Real meat shows good performance in maintaining colonic barrier function at a recommended amount of intake in mice

IF 7.4 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Food frontiers Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1002/fft2.497
Yunting Xie, Linlin Cai, Isaiah Henry Ibeogu, Guanghong Zhou, Chunbao Li
{"title":"Real meat shows good performance in maintaining colonic barrier function at a recommended amount of intake in mice","authors":"Yunting Xie,&nbsp;Linlin Cai,&nbsp;Isaiah Henry Ibeogu,&nbsp;Guanghong Zhou,&nbsp;Chunbao Li","doi":"10.1002/fft2.497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study aimed to investigate the effects and underlying mechanisms of real meat and plant-based meat analogs on intestinal barrier function. Methods including PacBio sequencing, HPLC, histological observation, western blotting, and RT-qPCR were jointly applied. The results indicated that the 20-day intake of real meat and plant-based meat analogs did not induce pathological changes in the colon of mice. However, when the feeding period was extended to 68 days, inflammatory infiltration was observed in the colon tissue of mice fed plant-based meat analogs. In contrast, the intake of real meat for 68 days performed better in maintaining colonic barrier function by reducing cell apoptosis, increasing the number of goblet cells and mucin secretion, and upregulating the expression of tight junction proteins. High-throughput sequencing revealed that the intake of real meat significantly altered the composition of the gut microbiota, reducing pro-inflammatory bacteria (such as <i>Bacteroides</i>, <i>Desulfovibrio</i>, or <i>Colidextribacter</i>) or pathogenic bacteria (such as <i>Mucispirillum</i> and <i>Helicobacter</i>) while increasing beneficial bacteria (such as <i>Lactobacillus</i>, <i>Bifidobacterium</i>, or <i>Roseburia</i>). Additionally, the consumption of real meat markedly decreased protein fermentation in the colon, leading to lower levels of cadaverine, putrescine, and spermine. These changes associated with real meat consumption reduced the activation of the pro-inflammatory pathway (lipopolysaccharide/Toll-like receptor 4/nuclear factor kappa B), ultimately maintaining colonic homeostasis in mice. Collectively, the findings suggest that the proper intake of real meat is more beneficial for colon health in mice compared to plant-based meat analogs.</p>","PeriodicalId":73042,"journal":{"name":"Food frontiers","volume":"6 1","pages":"300-315"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fft2.497","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food frontiers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fft2.497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the effects and underlying mechanisms of real meat and plant-based meat analogs on intestinal barrier function. Methods including PacBio sequencing, HPLC, histological observation, western blotting, and RT-qPCR were jointly applied. The results indicated that the 20-day intake of real meat and plant-based meat analogs did not induce pathological changes in the colon of mice. However, when the feeding period was extended to 68 days, inflammatory infiltration was observed in the colon tissue of mice fed plant-based meat analogs. In contrast, the intake of real meat for 68 days performed better in maintaining colonic barrier function by reducing cell apoptosis, increasing the number of goblet cells and mucin secretion, and upregulating the expression of tight junction proteins. High-throughput sequencing revealed that the intake of real meat significantly altered the composition of the gut microbiota, reducing pro-inflammatory bacteria (such as Bacteroides, Desulfovibrio, or Colidextribacter) or pathogenic bacteria (such as Mucispirillum and Helicobacter) while increasing beneficial bacteria (such as Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, or Roseburia). Additionally, the consumption of real meat markedly decreased protein fermentation in the colon, leading to lower levels of cadaverine, putrescine, and spermine. These changes associated with real meat consumption reduced the activation of the pro-inflammatory pathway (lipopolysaccharide/Toll-like receptor 4/nuclear factor kappa B), ultimately maintaining colonic homeostasis in mice. Collectively, the findings suggest that the proper intake of real meat is more beneficial for colon health in mice compared to plant-based meat analogs.

Abstract Image

在小鼠的推荐摄入量下,真肉在维持结肠屏障功能方面表现良好
本研究旨在探讨真肉和植物性肉类类似物对肠道屏障功能的影响及其机制。方法包括PacBio测序、HPLC、组织学观察、western blotting和RT-qPCR联合应用。结果表明,摄入20天的真肉和植物性肉类似物没有引起小鼠结肠的病理变化。然而,当喂养期延长至68天时,在饲喂植物性肉类似物的小鼠结肠组织中观察到炎症浸润。相比之下,摄入68 d的真肉能更好地维持结肠屏障功能,减少细胞凋亡,增加杯状细胞数量和粘蛋白分泌,上调紧密连接蛋白的表达。高通量测序显示,摄入真肉显著改变了肠道微生物群的组成,减少了促炎细菌(如拟杆菌、Desulfovibrio或Colidextribacter)或致病菌(如Mucispirillum和Helicobacter),同时增加了有益细菌(如乳酸杆菌、双歧杆菌或Roseburia)。此外,食用真肉显著减少了结肠中的蛋白质发酵,导致尸胺、腐胺和精胺水平降低。这些变化与真正的肉类消费有关,减少了促炎途径(脂多糖/ toll样受体4/核因子κ B)的激活,最终维持了小鼠的结肠稳态。总的来说,研究结果表明,与植物性肉类类似物相比,适当摄入真肉对小鼠的结肠健康更有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信