Consumer preferences for sugar-sweetened beverages: Evidence from online surveys and laboratory eye-tracking choice experiments

IF 6.8 1区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Yanjun Ren , Qi Liu , Guanzhang Wu , Jens-Peter Loy
{"title":"Consumer preferences for sugar-sweetened beverages: Evidence from online surveys and laboratory eye-tracking choice experiments","authors":"Yanjun Ren ,&nbsp;Qi Liu ,&nbsp;Guanzhang Wu ,&nbsp;Jens-Peter Loy","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2024.102791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The prevalence of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) consumption is supposed to be one of the most important drivers of nutritional diseases, while little is known about whether sugar labeling could affect consumers’ preferences for low- or sugar-free beverages and what the role of nutritional cognition is in their consumption choice. Based on the data from the online survey and laboratory experiments, this study conducts a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to evaluate consumers’ willingness to pay (WTPs) for SSBs and examine to what extent nutritional cognition could affect their preferences. More importantly, we extend our analysis by incorporating consumers’ visual attention data based on eye-tracking technology into DCE to highlight the underlying physiological mechanisms of consumers’ choices. The results show that consumers exhibit various preferences and WTPs for different attributes of SSBs, including sugar content, functional category, and health claims. Consumers have higher preferences and WTPs for low-sugar and sugar-free beverages compared to SSBs, especially those with higher nutritional cognition who are more likely to choose sugar-free beverages. Evidence from eye-tracking technology suggests that consumers paying higher visual attention to the specific attribute considered are more likely to choose the products with that attribute, and individuals who exhibit higher nutritional cognition are more attentive to low-sugar and sugar-free attributes. This study suggests that consumers’ nutritional cognition and more prominent product design of sugar labeling should be considered in the promotion of low-sugar and sugar-free products.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":"130 ","pages":"Article 102791"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Policy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919224002021","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The prevalence of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) consumption is supposed to be one of the most important drivers of nutritional diseases, while little is known about whether sugar labeling could affect consumers’ preferences for low- or sugar-free beverages and what the role of nutritional cognition is in their consumption choice. Based on the data from the online survey and laboratory experiments, this study conducts a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to evaluate consumers’ willingness to pay (WTPs) for SSBs and examine to what extent nutritional cognition could affect their preferences. More importantly, we extend our analysis by incorporating consumers’ visual attention data based on eye-tracking technology into DCE to highlight the underlying physiological mechanisms of consumers’ choices. The results show that consumers exhibit various preferences and WTPs for different attributes of SSBs, including sugar content, functional category, and health claims. Consumers have higher preferences and WTPs for low-sugar and sugar-free beverages compared to SSBs, especially those with higher nutritional cognition who are more likely to choose sugar-free beverages. Evidence from eye-tracking technology suggests that consumers paying higher visual attention to the specific attribute considered are more likely to choose the products with that attribute, and individuals who exhibit higher nutritional cognition are more attentive to low-sugar and sugar-free attributes. This study suggests that consumers’ nutritional cognition and more prominent product design of sugar labeling should be considered in the promotion of low-sugar and sugar-free products.
消费者对含糖饮料的偏好:来自在线调查和实验室眼球追踪选择实验的证据
含糖饮料的普遍消费被认为是营养性疾病最重要的驱动因素之一,而糖标签是否会影响消费者对低糖或无糖饮料的偏好,以及营养认知在消费者消费选择中的作用,人们知之甚少。基于在线调查和实验室实验的数据,本研究采用离散选择实验(DCE)来评估消费者对SSBs的支付意愿(WTPs),并考察营养认知对其偏好的影响程度。更重要的是,我们通过将基于眼动追踪技术的消费者视觉注意力数据纳入DCE来扩展我们的分析,以突出消费者选择的潜在生理机制。结果表明,消费者对SSBs的不同属性(包括糖含量、功能类别和健康声明)表现出不同的偏好和wtp。消费者对低糖和无糖饮料的偏好和WTPs高于ssb,特别是营养认知水平较高的消费者更倾向于选择无糖饮料。眼动追踪技术的证据表明,对所考虑的特定属性给予更高视觉关注的消费者更有可能选择具有该属性的产品,而具有更高营养认知的个体更关注低糖和无糖属性。本研究建议在低糖和无糖产品的推广中应考虑消费者的营养认知和更突出的糖标签产品设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Policy
Food Policy 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.60%
发文量
128
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Food Policy is a multidisciplinary journal publishing original research and novel evidence on issues in the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of policies for the food sector in developing, transition, and advanced economies. Our main focus is on the economic and social aspect of food policy, and we prioritize empirical studies informing international food policy debates. Provided that articles make a clear and explicit contribution to food policy debates of international interest, we consider papers from any of the social sciences. Papers from other disciplines (e.g., law) will be considered only if they provide a key policy contribution, and are written in a style which is accessible to a social science readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信