practices in the Context of Computational Thinking Skills: A Q Method Study","authors":"Sümeyra Meryem Kılıç,&nbsp;İbrahim Yıldırım","doi":"10.1111/ejed.12873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study aimed to examine teachers' classroom practices in the context of computational thinking skills and to determine their views on computational thinking. In the research process, the Q method was used in which quantitative and qualitative methods were used together. The participants of the research consist of 48 primary school teachers. The socioeconomic level of the environment of the schools where they work, professional seniority and gender variables of the teachers in the participants were collected. It was determined that teachers approached computational thinking skills positively, but they did not fully use the subdimensions of computational thinking skills in their classroom practices. It was determined that abstraction, which is seen as the most important dimension of computational thinking skills in the literature, was not consciously used by teachers in their classroom practices.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.12873","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to examine teachers' classroom practices in the context of computational thinking skills and to determine their views on computational thinking. In the research process, the Q method was used in which quantitative and qualitative methods were used together. The participants of the research consist of 48 primary school teachers. The socioeconomic level of the environment of the schools where they work, professional seniority and gender variables of the teachers in the participants were collected. It was determined that teachers approached computational thinking skills positively, but they did not fully use the subdimensions of computational thinking skills in their classroom practices. It was determined that abstraction, which is seen as the most important dimension of computational thinking skills in the literature, was not consciously used by teachers in their classroom practices.

本研究旨在考察教师在计算思维技能方面的课堂实践,并确定他们对计算思维的看法。在研究过程中,采用了定量和定性相结合的 Q 方法。研究参与者包括 48 名小学教师。收集了参与研究的教师所在学校的社会经济水平、专业资历和性别变量。研究结果表明,教师对计算思维能力的态度是积极的,但他们在课堂实践中并没有充分运用计算思维能力的各个子维度。研究发现,在文献中被视为计算思维能力最重要维度的抽象性并没有被教师在课堂实践中有意识地使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Education
European Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: The prime aims of the European Journal of Education are: - To examine, compare and assess education policies, trends, reforms and programmes of European countries in an international perspective - To disseminate policy debates and research results to a wide audience of academics, researchers, practitioners and students of education sciences - To contribute to the policy debate at the national and European level by providing European administrators and policy-makers in international organisations, national and local governments with comparative and up-to-date material centred on specific themes of common interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信