Organizations offering line manager training in mental health and presenteeism: A secondary data analysis of organizational-level data

IF 4.9 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Teixiera Dulal-Arthur, Juliet Hassard, Jane Bourke, Maria Wishart, Craig Bartle, Stephen Roper, Vicki Belt, Stavroula Leka, Nick Pahl, Louise Thomson, Holly Blake
{"title":"Organizations offering line manager training in mental health and presenteeism: A secondary data analysis of organizational-level data","authors":"Teixiera Dulal-Arthur,&nbsp;Juliet Hassard,&nbsp;Jane Bourke,&nbsp;Maria Wishart,&nbsp;Craig Bartle,&nbsp;Stephen Roper,&nbsp;Vicki Belt,&nbsp;Stavroula Leka,&nbsp;Nick Pahl,&nbsp;Louise Thomson,&nbsp;Holly Blake","doi":"10.1111/joop.12552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Presenteeism (<i>working while ill</i>) due to mental ill-health is estimated to be one of the largest economic costs to employers. We seek to investigate the relationship between line manager training in mental health (MH) and presenteeism trends at work. The aim of this study was twofold: (i) to examine the relationship between the provision of a new and emerging workplace MH and wellbeing (MH&amp;WB) initiative – <i>line manager (LM) training in MH</i> – and presenteeism as reported by organizations and (ii) to examine the reasons for presenteeism, and organizational-level strategies used to action it. To address these questions, we conducted a secondary data analysis using panel data from 7139 firms in England over four time points (2020–2023). Probit regression analysis revealed that organizations offering LM training are less likely to report presenteeism. Our analysis revealed that providing LM training may increase awareness and readiness to tackle presenteeism within the organization, but this does not always translate into actionable strategies. Limitations of the study and recommendations for future research are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","volume":"98 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joop.12552","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joop.12552","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Presenteeism (working while ill) due to mental ill-health is estimated to be one of the largest economic costs to employers. We seek to investigate the relationship between line manager training in mental health (MH) and presenteeism trends at work. The aim of this study was twofold: (i) to examine the relationship between the provision of a new and emerging workplace MH and wellbeing (MH&WB) initiative – line manager (LM) training in MH – and presenteeism as reported by organizations and (ii) to examine the reasons for presenteeism, and organizational-level strategies used to action it. To address these questions, we conducted a secondary data analysis using panel data from 7139 firms in England over four time points (2020–2023). Probit regression analysis revealed that organizations offering LM training are less likely to report presenteeism. Our analysis revealed that providing LM training may increase awareness and readiness to tackle presenteeism within the organization, but this does not always translate into actionable strategies. Limitations of the study and recommendations for future research are discussed.

提供直线经理心理健康和出勤培训的组织:组织层面数据的二级数据分析
由于精神疾病导致的出勤(带病工作)估计是雇主最大的经济成本之一。我们试图调查直线经理在心理健康方面的培训与工作中的出勤倾向之间的关系。本研究的目的是双重的:(i)检查提供新的和新兴的工作场所MH和福利(MH&;WB)倡议-直线经理(LM) MH培训-与组织报告的出勤之间的关系;(ii)检查出勤的原因,以及用于行动的组织层面策略。为了解决这些问题,我们使用英格兰7139家公司在四个时间点(2020-2023)的面板数据进行了二次数据分析。概率回归分析显示,提供LM培训的组织不太可能报告出勤。我们的分析表明,提供LM培训可能会提高组织内部解决出勤问题的意识和准备,但这并不总是转化为可操作的策略。讨论了本研究的局限性和对未来研究的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology aims to increase understanding of people and organisations at work including: - industrial, organizational, work, vocational and personnel psychology - behavioural and cognitive aspects of industrial relations - ergonomics and human factors Innovative or interdisciplinary approaches with a psychological emphasis are particularly welcome. So are papers which develop the links between occupational/organisational psychology and other areas of the discipline, such as social and cognitive psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信