Peter Gnip, Róbert Kanász, Martin Zoričak, Peter Drotár
{"title":"An experimental survey of imbalanced learning algorithms for bankruptcy prediction","authors":"Peter Gnip, Róbert Kanász, Martin Zoričak, Peter Drotár","doi":"10.1007/s10462-025-11107-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Information about imminent bankruptcy is crucial for financial institutions, decision-making managers, and state agencies. Since bankruptcy prediction is a prevalent research topic, many new methods have been continuously proposed. Bankruptcy prediction is frequently approached as a binary classification task. Since bankruptcy datasets are inherently imbalanced, bankruptcy classification is usually performed using class imbalance learning methods. The nature of these methods is very diverse, but they can usually be categorized as ensemble, cost-sensitive, sampling, and hybrid methods. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive experimental comparison of 45 methods. These methods were selected because they cover the approaches and algorithms frequently employed for bankruptcy prediction and imbalanced learning. Extensive experiments on 15 publicly available datasets with different imbalance ratios showed that the methods based on a combination of ensemble learning and undersampling are able to handle data imbalance and achieve the best results for bankruptcy classification.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8449,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence Review","volume":"58 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10462-025-11107-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence Review","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-025-11107-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Information about imminent bankruptcy is crucial for financial institutions, decision-making managers, and state agencies. Since bankruptcy prediction is a prevalent research topic, many new methods have been continuously proposed. Bankruptcy prediction is frequently approached as a binary classification task. Since bankruptcy datasets are inherently imbalanced, bankruptcy classification is usually performed using class imbalance learning methods. The nature of these methods is very diverse, but they can usually be categorized as ensemble, cost-sensitive, sampling, and hybrid methods. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive experimental comparison of 45 methods. These methods were selected because they cover the approaches and algorithms frequently employed for bankruptcy prediction and imbalanced learning. Extensive experiments on 15 publicly available datasets with different imbalance ratios showed that the methods based on a combination of ensemble learning and undersampling are able to handle data imbalance and achieve the best results for bankruptcy classification.
期刊介绍:
Artificial Intelligence Review, a fully open access journal, publishes cutting-edge research in artificial intelligence and cognitive science. It features critical evaluations of applications, techniques, and algorithms, providing a platform for both researchers and application developers. The journal includes refereed survey and tutorial articles, along with reviews and commentary on significant developments in the field.