Responsible Use of Large Language Models: An Analogy with the Oxford Tutorial System

IF 1.8 2区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Michael Lissack , Brenden Meagher
{"title":"Responsible Use of Large Language Models: An Analogy with the Oxford Tutorial System","authors":"Michael Lissack ,&nbsp;Brenden Meagher","doi":"10.1016/j.sheji.2024.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the rapidly evolving landscape of artificial intelligence, large language models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools with the potential to revolutionize how we process information, generate content, and solve complex problems. However, integrating these sophisticated AI systems into academic and professional practices raises critical questions about responsible use, ethical considerations, and the preservation of human expertise. This article introduces a novel framework for understanding and implementing responsible AI use by drawing an analogy between the optimal use of LLMs and the role of the second student in an Oxford Tutorial. Through an in-depth exploration of the Oxford Tutorial system and its parallels with LLM interaction, we propose a nuanced approach to leveraging AI language models while maintaining human agency, fostering critical thinking, and upholding ethical standards. The article examines the implications of this analogy, discusses potential risks of misuse, and provides detailed practical scenarios across various fields. By grounding the use of cutting-edge AI technology in a well-established and respected educational model, this research contributes to the ongoing discourse on AI ethics. It offers valuable insights for academics, professionals, and policymakers grappling with the challenges and opportunities presented by LLMs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37146,"journal":{"name":"She Ji-The Journal of Design Economics and Innovation","volume":"10 4","pages":"Pages 389-413"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"She Ji-The Journal of Design Economics and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405872624000959","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the rapidly evolving landscape of artificial intelligence, large language models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools with the potential to revolutionize how we process information, generate content, and solve complex problems. However, integrating these sophisticated AI systems into academic and professional practices raises critical questions about responsible use, ethical considerations, and the preservation of human expertise. This article introduces a novel framework for understanding and implementing responsible AI use by drawing an analogy between the optimal use of LLMs and the role of the second student in an Oxford Tutorial. Through an in-depth exploration of the Oxford Tutorial system and its parallels with LLM interaction, we propose a nuanced approach to leveraging AI language models while maintaining human agency, fostering critical thinking, and upholding ethical standards. The article examines the implications of this analogy, discusses potential risks of misuse, and provides detailed practical scenarios across various fields. By grounding the use of cutting-edge AI technology in a well-established and respected educational model, this research contributes to the ongoing discourse on AI ethics. It offers valuable insights for academics, professionals, and policymakers grappling with the challenges and opportunities presented by LLMs.
负责任地使用大型语言模型:与牛津导师制的类比
在快速发展的人工智能领域,大型语言模型(llm)已经成为强大的工具,有可能彻底改变我们处理信息、生成内容和解决复杂问题的方式。然而,将这些复杂的人工智能系统整合到学术和专业实践中,会引发有关负责任使用、道德考虑和人类专业知识保护的关键问题。本文通过将法学硕士的最佳使用与牛津大学教程中第二名学生的角色进行类比,介绍了一个理解和实施负责任的人工智能使用的新框架。通过深入探索牛津导师制及其与法学硕士互动的相似之处,我们提出了一种微妙的方法,在保持人类能动性、培养批判性思维和维护道德标准的同时,利用人工智能语言模型。本文研究了这种类比的含义,讨论了滥用的潜在风险,并提供了跨各个领域的详细实际场景。通过将尖端人工智能技术的使用建立在一个成熟且受人尊重的教育模式中,本研究有助于正在进行的人工智能伦理讨论。它为学者、专业人士和政策制定者提供了宝贵的见解,帮助他们应对法学硕士所带来的挑战和机遇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信